Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Mar;15(3):323-32. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70012-9. Epub 2014 Feb 7.
BACKGROUND: In the BRIM-3 trial, vemurafenib was associated with risk reduction versus dacarbazine of both death and progression in patients with advanced BRAF(V600) mutation-positive melanoma. We present an extended follow-up analysis of the total population and in the BRAF(V600E) and BRAF(V600K) mutation subgroups. METHODS: Patients older than 18 years, with treatment-naive metastatic melanoma and whose tumour tissue was positive for BRAF(V600) mutations were eligible. Patients also had to have a life expectancy of at least 3 months, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, and adequate haematological, hepatic, and renal function. Patients were randomly assigned by interactive voice recognition system to receive either vemurafenib (960 mg orally twice daily) or dacarbazine (1000 mg/m(2) of body surface area intravenously every 3 weeks). Coprimary endpoints were overall survival and progression-free survival, analysed in the intention-to-treat population (n=675), with data censored at crossover. A sensitivity analysis was done. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01006980. FINDINGS: 675 eligible patients were enrolled from 104 centres in 12 countries between Jan 4, 2010, and Dec 16, 2010. 337 patients were randomly assigned to receive vemurafenib and 338 to receive dacarbazine. Median follow-up was 12·5 months (IQR 7·7-16·0) on vemurafenib and 9·5 months (3·1-14·7) on dacarbazine. 83 (25%) of the 338 patients initially randomly assigned to dacarbazine crossed over from dacarbazine to vemurafenib. Median overall survival was significantly longer in the vemurafenib group than in the dacarbazine group (13·6 months [95% CI 12·0-15·2] vs 9·7 months [7·9-12·8]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·70 [95% CI 0·57-0·87]; p=0·0008), as was median progression-free survival (6·9 months [95% CI 6·1-7·0] vs 1·6 months [1·6-2·1]; HR 0·38 [95% CI 0·32-0·46]; p<0·0001). For the 598 (91%) patients with BRAF(V600E) disease, median overall survival in the vemurafenib group was 13·3 months (95% CI 11·9-14·9) compared with 10·0 months (8·0-14·0) in the dacarbazine group (HR 0·75 [95% CI 0·60-0·93]; p=0·0085); median progression-free survival was 6·9 months (95% CI 6·2-7·0) and 1·6 months (1·6-2·1), respectively (HR 0·39 [95% CI 0·33-0·47]; p<0·0001). For the 57 (9%) patients with BRAF(V600K) disease, median overall survival in the vemurafenib group was 14·5 months (95% CI 11·2-not estimable) compared with 7·6 months (6·1-16·6) in the dacarbazine group (HR 0·43 [95% CI 0·21-0·90]; p=0·024); median progression-free survival was 5·9 months (95% CI 4·4-9·0) and 1·7 months (1·4-2·9), respectively (HR 0·30 [95% CI 0·16-0·56]; p<0·0001). The most frequent grade 3-4 events were cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma (65 [19%] of 337 patients) and keratoacanthomas (34 [10%]), rash (30 [9%]), and abnormal liver function tests (38 [11%]) in the vemurafenib group and neutropenia (26 [9%] of 287 patients) in the dacarbazine group. Eight (2%) patients in the vemurafenib group and seven (2%) in the dacarbazine group had grade 5 events. INTERPRETATION: Inhibition of BRAF with vemurafenib improves survival in patients with the most common BRAF(V600E) mutation and in patients with the less common BRAF(V600K) mutation. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche-Genentech.
背景:在 BRIM-3 试验中,与接受达卡巴嗪治疗的患者相比,vemurafenib 降低了晚期 BRAF(V600) 突变阳性黑色素瘤患者的死亡和进展风险。我们对总人群以及 BRAF(V600E) 和 BRAF(V600K) 突变亚组进行了扩展随访分析。
方法:年龄大于 18 岁、未经治疗的转移性黑色素瘤且肿瘤组织检测到 BRAF(V600) 突变的患者有资格入组。患者还必须有至少 3 个月的预期寿命、ECOG 体能状态 0 或 1 以及足够的血液学、肝和肾功能。患者通过交互式语音识别系统随机分配接受 vemurafenib(960 mg 口服,每日两次)或达卡巴嗪(1000 mg/m2 体表面积,每 3 周静脉注射一次)治疗。总生存期和无进展生存期是主要终点,在意向治疗人群(n=675)中进行分析,数据在交叉时进行删失。进行了敏感性分析。这项试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT01006980。
结果:2010 年 1 月 4 日至 2010 年 12 月 16 日,在 12 个国家的 104 个中心纳入了 675 名符合条件的患者。337 名患者被随机分配接受 vemurafenib 治疗,338 名患者接受达卡巴嗪治疗。中位随访时间为 vemurafenib 组 12.5 个月(IQR 7.7-16.0),达卡巴嗪组 9.5 个月(3.1-14.7)。最初随机分配接受达卡巴嗪治疗的 338 名患者中有 83 名(25%)交叉至 vemurafenib 组。vemurafenib 组的中位总生存期明显长于达卡巴嗪组(13.6 个月[95%CI 12.0-15.2] vs 9.7 个月[7.9-12.8];风险比[HR]0.70[95%CI 0.57-0.87];p=0.0008),中位无进展生存期也明显长于达卡巴嗪组(6.9 个月[95%CI 6.1-7.0] vs 1.6 个月[1.6-2.1];HR 0.38[95%CI 0.32-0.46];p<0.0001)。对于 598 名(91%)具有 BRAF(V600E) 疾病的患者,vemurafenib 组的中位总生存期为 13.3 个月(95%CI 11.9-14.9),而达卡巴嗪组为 10.0 个月(8.0-14.0)(HR 0.75[95%CI 0.60-0.93];p=0.0085);中位无进展生存期分别为 6.9 个月(95%CI 6.2-7.0)和 1.6 个月(1.6-2.1)(HR 0.39[95%CI 0.33-0.47];p<0.0001)。对于 57 名(9%)具有 BRAF(V600K) 疾病的患者,vemurafenib 组的中位总生存期为 14.5 个月(95%CI 11.2-不可估计),而达卡巴嗪组为 7.6 个月(6.1-16.6)(HR 0.43[95%CI 0.21-0.90];p=0.024);中位无进展生存期分别为 5.9 个月(95%CI 4.4-9.0)和 1.7 个月(1.4-2.9)(HR 0.30[95%CI 0.16-0.56];p<0.0001)。最常见的 3-4 级事件是皮肤鳞状细胞癌(65 例[19%],337 例)和角化棘皮瘤(34 例[10%])、皮疹(30 例[9%])和肝功能异常(38 例[11%]),vemurafenib 组中发生率为 11%)和中性粒细胞减少症(26 例[9%],287 例)。vemurafenib 组有 8 例(2%)患者和达卡巴嗪组有 7 例(2%)患者发生 5 级事件。
解释:BRAF 抑制用 vemurafenib 改善了最常见的 BRAF(V600E) 突变和不太常见的 BRAF(V600K) 突变患者的生存。
资金来源:罗氏/基因泰克。
N Engl J Med. 2011-6-5
Clin Ther. 2012-6-27
N Engl J Med. 2014-11-16
Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2025-7
Int J Mol Sci. 2025-4-8
Arch Dermatol Res. 2025-1-28
N Engl J Med. 2012-9-29
CA Cancer J Clin. 2012-6-14
N Engl J Med. 2012-2-23