European Forest Institute, Yliopistokatu 6, FI-80100 Joensuu, Finland.
European Forest Institute, Yliopistokatu 6, FI-80100 Joensuu, Finland.
J Environ Manage. 2014 Mar 15;135:45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.01.009. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
In this study participatory approaches were used to develop alternative forest resource management scenarios with particular respect to the effects on increased use of forest bioenergy and its effect on biodiversity in Eastern Finland. As technical planning tools, we utilized a forest management planning system (MELA) and the Tool for Sustainability Impact Assessment (ToSIA) to visualize the impacts of the scenarios. We organized a stakeholder workshop where group discussions were used as a participatory method to get the stakeholder preferences and insights concerning forest resource use in the year 2030. Feedback from the workshop was then complemented with a questionnaire. Based on the results of the workshop and a questionnaire we developed three alternative forest resource scenarios: (1) bioenergy 2030 - in which energy production is more centralized and efficient; (2) biodiversity 2030 - in which harvesting methods are more nature friendly and protected forests make up 10% of the total forest area; and (3) mixed bioenergy + biodiversity 2030 scenario - in which wood production, recreation and nature protection are assigned to the most suitable areas. The study showed that stakeholder engagement combined with the MELA and ToSIA tools can be a useful approach in scenario development.
本研究采用参与式方法制定了替代森林资源管理方案,特别关注增加森林生物能源利用及其对芬兰东部生物多样性的影响。作为技术规划工具,我们利用森林管理规划系统(MELA)和可持续性影响评估工具(ToSIA)来可视化方案的影响。我们组织了一次利益相关者研讨会,在研讨会上使用小组讨论作为参与式方法,以了解利益相关者对 2030 年森林资源利用的偏好和见解。研讨会的反馈意见随后通过问卷调查进行了补充。根据研讨会和问卷调查的结果,我们制定了三个替代森林资源方案:(1)生物能源 2030 - 能源生产更加集中和高效;(2)生物多样性 2030 - 采伐方法更加环保,受保护森林占总森林面积的 10%;(3)混合生物能源+生物多样性 2030 方案 - 将木材生产、娱乐和自然保护分配到最合适的区域。研究表明,利益相关者参与结合 MELA 和 ToSIA 工具可以成为方案制定的一种有用方法。