El-Khalawany Mohamed A, Abou-Bakr Amany A
Department of Dermatology, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
J Cancer Res Ther. 2013 Oct-Dec;9(4):613-7. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.126456.
Recurrence of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) may form a prognostic problem that couldn't be fully predicted. Although there are different clinical and histologic risk factors for BCC recurrence, few reports are available for the role of biologic markers.
The aim of this study was to assess the value of Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), Ezrin and Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) in recurrence of BCC.
A retrospective controlled study.
Primary tumors of 22 patients who had recurrent basal cell carcinoma (R-BCC) and 22 matched controls that showed non-recurrent basal cell carcinoma (NR-BCC) were collected. Clinical, histopathological, and immunohistochemical results were recorded and analyzed.
SPSS software version 13 and Pearson χ2 test.
R-BCC showed COX-2 expression in 20 (90.9%) cases compared to 13 (59.1%) in NR-BCC with a significant difference (P = 0.04). Moderate to strong intensity was recorded in 13 recurrent and two non-recurrent tumors. Higher frequency for Ezrin immunopositivity was noted in R-BCC (72.7%) than NR-BCC (40.9%), but the difference did not reach the level of significance (P = 0.07). Twelve R-BCC and three NR-BCC revealed moderate to strong staining. For MMP-9, there was no statistically significant difference (P = 1) between recurrent cases (63.6%) and controls (68.2%). No correlation was found between marker expressions and clinical or histologic features of R-BCC.
Biologic markers may have a promising role in assessment of BCC prognosis and early detection of recurrence. High COX-2 expression could be considered as a risk factor of BCC recurrence that can be added to other clinical and histologic factors.
基底细胞癌(BCC)复发可能构成一个无法完全预测的预后问题。尽管存在不同的BCC复发临床和组织学风险因素,但关于生物标志物作用的报道较少。
本研究旨在评估环氧化酶-2(COX-2)、埃兹蛋白和基质金属蛋白酶-9(MMP-9)在BCC复发中的价值。
一项回顾性对照研究。
收集22例复发性基底细胞癌(R-BCC)患者的原发性肿瘤以及22例匹配的显示非复发性基底细胞癌(NR-BCC)的对照。记录并分析临床、组织病理学和免疫组化结果。
SPSS软件13版及Pearson卡方检验。
R-BCC中20例(90.9%)显示COX-2表达,而NR-BCC中为13例(59.1%),差异有统计学意义(P = 0.04)。13例复发性肿瘤和2例非复发性肿瘤记录为中度至强强度。R-BCC中埃兹蛋白免疫阳性频率(72.7%)高于NR-BCC(40.9%),但差异未达到显著水平(P = 0.07)。12例R-BCC和3例NR-BCC显示中度至强染色。对于MMP-9,复发病例(63.6%)与对照组(68.2%)之间无统计学显著差异(P = 1)。未发现标志物表达与R-BCC的临床或组织学特征之间存在相关性。
生物标志物在评估BCC预后和早期复发检测中可能具有重要作用。高COX-2表达可被视为BCC复发的一个风险因素,可添加到其他临床和组织学因素中。