Jacquot Christel M C, Schellen Lisje, Kingma Boris R, van Baak Marleen A, van Marken Lichtenbelt Wouter D
Department of Human Biology, NUTRIM School for Nutrition, Toxicology and Metabolism of Maastricht University Medical Center+, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Department of Human Biology, NUTRIM School for Nutrition, Toxicology and Metabolism of Maastricht University Medical Center+, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands; School of Built Environment and Infrastructure, Avans University of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 1097, 5004 BB Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Physiol Behav. 2014 Apr 10;128:180-7. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.01.025. Epub 2014 Feb 8.
Predicted energy use of dwellings often deviates from the actual energy use. Thermoregulatory behavior of the occupant might explain this difference. Such behavior is influenced by thermal sensation and thermal comfort. These subjective ratings in turn are linked to physiological parameters such as core and skin temperatures. However, it is unclear which physiological parameters best predict thermoregulatory behavior. The objective of this research was to study physiological parameters that potentially can be used to predict thermoregulatory behavior. Sixteen healthy females (18-30 years) were exposed to two dynamic temperature protocols: a gradual increase (+4 K/h, ranging from 24 °C to 32 °C) and a gradual decrease in ambient temperature (-4 K/h, ranging from 24 °C to 16 °C). During the experiments physiological responses, thermal sensation, thermal preference and the intention of thermoregulatory behavior were measured. Thermal sensation is highly correlated with thermal preference (r=-0.933, P<0.001). The skin temperature of the wrist best predicts thermal sensation (R(2)=0.558, P<0.001) and therefore seems useful as a physiological parameter to predict the intention of thermoregulatory behavior. When the subjects are categorized based on their thermal sensation votes, more precise predictions of thermal sensation can be made. This categorization therefore can be of value for the determination of the actual energy use of occupant in dwellings.
住宅的预测能耗往往与实际能耗存在偏差。居住者的体温调节行为可能是造成这种差异的原因。这种行为受热感觉和热舒适度的影响。这些主观评级又与诸如核心温度和皮肤温度等生理参数相关联。然而,尚不清楚哪些生理参数能最好地预测体温调节行为。本研究的目的是探究有可能用于预测体温调节行为的生理参数。16名健康女性(18至30岁)接受了两种动态温度方案:温度逐渐升高(+4K/小时,范围从24°C至32°C)和环境温度逐渐降低(-4K/小时,范围从24°C至16°C)。在实验过程中,测量了生理反应、热感觉、热偏好以及体温调节行为的意向。热感觉与热偏好高度相关(r = -0.933,P < 0.001)。手腕的皮肤温度最能预测热感觉(R(2)=0.558,P < 0.001),因此似乎可作为预测体温调节行为意向的生理参数。当根据受试者的热感觉投票进行分类时,可以对热感觉做出更精确的预测。因此,这种分类对于确定住宅中居住者的实际能耗可能具有价值。