• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高癌症研究试验的多样性:癌症差异研究网络的故事。

Improving diversity in cancer research trials: the story of the Cancer Disparities Research Network.

作者信息

Simon Melissa A, de la Riva Erika E, Bergan Raymond, Norbeck Carrie, McKoy June M, Kulesza Piotr, Dong XinQi, Schink Julian, Fleisher Linda

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 633 N. St. Clair, Suite 1800, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA,

出版信息

J Cancer Educ. 2014 Jun;29(2):366-74. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0617-y.

DOI:10.1007/s13187-014-0617-y
PMID:24519744
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4029870/
Abstract

The participation of racial and ethnic minorities and underserved populations in clinical trials is a critical link between scientific innovation and improvements in health care delivery and health outcomes. However, these population groups continue to be underrepresented in research. We describe the development of the Cancer Disparities Research Network (CDRN) to improve minority and underserved populations' participation in biobanking research. Between February and October 2011, we conducted a regional assessment to identify challenges and opportunities for cancer trials and biobanking research across the CDRN. Representatives from ten CDRN biorepository facilities completed an online survey assessing their facilities' minority biospecimen collection, biobanking practices, and education/outreach initiatives. Representatives of eight facilities also participated in stakeholder interviews. The majority (70%) of facilities reported that specimens were available for research, although only one tenth of these specimens were from non-White patients. Most facilities collected a patient's age, gender, race, medical history, and ethnicity with samples; however, less than half also collected family health history, education level, household income, or primary language spoken. In addition, few institutions collected Asian or Hispanic subgroup information. Only a few reported biospecimen collection outreach programs specifically targeting minority and underserved populations. Biospecimen directors and administrators indicated that funding, biospecimen sharing procedures, and standardization barriers limited their facilities from collaborating in biospecimen collection programs, despite their great interest. These findings suggest that the CDRN can provide opportunities for collaboration, resource sharing, and fostering of research ideas to address cancer disparities in biospecimen research.

摘要

种族和少数族裔以及服务不足人群参与临床试验是科学创新与医疗保健服务及健康结果改善之间的关键环节。然而,这些人群在研究中的代表性仍然不足。我们描述了癌症差异研究网络(CDRN)的发展情况,以提高少数族裔和服务不足人群对生物样本库研究的参与度。在2011年2月至10月期间,我们进行了一项区域评估,以确定CDRN范围内癌症试验和生物样本库研究的挑战和机遇。来自十个CDRN生物样本库设施的代表完成了一项在线调查,评估其设施的少数族裔生物样本采集、生物样本库操作以及教育/外展举措。八个设施的代表还参与了利益相关者访谈。大多数(70%)设施报告称有样本可用于研究,尽管这些样本中只有十分之一来自非白人患者。大多数设施在采集样本时收集了患者的年龄、性别、种族、病史和族裔信息;然而,不到一半的设施还收集了家族健康史、教育水平、家庭收入或主要使用语言。此外,很少有机构收集亚洲或西班牙裔亚组信息。只有少数机构报告了专门针对少数族裔和服务不足人群的生物样本采集外展项目。生物样本库主任和管理人员表示,尽管他们兴趣浓厚,但资金、生物样本共享程序和标准化障碍限制了他们的设施参与生物样本采集项目的合作。这些发现表明,CDRN可以为合作、资源共享和促进研究思路提供机会,以解决生物样本研究中的癌症差异问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8f0/4029870/41876242e827/nihms565501f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8f0/4029870/41876242e827/nihms565501f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8f0/4029870/41876242e827/nihms565501f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving diversity in cancer research trials: the story of the Cancer Disparities Research Network.提高癌症研究试验的多样性:癌症差异研究网络的故事。
J Cancer Educ. 2014 Jun;29(2):366-74. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0617-y.
2
Assessing needs and assets for building a regional network infrastructure to reduce cancer related health disparities.评估构建区域网络基础设施以减少癌症相关健康差距的需求和资产。
Eval Program Plann. 2014 Jun;44:14-25. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2013.12.003. Epub 2013 Dec 26.
3
Enhancing Biospecimen Knowledge Among Health Care Providers and Representatives From Community Organizations.增强医疗保健提供者和社区组织代表的生物样本知识。
Health Promot Pract. 2017 Sep;18(5):715-725. doi: 10.1177/1524839916641069. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
4
Factors associated with biomedical research participation within community-based samples across 3 National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers.与三个美国国家癌症研究所指定癌症中心的社区样本中参与生物医学研究相关的因素。
Cancer. 2020 Mar 1;126(5):1077-1089. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32487. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
5
Racial/Ethnic Differences in Comprehension of Biospecimen Collection: a Nationwide University of Rochester Cancer Center NCI Community Oncology Research Program Study.生物样本采集认知方面的种族/民族差异:罗切斯特大学癌症中心全国性美国国立癌症研究所社区肿瘤学研究项目研究
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Apr;35(2):292-300. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1464-z.
6
Racial-ethnic disparities in stroke care: the American experience: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.种族和民族差异在卒中护理中的表现:美国经验:美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会向医疗保健专业人员的声明。
Stroke. 2011 Jul;42(7):2091-116. doi: 10.1161/STR.0b013e3182213e24. Epub 2011 May 26.
7
Telemedicine Use in Orthopaedic Surgery Varies by Race, Ethnicity, Primary Language, and Insurance Status.在矫形外科中,远程医疗的使用因种族、民族、主要语言和保险状况而异。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Jul 1;479(7):1417-1425. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001775.
8
Enrollment and biospecimen collection in a multiethnic family cohort: the Northern California site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry.一个多民族家庭队列中的入组与生物样本采集:乳腺癌家族登记处北加利福尼亚站点
Cancer Causes Control. 2019 Apr;30(4):395-408. doi: 10.1007/s10552-019-01154-6. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
9
To Share or Not to Share? A Survey of Biomedical Researchers in the U.S. Southwest, an Ethnically Diverse Region.分享还是不分享?对美国西南部一个种族多样化地区的生物医学研究人员的调查。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 17;10(9):e0138239. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138239. eCollection 2015.
10
Minority Participation in Biobanks: An Essential Key to Progress.少数群体参与生物样本库:进步的关键要素。
Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1897:43-50. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8935-5_5.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond Barriers: Achieving True Equity in Cancer Care.突破障碍:实现癌症护理的真正公平。
Curr Oncol. 2025 Jun 12;32(6):349. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32060349.
2
Psychosocial aspects of quality of life outcomes in post-treatment human papillomavirus-associated cancer survivors in the United States: A scoping review.美国人乳头瘤病毒相关癌症幸存者治疗后生活质量结果的社会心理方面:一项范围综述
Health Psychol Open. 2025 Mar 27;12:20551029251327438. doi: 10.1177/20551029251327438. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Socio-ethical challenges and opportunities for advancing diversity, equity, and inclusion in digital medicine.

本文引用的文献

1
A Call to Standardize Preanalytic Data Elements for Biospecimens, Part II.呼吁规范生物样本的分析前数据元素,第二部分。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2015 Sep;139(9):1125-8. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2014-0572-CP. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
2
Community-campus partnership in action: lessons learned from the DuPage County Patient Navigation Collaborative.社区-校园合作实例:从杜佩奇县患者导航协作项目中汲取的经验教训
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2014 Spring;8(1):75-81. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2014.0005.
3
Participation in cancer clinical trials: why are patients not participating?
在数字医学中推进多样性、公平性和包容性所面临的社会伦理挑战与机遇。
Digit Health. 2024 Oct 1;10:20552076241277705. doi: 10.1177/20552076241277705. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
4
Associations Between Race/Ethnicity, Language, and Enrollment on Cancer Research Studies.种族/民族、语言与癌症研究项目入组之间的关联。
Oncologist. 2023 Feb 8;28(2):131-138. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac218.
5
A pilot study of a culturally-appropriate, educational intervention to increase participation in cancer clinical trials among African Americans and Latinos.一项针对非裔美国人和拉丁裔人群、旨在增加其参与癌症临床试验的文化适宜性教育干预的初步研究。
Cancer Causes Control. 2021 Sep;32(9):953-963. doi: 10.1007/s10552-021-01449-7. Epub 2021 May 27.
6
Improving Multi-site Interaction Through Remote Learning Technology: Report from a Training Program to Increase Underrepresented Undergraduate and Medical Students in Health Disparities Research.通过远程学习技术改善多地点互动:增加代表性不足的本科生和医学生参与健康差异研究培训计划的报告。
J Cancer Educ. 2022 Oct;37(5):1466-1471. doi: 10.1007/s13187-021-01985-5. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
7
Blood cancer health disparities in the United States Hispanic population.美国西班牙裔人群中的血液癌症健康差异。
Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud. 2021 Apr 8;7(2). doi: 10.1101/mcs.a005967. Print 2021 Apr.
8
Using a Warm Hand-Off Approach to Enroll African American Caregivers in a Multi-Site Clinical Trial: The Handshake Protocol.采用温馨交接方式招募非裔美国家庭照顾者参与多中心临床试验:握手方案。
J Appl Gerontol. 2022 Jan;41(1):142-147. doi: 10.1177/0733464821992920. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
9
Health Literacy Research in Rural Areas.农村地区的健康素养研究。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2020 Jun 25;269:241-247. doi: 10.3233/SHTI200038.
10
A Qualitative Study Exploring Barriers and Facilitators of Enrolling Underrepresented Populations in Clinical Trials and Biobanking.一项探索临床试验和生物样本库中纳入代表性不足人群的障碍与促进因素的定性研究。
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2019 Apr 30;7:74. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2019.00074. eCollection 2019.
参与癌症临床试验:患者为何不参与?
Med Decis Making. 2014 Jan;34(1):116-26. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13497264. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
4
A systematic review of the factors influencing African Americans' participation in cancer clinical trials.一项系统评价影响非裔美国人参与癌症临床试验的因素。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 Jul;35(2):13-32. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.03.007. Epub 2013 Apr 1.
5
Personalized medicine: challenge and promise.个性化医疗:挑战与前景。
J Cancer Educ. 2012 Apr;27(1 Suppl):S12-7. doi: 10.1007/s13187-012-0322-7.
6
Biospecimens and biorepositories: from afterthought to science.生物标本和生物库:从事后想法到科学。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 Feb;21(2):253-5. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-1179.
7
Biobanking: the foundation of personalized medicine.生物库:个性化医疗的基础。
Curr Opin Oncol. 2011 Jan;23(1):112-9. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0b013e32834161b8.
8
Integrating biobanks: addressing the practical and ethical issues to deliver a valuable tool for cancer research.整合生物库:解决实际和伦理问题,为癌症研究提供有价值的工具。
Nat Rev Cancer. 2010 Sep;10(9):646-51. doi: 10.1038/nrc2913. Epub 2010 Aug 12.
9
AACR-FDA-NCI Cancer Biomarkers Collaborative consensus report: advancing the use of biomarkers in cancer drug development.美国癌症研究协会-美国食品药品监督管理局-美国国立癌症研究所癌症生物标志物合作共识报告:推进生物标志物在癌症药物开发中的应用。
Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Jul 1;16(13):3299-318. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0880. Epub 2010 May 25.
10
Evaluation of Cancer 101: an educational program for native settings.癌症101评估:针对本地环境的教育项目。
J Cancer Educ. 2010 Sep;25(3):329-36. doi: 10.1007/s13187-010-0046-5. Epub 2010 Feb 10.