Suppr超能文献

认知行为疗法和药物疗法对不孕症压力的影响:一项随机对照试验。

The effect of the cognitive behavioral therapy and pharmacotherapy on infertility stress: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Faramarzi Mahbobeh, Pasha Hajar, Esmailzadeh Seddigheh, Kheirkhah Farzan, Heidary Shima, Afshar Zohreh

机构信息

Fatemeh Alzahra Infertility and Reproductive Health Research Center, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.

Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.

出版信息

Int J Fertil Steril. 2013 Oct;7(3):199-206. Epub 2013 Sep 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Infertility has been described as creating a form of stress leading to a variety of psychological problems. Both psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy are effective treatments for infertility stress. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy along with fluoxetine for improvement infertility stress in infertile women.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

:In a randomized controlled clinical trial, 89 infertile women with mild to moderate depression (Beck scores 10-47) were recruited into the following three groups: i. cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), ii. antidepressant therapy, and iii. control group. Twenty-nine participants in the CBT method received gradual relaxation training, restructuring, and eliminating of negative automatic thoughts and dysfunctional attitudes to infertility for 10 sessions. Thirty participants in the pharmacotherapy group took 20 mg fluoxetine daily for 90 days. Thirty individuals in control group did not receive any intervention. All participants completed fertility problem inventory (FPI) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) at the beginning and end of the study. We applied Chi-square paired t test, ANOVA and Turkey's test to analyze the data.

RESULTS

THE MEAN OF THE INFERTILITY STRESS SCORES IN CBT, FLUOXETINE, AND CONTROL GROUPS AT THE BEGINNING AND END OF THE STUDY WERE AS FOLLOWS, RESPECTIVELY: 3.5 ± 0.62 vs.2.7 ± 0.62 (p<0.05), 3.5 ± 0.53 vs.3.2 ± 4.4 (p<0.05), and 3.4 ± 0.55 vs. 3.5 ± 0.48. In CBT group, the mean scores of social concern, sexual concern, marital concern, rejection of child-free lifestyle, and need for parenthood decreased meaningfully compared to those before starting the therapy. But in fluoxetine group, mean score of women sexual concern out of those five main problems of infertility reduced significantly. Also, fluoxetine and CBT reduced depression compared to the control group.

CONCLUSION

CBT improved the social concerns, sexual concerns, marital concerns, rejection of child-free lifestyle, and need for parenthood more than floxitine group. Thus, CBT was not only a reliable alternative to pharmacotherapy, but also superior to fluoxetine in resolving and reducing of infertility stress (Registration Number: IRCT2012061710048N1).

摘要

背景

不孕症被认为会造成一种压力形式,导致各种心理问题。心理治疗和药物治疗都是治疗不孕症压力的有效方法。本研究的目的是评估认知行为疗法联合氟西汀改善不孕女性不孕症压力的效果。

材料与方法

在一项随机对照临床试验中,89名轻度至中度抑郁(贝克评分10 - 47)的不孕女性被纳入以下三组:i. 认知行为疗法(CBT)组;ii. 抗抑郁治疗组;iii. 对照组。采用CBT方法的29名参与者接受了渐进性放松训练、重构以及消除对不孕症的消极自动思维和功能失调态度,共进行10次治疗。药物治疗组的30名参与者每天服用20毫克氟西汀,持续90天。对照组的30名个体未接受任何干预。所有参与者在研究开始和结束时均完成了生育问题量表(FPI)和贝克抑郁量表(BDI)。我们应用卡方配对t检验、方差分析和土耳其检验来分析数据。

结果

研究开始和结束时,CBT组、氟西汀组和对照组的不孕症压力评分均值分别如下:3.5±0.62对2.7±0.62(p<0.05),3.5±0.53对3.2±4.4(p<0.05),以及3.4±0.55对3.5±0.48。在CBT组中,与治疗开始前相比,社会关注、性关注、婚姻关注、对无子女生活方式的排斥以及为人父母的需求等方面的平均得分显著降低。但在氟西汀组中,在不孕症的这五个主要问题中,女性性关注的平均得分显著降低。此外,与对照组相比,氟西汀和CBT都减轻了抑郁症状。

结论

与氟西汀组相比,CBT在改善社会关注、性关注、婚姻关注、对无子女生活方式的排斥以及为人父母的需求等方面效果更显著。因此,CBT不仅是药物治疗的可靠替代方法,而且在解决和减轻不孕症压力方面优于氟西汀(注册号:IRCT2012061710048N1)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70bd/3914487/1cb17cc54bc2/Int-J-Fertil-Steril-7-199-g01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验