• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们能否构建对处方药滥用流行的有效应对措施?在“预防老年疾病项目(PROSPER)试验”中评估普遍预防的成本效益。

Can we build an efficient response to the prescription drug abuse epidemic? Assessing the cost effectiveness of universal prevention in the PROSPER trial.

作者信息

Crowley D Max, Jones Damon E, Coffman Donna L, Greenberg Mark T

机构信息

The Center for Child and Family Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, USA.

The Prevention Research Center for Promotion of Human Development, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16801, USA.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2014 May;62:71-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.01.029. Epub 2014 Feb 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.01.029
PMID:24521531
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4131945/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Prescription drug abuse has reached epidemic proportions. Nonmedical prescription opioid use carries increasingly high costs. Despite the need to cultivate efforts that are both effective and fiscally responsible, the cost-effectiveness of universal evidence-based-preventive-interventions (EBPIs) is rarely evaluated. This study explores the performance of these programs to reduce nonmedical prescription opioid use.

METHODS

Sixth graders from twenty-eight rural public school districts in Iowa and Pennsylvania were blocked by size and geographic location and then randomly assigned to experimental or control conditions (2002-2010). Within the intervention communities, prevention teams selected a universal family and school program from a menu of EBPIs. All families were offered a family-based program in the 6th grade and received one of three school-based programs in 7th-grade. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of each school program by itself and with an additional family-based program were assessed using propensity and marginal structural models.

RESULTS

This work demonstrates that universal school-based EBPIs can efficiently reduce nonmedical prescription opioid use. Further, findings illustrate that family-based programs may be used to enhance the cost-effectiveness of school-based programs.

CONCLUSIONS

Universal EBPIs can effectively and efficiently reduce nonmedical prescription opioid use. These programs should be further considered when developing comprehensive responses to this growing national crisis.

摘要

目的

处方药滥用已达到流行程度。非医疗用途的处方阿片类药物使用成本日益高昂。尽管需要开展既有效又符合财政责任的工作,但普遍的循证预防干预措施(EBPI)的成本效益却很少得到评估。本研究探讨了这些项目在减少非医疗用途处方阿片类药物使用方面的表现。

方法

来自爱荷华州和宾夕法尼亚州28个农村公立学区的六年级学生按规模和地理位置进行分组,然后随机分配到实验组或对照组(2002 - 2010年)。在干预社区内,预防团队从一系列循证预防干预措施中选择了一个面向家庭和学校的通用项目。所有家庭在六年级时都参加了一个基于家庭的项目,并在七年级时接受了三个基于学校的项目之一。使用倾向模型和边际结构模型评估了每个学校项目本身以及与一个额外的基于家庭的项目相结合时的有效性和成本效益。

结果

这项工作表明,普遍的基于学校的循证预防干预措施可以有效减少非医疗用途处方阿片类药物的使用。此外,研究结果表明,基于家庭的项目可用于提高基于学校的项目的成本效益。

结论

普遍的循证预防干预措施可以有效且高效地减少非医疗用途处方阿片类药物的使用。在制定应对这一日益严重的国家危机的全面措施时,应进一步考虑这些项目。

相似文献

1
Can we build an efficient response to the prescription drug abuse epidemic? Assessing the cost effectiveness of universal prevention in the PROSPER trial.我们能否构建对处方药滥用流行的有效应对措施?在“预防老年疾病项目(PROSPER)试验”中评估普遍预防的成本效益。
Prev Med. 2014 May;62:71-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.01.029. Epub 2014 Feb 9.
2
Substance-use outcomes at 18 months past baseline: the PROSPER Community-University Partnership Trial.基线后18个月的物质使用结果:PROSPER社区-大学合作试验
Am J Prev Med. 2007 May;32(5):395-402. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.01.014.
3
PROSPER delivery of universal preventive interventions with young adolescents: long-term effects on emerging adult substance misuse and associated risk behaviors.PROSPER 对青少年普遍预防干预措施的实施效果:对成年早期物质滥用及相关风险行为的长期影响。
Psychol Med. 2017 Oct;47(13):2246-2259. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717000691. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
4
Preventing substance misuse through community-university partnerships: randomized controlled trial outcomes 4½ years past baseline.通过社区-大学伙伴关系预防药物滥用:基线后 4 年半的随机对照试验结果。
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Apr;40(4):440-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.12.012.
5
Long-term effects of universal preventive interventions on prescription drug misuse.通用预防干预措施对处方药滥用的长期影响。
Addiction. 2008 Jul;103(7):1160-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02160.x.
6
Long-term protective factor outcomes of evidence-based interventions implemented by community teams through a community-university partnership.社区团队通过社区-大学伙伴关系实施的循证干预措施的长期保护因素结果。
J Prim Prev. 2009 Sep;30(5):513-30. doi: 10.1007/s10935-009-0189-5. Epub 2009 Aug 11.
7
Economic analysis of methamphetamine prevention effects and employer costs.经济分析甲基苯丙胺预防效果和雇主成本。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2011 Jul;72(4):577-85. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2011.72.577.
8
Substance use outcomes 51/2 years past baseline for partnership-based, family-school preventive interventions.基于伙伴关系的家庭-学校预防干预措施在基线后5.5年的物质使用结果。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008 Jul 1;96(1-2):57-68. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.01.023. Epub 2008 Apr 22.
9
Testing a Model of Universal Prevention Effects on Adolescent Relationships and Marijuana Use as Pathways to Young Adult Outcomes.测试普遍预防对青少年关系和大麻使用的影响模型,以及这些因素对青年期结果的作用途径。
J Youth Adolesc. 2019 Mar;48(3):444-458. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0946-y. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
10
Motives for nonmedical use of prescription opioids among high school seniors in the United States: self-treatment and beyond.美国高中高年级学生非医疗用途使用处方阿片类药物的动机:自我治疗及其他。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Aug;163(8):739-44. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.120.

引用本文的文献

1
Prescription Pain Medication Misuse with and Without Heroin Use Among Adolescents: relationships with Routine Healthcare, Family Support, Academic Performance, Violence, and Other Risky Behaviors.青少年中处方止痛药滥用与是否使用海洛因的情况:与常规医疗保健、家庭支持、学业成绩、暴力及其他危险行为的关系
Subst Use Misuse. 2025;60(9):1400-1410. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2025.2499945. Epub 2025 May 18.
2
Family-Based Interventions to Prevent Substance Use Among Youth: Community Guide Systematic Economic Review.基于家庭的青少年物质使用预防干预措施:《社区指南》系统经济评价
Am J Prev Med. 2025 Jul;69(1):107639. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2025.04.009. Epub 2025 Apr 18.
3
Resource Realities: Exploring the Foundations of Successful Implementation in School-Based Drug Prevention.资源现状:探索在校毒品预防成功实施的基础
J Sch Health. 2024 Dec;94(12):1185-1195. doi: 10.1111/josh.13539. Epub 2024 Dec 25.
4
Substance Use Disorders: Population Prevention.物质使用障碍:人群预防
Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2024 Oct;22(4):505-506. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.24022017. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
5
Integrated Prevention Infrastructure: A Framework for Addressing Social Determinants of Health in Substance Use Policy Making.综合预防基础设施:物质使用政策制定中解决健康社会决定因素的框架。
Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2024 Oct;22(4):483-491. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20240017. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
6
The ABCD and HBCD Studies: Longitudinal Studies to Inform Prevention Science.ABCD和HBCD研究:为预防科学提供信息的纵向研究。
Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2024 Oct;22(4):449-457. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20240016. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
7
A Video Game Intervention to Prevent Opioid Misuse Among Older Adolescents: Development and Preimplementation Study.一项预防大龄青少年阿片类药物滥用的电子游戏干预措施:开发与实施前研究。
JMIR Serious Games. 2023 Nov 3;11:e46912. doi: 10.2196/46912.
8
Health Care Provider Stigma Toward Patients With Substance Use Disorders: Protocol for a Nationally Representative Survey.医疗保健提供者对物质使用障碍患者的污名化:一项全国代表性调查的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Sep 26;12:e47548. doi: 10.2196/47548.
9
A systematic review of economic evaluations for opioid misuse, cannabis and illicit drug use prevention.对阿片类药物滥用、大麻及非法药物使用预防的经济评估的系统评价。
BJPsych Open. 2023 Aug 8;9(5):e149. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2023.515.
10
Sri Lanka's response to prescribed drug misuse: is it enough?斯里兰卡对处方药滥用的应对措施:足够了吗?
BJPsych Int. 2023 Feb;20(1):7-9. doi: 10.1192/bji.2021.54.

本文引用的文献

1
Longitudinal effects of universal preventive intervention on prescription drug misuse: three randomized controlled trials with late adolescents and young adults.普遍性预防干预对处方药滥用的纵向影响:对青少年晚期和年轻成年人的三项随机对照试验。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Apr;103(4):665-72. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301209. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
2
Medical and nonmedical use of prescription opioids among high school seniors in the United States.美国高中高年级学生中处方阿片类药物的医疗和非医疗用途。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012 Sep 1;166(9):797-802. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.85.
3
Extramedical use of prescription pain relievers by youth aged 12 to 21 years in the United States: national estimates by age and by year.美国12至21岁青少年对处方止痛药的非医疗用途:按年龄和年份的全国估计数。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012 Sep 1;166(9):803-7. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.209.
4
Resource consumption of a diffusion model for prevention programs: the PROSPER delivery system.预防项目扩散模型的资源消耗:PROSPER 交付系统。
J Adolesc Health. 2012 Mar;50(3):256-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.07.001. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
5
Cost-effectiveness of long-term outpatient buprenorphine-naloxone treatment for opioid dependence in primary care.长期门诊丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮治疗对初级保健中阿片类药物依赖的成本效益。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27(6):669-76. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1962-8. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
6
Medical misuse of controlled medications among adolescents.青少年中受控药物的医疗滥用情况。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011 Aug;165(8):729-35. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.114.
7
Economic analysis of methamphetamine prevention effects and employer costs.经济分析甲基苯丙胺预防效果和雇主成本。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2011 Jul;72(4):577-85. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2011.72.577.
8
The prescription drug epidemic in the United States: a perfect storm.美国处方药泛滥问题:完美风暴。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2011 May;30(3):264-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2011.00291.x.
9
Curtailing diversion and abuse of opioid analgesics without jeopardizing pain treatment.在不危及疼痛治疗的前提下减少阿片类镇痛药的转移和滥用。
JAMA. 2011 Apr 6;305(13):1346-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.369.
10
Six-year sustainability of evidence-based intervention implementation quality by community-university partnerships: the PROSPER study.社区-大学伙伴关系实施基于证据的干预措施质量的六年可持续性:PROSPER 研究。
Am J Community Psychol. 2011 Dec;48(3-4):412-25. doi: 10.1007/s10464-011-9430-5.