• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

居家护理中严重且需报告事件的识别:一项用于达成共识的德尔菲调查

Identification of serious and reportable events in home care: a Delphi survey to develop consensus.

作者信息

Doran Diane M, Baker G Ross, Szabo Cathy, McShane Julie, Carryer Jennifer

机构信息

Nursing Health Services Research Unit, Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Suite 130, Toronto, ON Canada M5T 1P8.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Apr;26(2):136-43. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu008. Epub 2014 Feb 11.

DOI:10.1093/intqhc/mzu008
PMID:24521705
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess which client events should be considered reportable and preventable in home care (HC) settings in the opinion of HC safety experts.

BACKGROUND

Patient safety in acute care settings has been well documented; however, there are limited data about this issue in HC. While many organizations collect information about 'incidents', there are no standards for reporting and it is challenging to compare incident rates among organizations.

DESIGN

A 29-item electronic survey that included potential HC safety issues was used in a two-round Delphi study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-four pan-Canadian HC safety experts participated in an electronic survey.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Perceived reportability and preventability of patient safety events, HC.

RESULTS

The events that were perceived as being most reportable and preventable included the following: a serious injury related to inappropriate client service plan (e.g. incomplete/inaccurate assessments, poor care plan design, flawed implementation); an adverse reaction requiring emergency room visit or hospitalization related to a medication-related event; a catheter-site infection (e.g. a new peritoneal dialysis infection or peritonitis); any serious event related to care or services that are contrary to current professional or other practice standards (e.g. incorrect treatment regimen, theft, retention of a foreign object in a wound, individual practicing outside scope or competence).

CONCLUSION

These data represent an important step in the development and validation of standard metrics about client safety in HC. The results address an expanding area of health services where there is a need to improve standardization and reporting.

摘要

目的

根据家庭护理(HC)安全专家的意见,评估在家庭护理环境中哪些客户事件应被视为可报告且可预防的。

背景

急性护理环境中的患者安全已有充分记录;然而,关于家庭护理中这一问题的数据有限。虽然许多组织收集“事件”信息,但报告没有标准,且比较各组织间的事件发生率具有挑战性。

设计

在两轮德尔菲研究中使用了包含潜在家庭护理安全问题的29项电子调查问卷。

设置与参与者

24名加拿大全国性的家庭护理安全专家参与了电子调查。

主要观察指标

家庭护理中患者安全事件的可报告性和可预防性。

结果

被认为最具可报告性和可预防性的事件包括以下这些:与不适当的客户服务计划相关的严重伤害(例如评估不完整/不准确、护理计划设计不佳、实施有缺陷);与药物相关事件有关的需要急诊就诊或住院治疗的不良反应;导管部位感染(例如新的腹膜透析感染或腹膜炎);与违反当前专业或其他实践标准的护理或服务相关的任何严重事件(例如治疗方案错误、盗窃、伤口中异物残留、超出范围或能力执业)。

结论

这些数据是家庭护理中客户安全标准指标制定和验证的重要一步。结果涉及卫生服务中一个不断扩大的领域,在该领域需要提高标准化和报告水平。

相似文献

1
Identification of serious and reportable events in home care: a Delphi survey to develop consensus.居家护理中严重且需报告事件的识别:一项用于达成共识的德尔菲调查
Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Apr;26(2):136-43. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu008. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
2
Quality Metrics in Neonatal and Pediatric Critical Care Transport: A National Delphi Project.新生儿及儿科重症监护转运中的质量指标:一项全国性德尔菲项目
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015 Oct;16(8):711-7. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000477.
3
[Handover between home and respite care facilities : Delphi survey within the context of continuity of care for people with dementia].[家庭与临时护理机构之间的交接:痴呆症患者连续性护理背景下的德尔菲调查]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2016 Jul;49(5):429-36. doi: 10.1007/s00391-015-0907-y. Epub 2015 May 14.
4
Adverse events among Ontario home care clients associated with emergency room visit or hospitalization: a retrospective cohort study.安大略省家庭护理客户中与急诊就诊或住院相关的不良事件:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jun 22;13:227. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-227.
5
Data for Improvement and Clinical Excellence: a report of an interrupted time series trial of feedback in home care.改善数据与临床卓越性:一项家庭护理反馈的中断时间序列试验报告
Implement Sci. 2017 May 18;12(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0600-1.
6
Adverse events associated with hospitalization or detected through the RAI-HC assessment among Canadian home care clients.与住院相关的不良事件或在加拿大居家护理客户中通过RAI-HC评估检测到的不良事件。
Healthc Policy. 2013 Aug;9(1):76-88.
7
Examining consensus for a standardised patient assessment in community paramedicine home visits: a RAND/UCLA-modified Delphi Study.社区出诊中标准化患者评估的共识研究:一项 RAND/UCLA 改良 Delphi 研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 7;9(10):e031956. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031956.
8
Consensus principles for wound care research obtained using a Delphi process.采用 Delphi 法获得的伤口护理研究共识原则。
Wound Repair Regen. 2012 May-Jun;20(3):284-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2012.00790.x.
9
Assessing adverse events among home care clients in three Canadian provinces using chart review.使用图表回顾评估三个加拿大省份的家庭护理客户中的不良事件。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Dec;22(12):989-97. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002039. Epub 2013 Jul 4.
10
Development of canadian safety indicators for medication use.加拿大药物使用安全指标的制定。
Healthc Q. 2008;11(3 Spec No.):47-53. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2008.19649.

引用本文的文献

1
Prioritizing supports and services to help older adults age in place: A Delphi study comparing the perspectives of family/friend care partners and healthcare stakeholders.优先考虑支持和服务,以帮助老年人就地安享晚年:一项德尔菲研究,比较了家庭/朋友护理伙伴和医疗保健利益相关者的观点。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 9;16(11):e0259387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259387. eCollection 2021.
2
Analysis of Patient Safety Incidents in Primary Care Reported in an Electronic Registry Application.基层医疗电子报告系统中上报的患者安全事件分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 25;18(17):8941. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18178941.
3
Types and patterns of safety concerns in home care: client and family caregiver perspectives.
居家护理中安全问题的类型与模式:客户及家庭照顾者的观点
Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Apr;28(2):214-20. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw006. Epub 2016 Jan 31.