Quill Caroline M, Ratcliffe Sarah J, Harhay Michael O, Halpern Scott D
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Fostering Improvement in End-of-Life Decision Science(FIELDS) Program at the Leonard Davis Institute Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Chest. 2014 Sep;146(3):573-582. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-2529.
The magnitude and implication of variation in end-of-life decision-making among ICUs in the United States is unknown.
We reviewed data on decisions to forgo life-sustaining therapy (DFLSTs) in 269,002 patients admitted to 153 ICUs in the United States between 2001 and 2009. We used fixed-effects logistic regression to create a multivariable model for DFLST and then calculated adjusted rates of DFLST for each ICU.
Patient factors associated with increased odds of DFLST included advanced age, female sex, white race, and poor baseline functional status (all P < .001). However, associations with several of these factors varied among ICUs (eg, black race had an OR for DFLST from 0.18 to 2.55 across ICUs). The ICU staffing model was also found to be associated with DFLST, with an open ICU staffing model associated with an increased odds of a DFLST (OR = 1.19). The predicted probability of DFLST varied approximately sixfold among ICUs after adjustment for the fixed patient and ICU effects and was directly correlated with the standardized mortality ratios of ICUs (r = 0.53, 0.41-0.68).
Although patient factors explain much of the variability in DFLST practices, significant effects of ICU culture and practice influence end-of-life decision-making. The observation that an ICU's risk-adjusted propensity to withdraw life support is directly associated with its standardized mortality ratio suggests problems with using the latter as a quality measure.
美国重症监护病房(ICU)临终决策的差异程度及其影响尚不清楚。
我们回顾了2001年至2009年间美国153个ICU收治的269,002例患者放弃生命维持治疗(DFLST)的相关数据。我们使用固定效应逻辑回归建立了DFLST的多变量模型,然后计算每个ICU的DFLST调整率。
与DFLST几率增加相关的患者因素包括高龄、女性、白人种族和基线功能状态差(所有P <.001)。然而,这些因素中几个因素的关联在不同ICU之间有所不同(例如,黑人种族的DFLST比值比在不同ICU之间从0.18到2.55不等)。还发现ICU人员配备模式与DFLST相关,开放ICU人员配备模式与DFLST几率增加相关(比值比 = 1.19)。在对固定的患者和ICU效应进行调整后,不同ICU之间DFLST的预测概率相差约6倍,并且与ICU的标准化死亡率直接相关(r = 0.53,0.41 - 0.68)。
尽管患者因素解释了DFLST实践中的大部分变异性,但ICU文化和实践的显著影响会影响临终决策。观察到ICU调整风险后撤回生命支持的倾向与其标准化死亡率直接相关,这表明将后者用作质量衡量标准存在问题。