• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症监护病房获得性血流感染患者放弃生命维持治疗实践的变异性:EUROBACT-2 国际队列的二次分析。

Variability in forgoing life-sustaining treatment practices in critically Ill patients with hospital-acquired bloodstream infections: a secondary analysis of the EUROBACT-2 international cohort.

机构信息

Intensive Care Unit, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2024 Aug 31;28(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05072-1.

DOI:10.1186/s13054-024-05072-1
PMID:39217394
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11365124/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The decision to forgo life-sustaining treatment in intensive care units (ICUs) is influenced by ethical, cultural, and medical factors. This study focuses on a population of patients with hospital-acquired bloodstream infections (HABSI) to investigate the association between patient, pathogen, center and country-level factors and these decisions.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the EUROBACT-2 study (June 2019-January 2021) from 265 centers worldwide, focusing on non-COVID-19 patients who died in the hospital or within 28 days after HABSI. We assessed whether death was preceded by a decision to forgo life-sustaining treatment, examining country, center, patient, and pathogen variables. To assess the association of each potentially important variable with the decision to forgo life-sustaining treatment, univariable mixed logistic regression models with a random center effect were performed.

RESULTS

Among 1589 non-COVID-19 patients, 519 (32.7%) died, with 191 (36.8%) following a decision to forgo life-sustaining treatment. Significant geographical differences were observed, with no reported decisions to forgo life-sustaining treatment in African countries and fewer in the Middle East compared to Western Europe, Australia, and Asia. Once a center effect was considered, only health expenditure (Odds ratio 1.79, 95%CI: 1.45-2.21, p < 0.01) and age (Odds ratio 1.02, 95%CI: 1.002-1.05, p = 0.03) were significantly associated with decisions to forgo life-sustaining treatment, while other patient and pathogen factors were not.

CONCLUSION

Economic and regional disparities significantly impact end-of-life decision-making in ICUs. Global policies should consider these disparities to ensure equitable end-of-life care practices.

摘要

背景

在重症监护病房(ICU)放弃维持生命的治疗的决定受到伦理、文化和医疗因素的影响。本研究关注医院获得性血流感染(HABSI)患者人群,以调查患者、病原体、中心和国家层面因素与这些决策之间的关系。

方法

我们分析了来自全球 265 个中心的 EUROBACT-2 研究(2019 年 6 月至 2021 年 1 月)的数据,重点关注非 COVID-19 患者,这些患者在医院内死亡或 HABSI 后 28 天内死亡。我们评估了死亡是否先于放弃维持生命的治疗的决定,检查了国家、中心、患者和病原体变量。为了评估每个潜在重要变量与放弃维持生命的治疗的决定的关联,我们使用具有随机中心效应的单变量混合逻辑回归模型进行了分析。

结果

在 1589 名非 COVID-19 患者中,有 519 名(32.7%)死亡,其中 191 名(36.8%)在放弃维持生命的治疗的决定后死亡。观察到显著的地理差异,在非洲国家没有报告放弃维持生命的治疗的决定,而在中东国家比在西欧、澳大利亚和亚洲国家报告的决定少。一旦考虑到中心效应,只有卫生支出(优势比 1.79,95%置信区间:1.45-2.21,p<0.01)和年龄(优势比 1.02,95%置信区间:1.002-1.05,p=0.03)与放弃维持生命的治疗的决定显著相关,而其他患者和病原体因素则不相关。

结论

经济和地区差异对 ICU 临终决策有重大影响。全球政策应考虑到这些差异,以确保公平的临终护理实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a0e/11365124/025faa05c4c3/13054_2024_5072_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a0e/11365124/025faa05c4c3/13054_2024_5072_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a0e/11365124/025faa05c4c3/13054_2024_5072_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Variability in forgoing life-sustaining treatment practices in critically Ill patients with hospital-acquired bloodstream infections: a secondary analysis of the EUROBACT-2 international cohort.重症监护病房获得性血流感染患者放弃生命维持治疗实践的变异性:EUROBACT-2 国际队列的二次分析。
Crit Care. 2024 Aug 31;28(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05072-1.
2
End-of-life decision-making in critically ill old patients with and without coronavirus disease 2019.危重病老年患者有无 2019 年冠状病毒病的临终决策。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2024 Jan;68(1):63-70. doi: 10.1111/aas.14326. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
3
Life-sustaining treatment decisions by spouses of patients with Alzheimer's disease.阿尔茨海默病患者配偶做出的维持生命治疗决策。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996 Feb;44(2):144-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb02430.x.
4
Decision-Making on Withholding or Withdrawing Life Support in the ICU: A Worldwide Perspective.重症监护病房中关于停止或撤销生命支持的决策:全球视角
Chest. 2017 Aug;152(2):321-329. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.04.176. Epub 2017 May 5.
5
French intensivists do not apply American recommendations regarding decisions to forgo life-sustaining therapy.法国重症监护医生并不采用美国关于放弃维持生命治疗决策的建议。
Crit Care Med. 2001 Oct;29(10):1887-92. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200110000-00006.
6
Outcomes of Cancer Patients Discharged From ICU After a Decision to Forgo Life-Sustaining Therapies.放弃生命支持治疗后 ICU 出院癌症患者的结局。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Jun;47(6):e454-e460. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003729.
7
Different epidemiology of bloodstream infections in COVID-19 compared to non-COVID-19 critically ill patients: a descriptive analysis of the Eurobact II study.COVID-19 与非 COVID-19 危重症患者血流感染的不同流行病学特征:Eurobact II 研究的描述性分析。
Crit Care. 2022 Oct 18;26(1):319. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04166-y.
8
End-of-life practices in 282 intensive care units: data from the SAPS 3 database.282个重症监护病房的临终医疗实践:来自SAPS 3数据库的数据。
Intensive Care Med. 2009 Apr;35(4):623-30. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1310-6. Epub 2008 Oct 10.
9
Variations in end-of-life practices in intensive care units worldwide (Ethicus-2): a prospective observational study.全球重症监护病房临终实践的差异(Ethicus-2):一项前瞻性观察研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Oct;9(10):1101-1110. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00261-7. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
10
The role of centre and country factors on process and outcome indicators in critically ill patients with hospital-acquired bloodstream infections.中心和国家因素对重症医院获得性血流感染患者的过程和结局指标的作用。
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Jun;50(6):873-889. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07348-0. Epub 2024 Mar 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Limitation of life-sustaining therapies in critically ill patients with COVID-19: a descriptive epidemiological investigation from the COVID-ICU study.对 COVID-19 重症患者进行生命支持治疗的限制:COVID-ICU 研究的描述性流行病学调查。
Crit Care. 2023 Mar 11;27(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04349-1.
2
Epidemiology and outcomes of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections in intensive care unit patients: the EUROBACT-2 international cohort study.重症监护病房获得性血流感染患者的流行病学和结局:EUROBACT-2 国际队列研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2023 Feb;49(2):178-190. doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06944-2. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
3
Variations in end-of-life practices in intensive care units worldwide (Ethicus-2): a prospective observational study.
全球重症监护病房临终实践的差异(Ethicus-2):一项前瞻性观察研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Oct;9(10):1101-1110. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00261-7. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
4
Withholding or withdrawing of life-sustaining therapy in older adults (≥ 80 years) admitted to the intensive care unit.老年(≥80 岁)重症监护病房患者生命支持治疗的暂停或终止。
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Jul;44(7):1027-1038. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5196-7. Epub 2018 May 17.
5
Decision-Making on Withholding or Withdrawing Life Support in the ICU: A Worldwide Perspective.重症监护病房中关于停止或撤销生命支持的决策:全球视角
Chest. 2017 Aug;152(2):321-329. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.04.176. Epub 2017 May 5.
6
Global variability in withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in the intensive care unit: a systematic review.全球重症监护病房中生命维持治疗的 withholding 和 withdrawal 的变异性:一项系统评价。
Intensive Care Med. 2015 Sep;41(9):1572-85. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3810-5. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
7
Assessment of the worldwide burden of critical illness: the intensive care over nations (ICON) audit.评估全球危重病负担:国际重症监护病房调查 (ICON) 审计。
Lancet Respir Med. 2014 May;2(5):380-6. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70061-X. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
8
Variation in decisions to forgo life-sustaining therapies in US ICUs.美国重症监护病房中放弃维持生命治疗决策的差异。
Chest. 2014 Sep;146(3):573-582. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-2529.
9
End-of-life practices in 282 intensive care units: data from the SAPS 3 database.282个重症监护病房的临终医疗实践:来自SAPS 3数据库的数据。
Intensive Care Med. 2009 Apr;35(4):623-30. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1310-6. Epub 2008 Oct 10.
10
End-of-life practices in European intensive care units: the Ethicus Study.欧洲重症监护病房的临终医疗实践:Ethicus研究
JAMA. 2003 Aug 13;290(6):790-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.6.790.