Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, BG Hospital Ludwigshafen, 67071 Ludwigshafen, Germany.
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Feb 15;14:32. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-32.
Accidents are the leading cause of death in adults prior to middle age. The care of severely injured patients is an interdisciplinary challenge. Limited evidence is available concerning pre-hospital trauma care training programs and the advantage of such programs for trauma patients. The effect on trauma care procedures or on the safety of emergency crews on the scene is limited; however, there is a high level of experience and expert opinion.
I - Video-recorded case studies are the basis of an assessment tool and checklist being developed to verify the results of programs to train participants in the care of seriously injured patients, also known as "objective structured clinical examination" (OSCE). The timing, completeness and quality of the individual measures are assessed using appropriate scales. The evaluation of team communication and interaction will be analyzed with qualitative methods and quantified and verified by existing instruments (e.g. the Clinical Team Scale). The developed assessment tool is validated by several experts in the fields of trauma care, trauma research and medical education. II a) In a German emergency medical service, the subjective assessment of paramedics of their pre-hospital care of trauma patients is evaluated at three time points, namely before, immediately after and one year after training. b) The effect of a standardized course concept on the quality of documentation in actual field operations is determined based on three items relevant to patient safety before and after the course. c) The assessment tool will be used to assess the effect of a standardized course concept on procedures and team communication in pre-hospital trauma care using scenario-based case studies.
This study explores the effect of training on paramedics. After successful study completion, further multicenter studies are conceivable, which would evaluate emergency-physician staffed teams. The influence on the patients and prehospital measures should be assessed based on a retrospective analysis of the emergency room data.
German Clinical Trials Register, ID DRKS00004713.
在中年之前,事故是导致成年人死亡的主要原因。严重受伤患者的护理是一项跨学科的挑战。关于院前创伤护理培训计划以及此类计划对创伤患者的优势,可用的证据有限。这些计划对创伤护理程序或现场急救人员的安全性的影响有限;但是,经验和专家意见的水平很高。
I - 视频记录的案例研究是正在开发的评估工具和检查表的基础,该工具和检查表用于验证培训参与者护理严重受伤患者的计划的结果,也称为“客观结构化临床检查”(OSCE)。使用适当的量表评估各个措施的时间,完整性和质量。将使用定性方法分析团队沟通和互动的评估,并使用现有工具(例如临床团队量表)进行量化和验证。开发的评估工具由创伤护理,创伤研究和医学教育领域的几位专家进行验证。II a)在德国急救医疗服务中,在培训前,培训后立即和培训后一年三个时间点评估护理人员对创伤患者的院前护理的主观评估。b)基于课程前后与患者安全相关的三个项目,确定标准化课程概念对实际现场操作中文档记录质量的影响。c)将使用基于案例的案例研究评估评估工具对院前创伤护理中程序和团队沟通的标准化课程概念的影响。
本研究探讨了培训对护理人员的影响。成功完成研究后,可以进行进一步的多中心研究,评估配备急诊医师的人员。应根据对急诊室数据的回顾性分析来评估对患者和院前措施的影响。
德国临床试验注册处,DRKS00004713。