Choi Jimmy, Choi Kee-Hong, Felice Reddy L, Fiszdon Joanna M
Mental Health Services & Policy Research, Columbia University Medical Center, 1051 Riverside Dr, Mailbox 100, New York, NY 10032 USA.
Department of Psychology, Korea University, Sungbuk-Ku, Anam-Dong, Seoul, 136-701, South Korea.
Schizophr Res. 2014 Mar;153(1-3):209-13. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.01.027. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
Despite the important role of motivation in rehabilitation and functional outcomes in schizophrenia, to date, there has been little emphasis on how motivation is assessed. This is important, since different measures may tap potentially discrete motivational constructs, which in turn may have very different associations to important outcomes. In the current study, we used baseline data from 71 schizophrenia spectrum outpatients enrolled in a rehabilitation program to examine the relationship between task-specific motivation, as measured by the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI), and a more general state of volition/initiation, as measured by the three item Quality of Life (QLS) motivation index. We also examined the relationship of these motivation measures to demographic, clinical and functional variables relevant to rehabilitation outcomes. The two motivation measures were not correlated, and participants with low general state motivation exhibited a full range of task-specific motivation. Only the QLS motivation index correlated with variables relevant to rehabilitation outcomes. The lack of associations between QLS motivation index and IMI subscales suggests that constructs tapped by these measures may be divergent in schizophrenia, and specifically that task-specific intrinsic motivation is not contingent on a general state of motivation. That is, even in individuals with a general low motivational state (i.e. amotivation), interventions aimed at increasing task-specific motivation may still be effective. Moreover, the pattern of interrelationships between the QLS motivation index and variables relevant to psychosocial rehabilitation supports its use in treatment outcome studies.
尽管动机在精神分裂症的康复及功能转归中起着重要作用,但迄今为止,对于如何评估动机却鲜有重视。这一点很重要,因为不同的测量方法可能涉及潜在不同的动机结构,而这些结构反过来可能与重要转归有着截然不同的关联。在本研究中,我们使用了参与康复项目的71名精神分裂症谱系门诊患者的基线数据,来检验通过内在动机量表(IMI)测量的特定任务动机与通过生活质量(QLS)动机指数的三个项目测量的更一般的意志/启动状态之间的关系。我们还检验了这些动机测量与康复转归相关的人口统计学、临床及功能变量之间的关系。这两种动机测量不相关,且一般状态动机低的参与者表现出了广泛的特定任务动机。只有QLS动机指数与康复转归相关变量存在关联。QLS动机指数与IMI分量表之间缺乏关联表明,这些测量方法所涉及的结构在精神分裂症中可能是不同的,具体而言,特定任务的内在动机并不取决于一般的动机状态。也就是说,即使是一般动机状态较低(即无动机)的个体,旨在提高特定任务动机的干预措施可能仍然有效。此外,QLS动机指数与心理社会康复相关变量之间的相互关系模式支持其在治疗转归研究中的应用。