Girman Julia C, Jones Margaret T, Matthews Tracey D, Wood Richard J
a Department of Exercise Science and Sports Studies , Springfield College , Springfield , MA , USA.
Eur J Sport Sci. 2014;14(2):151-9. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2013.775351. Epub 2013 Mar 8.
Limited research exists on rest-pause or cluster-set (CS) protocols. Acute effects of a traditional set (TS) and CS protocols of resistance exercise on serum growth hormone (GH), cortisol (C), blood lactate (BL), countermovement vertical jump (CMVJ) and standing long jump (SLJ) were compared. Eleven resistance-trained males (22.9 ± 2.6 year; 176.9 ± 10.6 cm; 78.5 ± 1.6 kg; 12.9 ± 3.1% BF) completed one repetition maximum tests for clean pull (CP), back squat (BS) and bench press (BP). Subjects were then randomly assigned to TS or CS protocols for sessions 2 and 3, and performed CP and BS lifts followed by two circuits of three sets of three exercises. GH, C, BL, CMVJ and SLJ were measured pre-exercise (Pre), mid-exercise following completion of CS or TS protocol (Mid), immediately (IP), 15 (15P) and 30 (30P) minutes post-exercise. Repeated measures ANOVAs examined differences in GH, C, BL, CMVJ and SLJ. No differences (p>0.05) existed between protocols for GH and C. GH levels 15P were elevated (p<0.05) above 30P (15.78 + 4.66 vs. 12.10 + 4.66 µg·L(-1)). C levels 30P were elevated (p<0.05) above Pre (716.85 + 102.56 vs. 524.79 + 75.79 nmol·L(-1)). Interaction (p <0.05) existed between protocol and time for BL; mid-BL was lower for CS than TS (7.69 ± 3.73 vs. 12.78 ± 1.90 mmol·L(-1)). Pooled data for CMVJ and SLJ were greater (p <0.05) across the CS protocol. The less metabolically taxing CS protocol resulted in better sustainability of jump measures.
关于休息-暂停或成组训练（CS）方案的研究有限。比较了传统组训练（TS）和成组训练（CS）方案的抗阻训练对血清生长激素（GH）、皮质醇（C）、血乳酸（BL）、反向纵跳（CMVJ）和立定跳远（SLJ）的急性影响。11名经过抗阻训练的男性（22.9±2.6岁；176.9±10.6厘米；78.5±1.6千克；体脂率12.9±3.1%）完成了高翻（CP）、后深蹲（BS）和卧推（BP）的1次最大重复量测试。然后，受试者在第2和第3次训练中被随机分配到TS或CS方案，并进行CP和BS练习，随后进行两组，每组三个练习动作，共三组。在运动前（Pre）、完成CS或TS方案后的运动中（Mid）、运动结束即刻（IP）、运动后15分钟（15P）和30分钟（30P）测量GH、C、BL、CMVJ和SLJ。采用重复测量方差分析来检验GH、C、BL、CMVJ和SLJ的差异。GH和C在两种方案之间不存在差异（p>0.05）。运动后15分钟时的GH水平高于运动后30分钟（15.78 + 4.66 vs. 12.10 + 4.66微克·升⁻¹，p<0.05）。运动后30分钟时的C水平高于运动前（716.85 + 102.56 vs. 524.79 + 75.79纳摩尔·升⁻¹，p<0.05）。BL在方案和时间之间存在交互作用（p <0.05）；CS方案运动中的BL低于TS方案（7.69±3.73 vs. 12.78±1.90毫摩尔·升⁻¹）。在CS方案中，CMVJ和SLJ的合并数据更大（p <0.05）。代谢负担较小的CS方案导致跳跃指标的可持续性更好。
