Vassy Carine, Rosman Sophia, Rousseau Bénédicte
Université Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, IRIS, EHESS, CNRS, UMR 8156, INSERM U997, 74 rue Marcel Cachin, F-93000 Bobigny, France.
Inserm U750-Cermes, Site CNRS, 7 rue Guy Môquet, F-94801 Villejuif Cedex, France.
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Apr;106:67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.046. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
In industrialised countries, certain biomedical innovations have come into general use, but the ways they are used vary considerably. Prenatal screening techniques for Down's syndrome are a perfect example of this. In 2010, screening rates stood at 61% in England and 84% in France; the previous year the rate was 26% in the Netherlands. The objective of our research, which took place in these three countries between 2008 and 2011, was to explain these differences. In these countries, public authorities focus on women's free access to innovations and on receiving their informed consent. But other aspects of screening policy vary, as do the health systems in which they are implemented. Our study shows that the sociotechnical settings which vary from country to country affected the interactions during the consultations we observed and thus impacted the decision of whether or not to screen.
在工业化国家,某些生物医学创新已得到广泛应用,但它们的使用方式却有很大差异。唐氏综合征的产前筛查技术就是一个很好的例子。2010年,英格兰的筛查率为61%,法国为84%;前一年荷兰的筛查率为26%。我们在2008年至2011年期间在这三个国家开展的研究目的是解释这些差异。在这些国家,公共当局注重妇女免费获得创新技术并获得她们的知情同意。但筛查政策的其他方面存在差异,实施这些政策的卫生系统也各不相同。我们的研究表明,各国不同的社会技术环境影响了我们所观察到的咨询过程中的互动,从而影响了是否进行筛查的决定。