Chang Chiew Sinn, Al-Awadi Sarah, Ready Derren, Noar Joseph
Orthodontic Department, Eastman Dental Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Microbiology Department, Eastman Dental Institute, University College London, London, UK.
J Orthod. 2014 Jun;41(2):110-7. doi: 10.1179/1465313313Y.0000000088. Epub 2014 Feb 17.
To determine the effectiveness of mechanical and chemical cleaning on the removal of microorganisms from Essix orthodontic retainers.
In vitro laboratory study.
Department of Orthodontics and Microbiology, Eastman Dental Institute, University College London, UK.
Study 1: 120 Essix retainers were divided into four cleaning groups. The effectiveness of each cleaning method to remove a single species biofilm of Streptococcus mutans from the retainer was assessed. Study 2: 140 Essix retainers were divided into four study groups (brushing with fluoride toothpaste, chlorhexidine gel, immersion in chlorhexidine solution only and a control) to investigate the chemical and mechanical cleaning of the multispecies biolfilm of (Streptococcus sanguis, Actinomyces naeslundii, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans).
In study 1, brushing with toothpaste resulted in 99% reduction of Streptococcus mutans. In study 2, all three cleaning methods recorded similarly statistically significant reductions in colony forming units per millilitre compared to the control. There were no statistically significant differences between any of the cleaning groups for any of the microorganisms except MRSA-16. For MRSA-16, chlorhexidine mouthwash and gel were significantly more potent in eliminating the microorganism than the fluoride toothpaste.
All three cleaning methods effectively removed 99% of microorganisms from the Essix retainers. Brushing with fluoride toothpaste can therefore be confirmed as an effective method for cleaning retainers in most circumstances. The use of chlorhexidine gel or mouthwash is recommended in patients where bacterial infection has to be avoided due to immunosuppression or other reasons.
确定机械清洁和化学清洁对从Essix正畸保持器上去除微生物的有效性。
体外实验室研究。
英国伦敦大学学院伊斯特曼牙科研究所正畸科和微生物科。
研究1:将120个Essix保持器分为四个清洁组。评估每种清洁方法从保持器上去除变形链球菌单一物种生物膜的有效性。研究2:将140个Essix保持器分为四个研究组(用含氟牙膏刷牙、洗必泰凝胶、仅浸泡在洗必泰溶液中以及一个对照组),以研究对(血链球菌、内氏放线菌、耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和白色念珠菌)多物种生物膜的化学和机械清洁。
在研究1中,用牙膏刷牙使变形链球菌减少了99%。在研究2中,与对照组相比,所有三种清洁方法在每毫升菌落形成单位方面均记录到统计学上显著的减少。除MRSA - 16外,任何清洁组对任何微生物之间均无统计学上的显著差异。对于MRSA - 16,洗必泰漱口水和凝胶在消除该微生物方面比含氟牙膏显著更有效。
所有三种清洁方法均能有效从Essix保持器上去除99%的微生物。因此,可以确认在大多数情况下用含氟牙膏刷牙是清洁保持器的有效方法。对于因免疫抑制或其他原因必须避免细菌感染的患者,建议使用洗必泰凝胶或漱口水。