Gupta M K, Whitaker J N, Johnson C, Goren H
Department of Immunopathology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH 44195-5131.
Ann Neurol. 1988 Mar;23(3):274-80. doi: 10.1002/ana.410230310.
To measure myelin basic protein (MBP)-like material in cerebrospinal fluid, we compared two radioimmunoassays, both using the same antiserum to MBP but one using peptide (45-89) as the radioligand and standard (peptide assay), and the other using purified MBP as the radioligand and standard (MBP assay), with respect to their diagnostic sensitivity. Cerebrospinal fluid specimens from 185 patients with definite multiple sclerosis (MS) (n = 27), possible MS (n = 63), probable MS (n = 24), and other neurological disease (n = 71) were analyzed using both assays. The diagnostic sensitivity of the peptide assay was significantly better than that of the MBP assay in those with definite MS (sensitivity 59% and 30%, respectively); there was no significant difference in specificity. The peptide assay also showed better correlation with disease activity than the MBP assay: 14 patients classified as having active MS showed significantly higher sensitivity (78.6% versus 38%, p less than 0.04) when compared to patients with inactive disease. The MBP assay showed no significant difference between these two groups. Besides the increase in sensitivity, the actual molar concentrations of immunoreactive MBP detected using this peptide assay were considerably higher than those found using the MBP assay. These results show that the use of MBP antisera capable of recognizing epitopes present in the carboxyl half of MBP peptide (45-89) results in more sensitive detection of immunoreactive MBP when used with MBP peptide (45-89) as radiolabeled ligand in the assay.
为了测定脑脊液中髓鞘碱性蛋白(MBP)样物质,我们比较了两种放射免疫分析方法,这两种方法均使用相同的抗MBP血清,但一种使用肽(45 - 89)作为放射性配体和标准品(肽分析法),另一种使用纯化的MBP作为放射性配体和标准品(MBP分析法),比较它们的诊断敏感性。使用这两种分析法对185例患者的脑脊液标本进行了分析,这些患者包括明确的多发性硬化症(MS)患者(n = 27)、可能的MS患者(n = 63)、疑似MS患者(n = 24)以及其他神经系统疾病患者(n = 71)。在明确的MS患者中,肽分析法的诊断敏感性显著高于MBP分析法(敏感性分别为59%和30%);特异性无显著差异。与MBP分析法相比,肽分析法与疾病活动度的相关性也更好:与疾病不活动的患者相比,14例被归类为患有活动性MS的患者显示出显著更高的敏感性(78.6%对38%,p小于0.04)。MBP分析法在这两组之间未显示出显著差异。除了敏感性增加外,使用这种肽分析法检测到的免疫反应性MBP的实际摩尔浓度明显高于使用MBP分析法所发现的浓度。这些结果表明,当在分析中使用MBP肽(45 - 89)作为放射性标记配体时,使用能够识别MBP肽(45 - 89)羧基端存在的表位的MBP抗血清可更灵敏地检测免疫反应性MBP。