Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Arlington.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio.
Am Psychol. 2014 Feb-Mar;69(2):119-30. doi: 10.1037/a0035514.
Chronic pain is a significant and costly problem in the United States as well as throughout the industrialized world. Unfortunately, there have been concerns about the effectiveness of traditional medical interventions, suggesting the need for alternative chronic pain treatment strategies. However, the introduction of the biopsychosocial model of pain during the past decade stimulated the development of more therapeutically effective and cost-effective interdisciplinary chronic pain management programs. In the present article we briefly review the history of pain management, discuss the major components of a "true" interdisciplinary pain management program, focus on the evidence-based outcomes that have documented the effectiveness of such interdisciplinary pain management programs, and note the barriers that have blocked the wider use of such programs. Finally, we discuss future directions in interdisciplinary pain management.
慢性疼痛是美国乃至整个工业化世界的一个重大且代价高昂的问题。不幸的是,人们对传统医学干预的有效性一直存在担忧,这表明需要采取替代慢性疼痛治疗策略。然而,在过去十年中,疼痛的生物心理社会模型的引入刺激了更具治疗效果和成本效益的跨学科慢性疼痛管理方案的发展。在本文中,我们简要回顾了疼痛管理的历史,讨论了“真正”跨学科疼痛管理方案的主要组成部分,重点介绍了已记录此类跨学科疼痛管理方案有效性的基于证据的结果,并指出了阻碍此类方案更广泛使用的障碍。最后,我们讨论了跨学科疼痛管理的未来方向。