Dirks Melanie A, Weersing V Robin, Warnick Erin, Gonzalez Araceli, Alton Megan, Dauser Christine, Scahill Lawrence, Woolston Joseph
Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014 Mar;55(3):284-91. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12159. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
We characterized parent-youth disagreement in their report on the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED) and examined the equivalence of this measure across parent and youth report.
A clinically referred sample of 408 parent-youth dyads (M age youth = 14.33, SD = 1.89; 53.7% male; 50.0% Non-Hispanic White (NHW), 14.0% Hispanic, 29.7% African-American) completed the SCARED. We examined (a) differences between parents and youth in the total number of symptoms reported (difference scores) and in their ratings of specific symptoms (q correlations), (b) demographic factors associated with these indices, and (c) equivalence of the pattern and magnitude of factor loadings (i.e., configural and metric invariance), as well as item thresholds and residual variances, across informants.
The mean difference score was -2.13 (SD = 14.44), with youth reporting higher levels of symptoms, and the mean q correlation was .32 (SD = .24). Difference scores were greater for African-American dyads than NHW pairs. We found complete configural, metric, and residual invariance, and partial threshold invariance. Differences in thresholds did not appear to reflect systematic differences between parent and youth report. Findings were comparable when analyses were conducted separately for NHW and ethnic minority families.
Findings provide further evidence for the importance of considering youth report when evaluating anxiety in African-American families. The SCARED was invariant across informant reports, suggesting that it is appropriate to compare mean scores for these raters and that variability in parent and youth report is not attributable to their rating different constructs or using different thresholds to determine when symptoms are present.
我们对儿童焦虑相关情绪障碍筛查量表(SCARED)报告中的亲子分歧进行了特征描述,并检验了该量表在父母报告和青少年报告中的等效性。
一个由408对亲子组成的临床转诊样本(青少年平均年龄 = 14.33,标准差 = 1.89;53.7%为男性;50.0%为非西班牙裔白人(NHW),14.0%为西班牙裔,29.7%为非裔美国人)完成了SCARED量表测评。我们检验了:(a)父母和青少年报告的症状总数差异(差异分数)以及他们对特定症状的评分差异(q相关性);(b)与这些指标相关的人口统计学因素;(c)跨报告者的因子载荷模式和大小的等效性(即构型不变性和度量不变性),以及项目阈值和残差方差。
平均差异分数为 -2.13(标准差 = 14.44),青少年报告的症状水平更高,平均q相关性为0.32(标准差 = 0.24)。非裔美国亲子对的差异分数大于非西班牙裔白人亲子对。我们发现了完全的构型、度量和残差不变性,以及部分阈值不变性。阈值差异似乎并未反映父母报告和青少年报告之间的系统性差异。对非西班牙裔白人和少数族裔家庭分别进行分析时,结果具有可比性。
研究结果进一步证明了在评估非裔美国家庭的焦虑情况时考虑青少年报告的重要性。SCARED量表在不同报告者之间具有不变性,这表明比较这些评分者的平均分数是合适的,并且父母和青少年报告中的差异并非源于他们对不同结构的评分或使用不同阈值来确定症状是否存在。