Experimental Psychology, University of Groningen, 9712 TS Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Neurosci. 2014 Feb 19;34(8):2931-9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2523-13.2014.
It is often argued that climbing neural activity, as for example reflected by the contingent negative variation (CNV) in the electroencephalogram, is the signature of the subjective experience of time. According to this view, the resolution of the CNV coincides with termination of subjective timing processes. Paradoxically, behavioral data indicate that participants keep track of timing even after the standard interval (SI) has passed. This study addresses whether timing continues after CNV resolution. In Experiment 1, human participants were asked to discriminate time intervals while evoked potentials (EPs) elicited by the sound terminating a comparison interval (CI) were measured. As the amplitude of N1P2 components increases as a function of the temporal distance from the SI, and the latency of the P2 component followed the hazard rate of the CIs, timing processes continue after CNV resolution. Based on a novel experimental paradigm, statistical model comparisons and trial-by-trial analyses, Experiment 2 supports this finding as subjective time is more accurately indexed by the amplitude of early EPs than by CNV amplitude. These results provide the first direct evidence that subjective timing of multisecond intervals does not depend on climbing neural activity as indexed by the CNV and that the subjective experience of time is better reflected by distinct features of post-CI evoked potentials.
人们常认为,神经活动的攀升,例如脑电图中的条件负变(CNV)所反映的,是主观时间体验的特征。根据这种观点,CNV 的分辨率与主观计时过程的终止相一致。矛盾的是,行为数据表明,即使在标准间隔(SI)过去之后,参与者仍在跟踪时间。本研究探讨了 CNV 分辨率之后是否还在继续计时。在实验 1 中,要求人类参与者在测量比较间隔(CI)结束时发出的声音引起的诱发电位(EP)的同时辨别时间间隔。由于 N1P2 成分的振幅随着与 SI 的时间距离的增加而增加,并且 P2 成分的潜伏期遵循 CI 的危险率,因此 CNV 分辨率之后仍在继续计时。基于新颖的实验范式、统计模型比较和逐次分析,实验 2 支持了这一发现,因为早期 EP 的振幅比 CNV 振幅更准确地反映了主观时间。这些结果首次直接证明,多秒间隔的主观计时并不依赖于 CNV 所指示的神经活动的攀升,并且主观时间体验可以通过 CI 后诱发的电位的独特特征更好地反映出来。