Cumba Ricardo J, Nagi Kundandeep S, Bell Nicholas P, Blieden Lauren S, Chuang Alice Z, Mankiewicz Kimberly A, Feldman Robert M
Ruiz Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, 6431 Fannin Street, MSB 7.024, Houston, TX 77030, USA ; Ophthalmology Department, Medical School, University of Puerto Rico, Medical Science Campus, P.O. Box 365067, San Juan, PR 00936, USA.
Ruiz Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, 6431 Fannin Street, MSB 7.024, Houston, TX 77030, USA ; Department of Ophthalmology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, Mail Code 6230, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.
ISRN Ophthalmol. 2013 Jun 26;2013:828972. doi: 10.1155/2013/828972. eCollection 2013.
Purpose. To evaluate outcomes of peripheral iridotomy (PI) for initial management of primary angle closure suspects (PACS), chronic primary angle closure (CPAC), and chronic primary angle closure glaucoma (CPACG). Patients and Methods. Seventy-nine eyes with PACS, CPAC, or CPACG and better than 20/50 visual acuity that underwent PI as initial management were included. Eyes with previous acute angle closure attacks, laser trabeculoplasties, surgeries, or intraocular injections were excluded. Additional treatments, glaucomatous progression, intraocular pressure, visual acuity, and the number of medications were evaluated. Results. The mean followup was 57.1 ± 29.0 months (range 13.8-150.6 months). Sixty-eight eyes (86.1%) underwent additional medical, laser, or surgical treatment. Forty eyes (50.6%) underwent lens extraction due to reduced visual acuity. The mean 10× logMAR visual acuity score for all patients significantly declined from 0.94 ± 1.12 at baseline to 1.83 ± 3.49 (N = 79, P = 0.0261) at the last followup. Conclusions. Most patients who undergo PI for CPAC spectrum will require additional intervention for either IOP lowering or improvement of visual acuity. This suggests that a procedure that not only deepens the angle but also lowers IOP and improves visual acuity would be desirable as further intervention could be avoided. Evaluation of techniques that achieve all 3 goals is warranted.
目的。评估周边虹膜切开术(PI)对原发性房角关闭疑似病例(PACS)、慢性原发性房角关闭(CPAC)和慢性原发性房角关闭型青光眼(CPACG)进行初始治疗的效果。患者与方法。纳入79例接受PI作为初始治疗且视力优于20/50的PACS、CPAC或CPACG患者。排除既往有急性房角关闭发作、激光小梁成形术、手术或眼内注射史的患者。评估额外治疗、青光眼进展、眼压、视力及用药数量。结果。平均随访时间为57.1±29.0个月(范围13.8 - 150.6个月)。68只眼(86.1%)接受了额外的药物、激光或手术治疗。40只眼(50.6%)因视力下降接受了晶状体摘除术。所有患者的平均10×logMAR视力评分从基线时的0.94±1.12显著下降至末次随访时的1.83±3.49(N = 79,P = 0.0261)。结论。大多数接受PI治疗CPAC谱系疾病的患者需要进行额外干预以降低眼压或改善视力。这表明一种既能加深房角又能降低眼压并改善视力的手术将是理想的,因为这样可以避免进一步干预。有必要评估能实现所有这三个目标的技术。