Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Western Ontario, 1201 Western Road, London, ON, N6G 1H1, Canada,
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jun;472(6):1972-81. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3514-0. Epub 2014 Feb 22.
A web-based followup assessment may be a feasible, cost-saving alternative of tracking patient outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. However, before implementing a web-based program, it is important to determine patient satisfaction levels with the new followup method. Satisfaction with the care received is becoming an increasingly important metric, and we do not know to what degree patients are satisfied with an approach to followup that does not involve an in-person visit with their surgeons.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined (1) patient satisfaction and (2) patients' preferences for followup method (web-based or in-person) after total joint arthroplasty.
We randomized patients who were at least 12 months after primary THA or TKA to complete a web-based followup or to have their appointment at the clinic. There were 410 eligible patients contacted for the study during the recruitment period. Of these, 256 agreed to participate, and a total of 229 patients completed the study (89% of those enrolled, 56% of those potentially eligible; 111 in the usual-care group, 118 in the web-based group). Their mean age was 69 years (range, 38-86 years). There was no crossover between groups. All 229 patients completed a satisfaction questionnaire at the time of their followup appointments. Patients in the web-based group also completed a satisfaction and preference questionnaire 1 year later. Only patients from the web-based group were asked to indicate preference as they had experienced the web-based and in-person followup methods. We used descriptive statistics to summarize the satisfaction questionnaires and compared results using Pearson's chi-square test.
Ninety-one patients (82.0%) in the usual-care group indicated that they were either extremely or very satisfied with the followup process compared with 90 patients (75.6%) who were in the web-based group (p < 0.01; odds ratio [OR] = 3.95; 95% CI, 1.79-8.76). Similarly, patients in the usual care group were more satisfied with the care they received from their surgeon, compared with patients in the web-based group (92.8% versus 73.9%; p < 0.01, OR = 1.37; 95% CI, 0.73-2.57). Forty-four percent of patients preferred the web-based method, 36% preferred the usual method, and 16% had no preference (p = 0.01).
Our results show moderate to high satisfaction levels with a web-based followup assessment. Patients who completed the usual method of in-person followup assessment reported greater satisfaction; however, the difference was small and may not outweigh the additional cost and time-saving benefits of the web-based followup method.
Level I, therapeutic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
基于网络的随访评估可能是一种可行的、节省成本的方法,可以跟踪全关节置换术后患者的结局。然而,在实施基于网络的方案之前,确定患者对新随访方法的满意度水平非常重要。患者对所接受护理的满意度正成为一个越来越重要的指标,我们不知道患者对不涉及与外科医生面对面随访的方法的满意度程度。
我们旨在确定(1)全髋关节置换术(THA)或全膝关节置换术(TKA)后患者的满意度,以及(2)患者对随访方法(基于网络或面对面)的偏好。
我们随机将至少在初次 THA 或 TKA 后 12 个月的患者分为完成基于网络的随访或在诊所预约。在招募期间,共有 410 名符合条件的患者被联系参加该研究。其中,256 名同意参与,共有 229 名患者完成了研究(占入组患者的 89%,潜在合格患者的 56%;常规护理组 111 名,基于网络组 118 名)。他们的平均年龄为 69 岁(范围,38-86 岁)。两组间无交叉。所有 229 名患者在随访预约时均完成了满意度问卷。基于网络组的患者还在 1 年后完成了满意度和偏好问卷。只有基于网络组的患者被要求表明偏好,因为他们已经体验了基于网络和面对面的随访方法。我们使用描述性统计来总结满意度问卷,并使用 Pearson 卡方检验比较结果。
常规护理组的 91 名患者(82.0%)表示他们对随访过程非常满意或非常满意,而基于网络组的 90 名患者(75.6%)表示非常满意(p<0.01;比值比[OR] = 3.95;95%置信区间[CI],1.79-8.76)。同样,常规护理组的患者对他们从外科医生那里获得的护理更满意,而基于网络组的患者则不满意(92.8%对 73.9%;p<0.01,OR = 1.37;95%CI,0.73-2.57)。44%的患者更喜欢基于网络的方法,36%的患者更喜欢常规方法,16%的患者没有偏好(p=0.01)。
我们的研究结果表明,基于网络的随访评估得到了中等至高度的满意度。完成常规面对面随访评估的患者报告了更高的满意度;然而,差异很小,并且可能不会超过基于网络的随访方法的额外成本和节省时间的优势。
I 级,治疗性研究。请参阅作者说明,以获取完整的证据等级描述。