Suppr超能文献

出生间隔与小于胎龄儿、早产以及新生儿和婴儿死亡率的关联:一项荟萃分析。

The associations of birth intervals with small-for-gestational-age, preterm, and neonatal and infant mortality: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Kozuki Naoko, Lee Anne C C, Silveira Mariangela F, Victora Cesar G, Adair Linda, Humphrey Jean, Ntozini Robert, Black Robert E, Katz Joanne

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2013;13 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-S3-S3. Epub 2013 Sep 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Short and long birth intervals have previously been linked to adverse neonatal outcomes. However, much of the existing literature uses cross-sectional studies, from which deriving causal inference is complex. We examine the association between short/long birth intervals and adverse neonatal outcomes by calculating and meta-analyzing associations using original data from cohort studies conducted in low-and middle-income countries (LMIC).

METHODS

We identified five cohort studies. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were calculated for each study, with birth interval as the exposure and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) and/or preterm birth, and neonatal and infant mortality as outcomes. The associations were controlled for potential confounders and meta-analyzed.

RESULTS

Birth interval of shorter than 18 months had statistically significant increased odds of SGA (pooled aOR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.31-1.75), preterm (pooled aOR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.19-2.10) and infant mortality (pooled aOR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.19-2.81) after controlling for potential confounding factors (reference 36-<60 months). It was also significantly associated with term-SGA, preterm-appropriate-for-gestational-age, and preterm-SGA. Birth interval over 60 months had increased risk of SGA (pooled aOR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.07-1.39) and term-SGA (pooled aOR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.03-1.27), but was not associated with other outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Birth intervals shorter than 18 months are significantly associated with SGA, preterm birth and death in the first year of life. Lack of access to family planning interventions thus contributes to the burden of adverse birth outcomes and infant mortality in LMICs. Programs and policies must assess ways to provide equitable access to reproductive health interventions to mothers before or soon after delivering a child, but also address underlying socioeconomic factors that may modify and worsen the effect of short intervals.

摘要

背景

既往研究表明,较短和较长的生育间隔均与不良新生儿结局相关。然而,现有文献大多采用横断面研究,从中推导因果推断较为复杂。我们通过计算和荟萃分析来自低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)队列研究的原始数据,来研究短/长生育间隔与不良新生儿结局之间的关联。

方法

我们确定了五项队列研究。计算每项研究的调整优势比(aOR),以生育间隔为暴露因素,以小于胎龄儿(SGA)和/或早产以及新生儿和婴儿死亡率为结局。对这些关联进行潜在混杂因素控制并进行荟萃分析。

结果

在控制潜在混杂因素后(参考组为36 - <60个月),生育间隔短于18个月与SGA(合并aOR:1.51,95%CI:1.31 - 1.75)、早产(合并aOR:1.58,95%CI:1.19 - 2.10)和婴儿死亡率(合并aOR:1.83,95%CI:1.19 - 2.81)的优势比显著增加相关。它还与足月SGA、早产适于胎龄儿和早产SGA显著相关。生育间隔超过60个月会增加SGA(合并aOR:1.22,95%CI:1.07 - 1.39)和足月SGA(合并aOR:1.14,95%CI:1.03 - 1.27)的风险,但与其他结局无关。

结论

生育间隔短于18个月与SGA、早产和生命第一年的死亡显著相关。因此,无法获得计划生育干预措施导致了LMICs不良出生结局和婴儿死亡率的负担。项目和政策必须评估如何在母亲分娩前或分娩后不久为其提供公平的生殖健康干预措施,同时还要解决可能改变并加剧短生育间隔影响的潜在社会经济因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd24/3847557/26bdb32ee0f4/1471-2458-13-S3-S3-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验