Suppr超能文献

产次和产妇年龄与小于胎龄儿、早产以及新生儿和婴儿死亡率的关联:一项荟萃分析。

The associations of parity and maternal age with small-for-gestational-age, preterm, and neonatal and infant mortality: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Kozuki Naoko, Lee Anne C C, Silveira Mariangela F, Sania Ayesha, Vogel Joshua P, Adair Linda, Barros Fernando, Caulfield Laura E, Christian Parul, Fawzi Wafaie, Humphrey Jean, Huybregts Lieven, Mongkolchati Aroonsri, Ntozini Robert, Osrin David, Roberfroid Dominique, Tielsch James, Vaidya Anjana, Black Robert E, Katz Joanne

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2013;13 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-S3-S2. Epub 2013 Sep 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have reported on adverse neonatal outcomes associated with parity and maternal age. Many of these studies have relied on cross-sectional data, from which drawing causal inference is complex. We explore the associations between parity/maternal age and adverse neonatal outcomes using data from cohort studies conducted in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC).

METHODS

Data from 14 cohort studies were included. Parity (nulliparous, parity 1-2, parity ≥ 3) and maternal age (<18 years, 18-<35 years, ≥ 35 years) categories were matched with each other to create exposure categories, with those who are parity 1-2 and age 18-<35 years as the reference. Outcomes included small-for-gestational-age (SGA), preterm, neonatal and infant mortality. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were calculated per study and meta-analyzed.

RESULTS

Nulliparous, age <18 year women, compared with women who were parity 1-2 and age 18-<35 years had the highest odds of SGA (pooled adjusted OR: 1.80), preterm (pooled aOR: 1.52), neonatal mortality (pooled aOR: 2.07), and infant mortality (pooled aOR: 1.49). Increased odds were also noted for SGA and neonatal mortality for nulliparous/age 18-<35 years, preterm, neonatal, and infant mortality for parity ≥ 3/age 18-<35 years, and preterm and neonatal mortality for parity ≥ 3/≥ 35 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Nulliparous women <18 years of age have the highest odds of adverse neonatal outcomes. Family planning has traditionally been the least successful in addressing young age as a risk factor; a renewed focus must be placed on finding effective interventions that delay age at first birth. Higher odds of adverse outcomes are also seen among parity ≥ 3 / age ≥ 35 mothers, suggesting that reproductive health interventions need to address the entirety of a woman's reproductive period.

FUNDING

Funding was provided by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (810-2054) by a grant to the US Fund for UNICEF to support the activities of the Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group.

摘要

背景

既往研究报道了与产次和母亲年龄相关的不良新生儿结局。这些研究大多依赖横断面数据,从中进行因果推断很复杂。我们使用在低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)开展的队列研究数据,探讨产次/母亲年龄与不良新生儿结局之间的关联。

方法

纳入了14项队列研究的数据。将产次(未生育、产次1 - 2、产次≥3)和母亲年龄(<18岁、18 - <35岁、≥35岁)类别相互匹配以创建暴露类别,以产次1 - 2且年龄18 - <35岁的人群作为对照。结局包括小于胎龄儿(SGA)、早产、新生儿及婴儿死亡率。每项研究计算调整后的比值比(aOR)并进行荟萃分析。

结果

与产次1 - 2且年龄18 - <35岁的女性相比,未生育且年龄<18岁的女性发生SGA(合并调整后OR:1.80)、早产(合并aOR:1.52)、新生儿死亡率(合并aOR:2.07)和婴儿死亡率(合并aOR:1.49)的几率最高。未生育/年龄18 - <35岁的女性发生SGA和新生儿死亡率增加,产次≥3/年龄18 - <35岁的女性发生早产、新生儿及婴儿死亡率增加,产次≥3/≥35岁的女性发生早产和新生儿死亡率增加也有记录。

结论

<18岁的未生育女性发生不良新生儿结局的几率最高。传统上,计划生育在将年轻年龄作为危险因素加以应对方面最不成功;必须重新重视寻找有效的干预措施来延迟首次生育年龄。产次≥3/年龄≥35岁的母亲发生不良结局的几率也较高,这表明生殖健康干预需要覆盖女性整个生育期。

资助

由比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会(810 - 2054)提供资金,通过向美国联合国儿童基金会基金拨款,以支持儿童健康流行病学参考小组的活动。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8803/3847520/a8975f47bb52/1471-2458-13-S3-S2-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验