• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食物过敏急诊就诊情况的多中心研究。

Multicenter study of emergency department visits for food allergies.

作者信息

Clark Sunday, Bock S Allan, Gaeta Theodore J, Brenner Barry E, Cydulka Rita K, Camargo Carlos A

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass, USA.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004 Feb;113(2):347-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2003.10.053.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2003.10.053
PMID:14767453
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Relatively little is known about the characteristics of patients who visit the emergency department (ED) for an acute allergic reaction. Although anaphylaxis guidelines suggest treatment with epinephrine, teaching about self-injectable epinephrine, and referral to an allergist, current ED management remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to describe the management of food-related acute allergic reactions.

METHODS

The Multicenter Airway Research Collaboration performed a chart review study in 21 North American EDs. Investigators reviewed a random sample of 678 charts of patients who presented with food allergy (International Classification of Diseases-ninth revision codes 693.1, 995.0, 995.3, and 995.60-995.69).

RESULTS

Patients had an average age of 29 years; the cohort was 57% female and 40% white. A variety of foods provoked the allergic reaction, including nuts (21%), crustaceans (19%), fruit (12%), and fish (10%). Although exposure to these foods can be life threatening, only 18% of patients came to the ED by ambulance. In the ED, 72% of patients received antihistamines, 48% received systemic corticosteroids, and 16% received epinephrine; 33% received respiratory treatments such as inhaled albuterol. Among patients with severe reactions (55% of total), 24% received epinephrine. Overall, 97% of patients were discharged to home. At ED discharge, 16% of patients were prescribed self-injectable epinephrine, and 12% were referred to an allergist.

CONCLUSIONS

Although guidelines suggest specific approaches for the management of acute allergic reactions, ED concordance for food allergy appears low. These findings support a new collaboration between professional organizations in allergy and emergency medicine and the development of educational programs and materials for ED patients and staff.

摘要

背景

对于因急性过敏反应前往急诊科(ED)就诊的患者特征,人们了解相对较少。尽管过敏反应指南建议使用肾上腺素治疗、教授自我注射肾上腺素以及转诊至过敏症专科医生,但目前急诊科的管理仍不明确。

目的

本研究的目的是描述与食物相关的急性过敏反应的管理情况。

方法

多中心气道研究协作组在北美21家急诊科进行了一项病历回顾研究。研究人员随机抽取了678例患有食物过敏(国际疾病分类第九版编码693.1、995.0、995.3以及995.60 - 995.69)患者的病历进行回顾。

结果

患者的平均年龄为29岁;该队列中女性占57%,白人占40%。多种食物引发了过敏反应,包括坚果(21%)、甲壳类动物(19%)、水果(12%)和鱼类(10%)。尽管接触这些食物可能危及生命,但只有18%的患者通过救护车前往急诊科。在急诊科,72%的患者接受了抗组胺药治疗,48%接受了全身性皮质类固醇治疗,16%接受了肾上腺素治疗;33%接受了诸如吸入沙丁胺醇等呼吸治疗。在有严重反应的患者(占总数的55%)中,24%接受了肾上腺素治疗。总体而言,97%的患者出院回家。在急诊科出院时,16%的患者被开了自我注射肾上腺素的处方,12%被转诊至过敏症专科医生。

结论

尽管指南提出了急性过敏反应管理的具体方法,但急诊科对食物过敏的依从性似乎较低。这些发现支持过敏和急诊医学专业组织之间开展新的合作,并为急诊科患者和工作人员开发教育项目及材料。

相似文献

1
Multicenter study of emergency department visits for food allergies.食物过敏急诊就诊情况的多中心研究。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004 Feb;113(2):347-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2003.10.053.
2
Multicenter study of emergency department visits for insect sting allergies.昆虫叮咬过敏急诊就诊情况的多中心研究。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005 Sep;116(3):643-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.06.026.
3
Anaphylaxis management in the pediatric emergency department: opportunities for improvement.儿科急诊科的过敏反应管理:改进的机会
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010 Feb;26(2):71-6. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181ce2e1c.
4
Retrospective study of drug-induced anaphylaxis treated in the emergency department or hospital: patient characteristics, management, and 1-year follow-up.回顾性研究在急诊科或医院治疗的药物性过敏反应:患者特征、处理方法和 1 年随访。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2014 Jan-Feb;2(1):46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2013.08.012. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
5
ICD-9-CM coding of emergency department visits for food and insect sting allergy.急诊科因食物和昆虫叮咬过敏就诊的ICD-9-CM编码
Ann Epidemiol. 2006 Sep;16(9):696-700. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2005.12.003. Epub 2006 Mar 3.
6
Changes in Emergency Department Concordance with Guidelines for the Management of Food-Induced Anaphylaxis: 1999-2001 versus 2013-2015.急诊室与食物诱导性过敏管理指南的一致性变化:1999-2001 年与 2013-2015 年。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Sep-Oct;7(7):2262-2269. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.04.004. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
7
Repeat epinephrine treatments for food-related allergic reactions that present to the emergency department.对因食物过敏而到急诊科就诊的患者,应重复使用肾上腺素治疗。
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2010 Jul-Aug;31(4):308-16. doi: 10.2500/aap.2010.31.3375.
8
Management of acute food allergic reactions by general practitioners.全科医生对急性食物过敏反应的管理。
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Apr;45(2):43-51.
9
National study of US emergency department visits for acute allergic reactions, 1993 to 2004.1993年至2004年美国急诊科急性过敏反应就诊情况的全国性研究。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2007 Apr;98(4):360-5. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60883-6.
10
Emergency department anaphylaxis: A review of 142 patients in a single year.急诊科过敏反应:一年中142例患者的回顾
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001 Nov;108(5):861-6. doi: 10.1067/mai.2001.119028.

引用本文的文献

1
A Case Report of Acute Pancreatitis in Food-Induced Anaphylaxis.食物诱导性过敏反应所致急性胰腺炎一例报告
Cureus. 2024 Oct 7;16(10):e71017. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71017. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Anaphylaxis: first clinical presentation, subsequent referral practise, and suspected elicitor-an observational study.过敏反应:首次临床表现、后续转诊实践和可疑诱发因素——一项观察性研究。
Intern Emerg Med. 2024 Oct;19(7):2047-2056. doi: 10.1007/s11739-024-03589-5. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
3
[Prehospital care of anaphylactic reactions by the air rescue and ground-based emergency services Dresden : An analysis of treatment and outcome].
[德累斯顿空中救援和地面急救服务对过敏反应的院前护理:治疗与结果分析]
HNO. 2024 Sep;72(9):611-618. doi: 10.1007/s00106-024-01457-4. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
4
Epinephrine treatment of food-induced and other cause anaphylaxis in United States and Canadian Emergency Departments: a systematic review and meta-analysis.肾上腺素治疗美国和加拿大急诊部门的食物诱导和其他原因的过敏反应:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2023 Jul-Dec;19(9):1171-1181. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2023.2229517. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
5
Level of knowledge among healthcare professionals regarding anaphylaxis.医疗保健专业人员对过敏反应的认知水平。
Asia Pac Allergy. 2022 Oct 27;12(4):e41. doi: 10.5415/apallergy.2022.12.e41. eCollection 2022 Oct.
6
Real World Management of Anaphylaxis Versus the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Guidelines.过敏反应的真实世界管理与英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)指南对比
Cureus. 2022 Sep 19;14(9):e29336. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29336. eCollection 2022 Sep.
7
Diagnosis, Management and Prescription Practices of Adrenaline in Children with Food-Induced Anaphylaxis: Audit in a Specialized Pediatric Allergy Department.食物诱导性过敏反应儿童肾上腺素的诊断、管理及处方实践:在专业儿科过敏科的审计
J Pers Med. 2022 Sep 9;12(9):1477. doi: 10.3390/jpm12091477.
8
Acute Urticaria and Anaphylaxis: Differences and Similarities in Clinical Management.急性荨麻疹与过敏反应:临床管理中的差异与相似之处
Front Allergy. 2022 Apr 15;3:840999. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2022.840999. eCollection 2022.
9
Consensus on DEfinition of Food Allergy SEverity (DEFASE) an integrated mixed methods systematic review.食物过敏严重程度定义共识(DEFASE):一项综合混合方法的系统评价
World Allergy Organ J. 2021 Mar 11;14(3):100503. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100503. eCollection 2021 Mar.
10
Epinephrine Auto-Injectors for Anaphylaxis Treatment in the School Setting: A Discussion Paper.学校环境中用于过敏反应治疗的肾上腺素自动注射器:一篇讨论文件。
SAGE Open Nurs. 2019 May 23;5:2377960819845246. doi: 10.1177/2377960819845246. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.