Atkins Danielle N
Department of Political Science, University of Tennessee, 1001 McClung Tower, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA. E-mail:
J Public Health Policy. 2014 Aug;35(3):292-310. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2014.3. Epub 2014 Feb 27.
In the United States (US), access to emergency contraceptive pills (ECPs) expanded to nationwide in 2006 when regulators allowed Plan B, a brand of emergency contraception, to be sold without prescription. Using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2001 to 2010, I examined any association between increased access to these ECPs in the US and negative consequences. I found an association between increased access to ECPs and a 2.2 per cent higher probability of any sexual activity, a 5.2 per cent increase in the likelihood of reporting sex with multiple partners, an increase in the average number of partners by 0.35, and a -7.6 per cent decrease in the likelihood of injectable contraceptive use. These results suggest that policies in the US and other countries that expand access to ECPs should be paired with information on ECPs' lack of protection against sexually transmitted infections and relatively lower efficacy compared to other forms of contraception.
在美国,2006年紧急避孕药的获取范围扩大至全国,当时监管机构允许非处方销售紧急避孕药品牌“Plan B”。利用2001年至2010年美国国家健康与营养检查调查的数据,我研究了美国获取这些紧急避孕药的机会增加与负面后果之间的任何关联。我发现,获取紧急避孕药的机会增加与任何性行为的概率提高2.2%、报告与多个性伴侣发生性行为的可能性增加5.2%、性伴侣平均数量增加0.35以及注射用避孕药使用可能性降低7.6%之间存在关联。这些结果表明,美国和其他国家扩大紧急避孕药获取范围的政策应与关于紧急避孕药缺乏预防性传播感染的保护作用以及与其他避孕方式相比相对较低的有效性的信息相结合。