Stein Alexander, Bokemeyer Carsten
Alexander Stein, Carsten Bokemeyer, Department of Oncology, Haematology, Stem Cell Transplantation with the Section Pneumology, Hubertus Wald Tumor Centre University Cancer Centre Hamburg, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jan 28;20(4):899-907. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i4.899.
Choice of first line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is based on tumour and patient related factors and molecular information for determination of individual treatment aim and thus treatment intensity. Recent advances (e.g., extended RAS testing) enable tailored patient assignment to the most beneficial treatment approach. Besides fluoropyrimidines, irinotecan and oxaliplatin, a broad variety of molecular targeting agents are currently available, e.g., anti-angiogenic agents (bevacizumab) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies (cetuximab, panitumumab) for first line treatment of mCRC. Although some combinations should be avoided (e.g., oral or bolus fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin and EGFR antibodies), treatment options range from single agent to highly effective four-drug regimen. Preliminary data comparing EGFR antibodies and bevacizumab, both with chemotherapy, seem to favour EGFR antibodies in RAS wildtype disease. However, choosing the most appropriate treatment approach for mCRC patients remains a complex issue, with numerous open questions.
转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者一线治疗方案的选择基于肿瘤和患者相关因素以及分子信息,以确定个体化治疗目标,进而确定治疗强度。近期的进展(如扩展RAS检测)使患者能够根据自身情况选择最有益的治疗方法。除氟尿嘧啶、伊立替康和奥沙利铂外,目前还有多种分子靶向药物可供使用,例如抗血管生成药物(贝伐单抗)和表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)抗体(西妥昔单抗、帕尼单抗),用于mCRC的一线治疗。尽管有些联合治疗方案应避免(如口服或推注氟尿嘧啶、奥沙利铂和EGFR抗体),但治疗选择范围从单药治疗到高效的四联方案。比较EGFR抗体和贝伐单抗联合化疗的初步数据似乎表明,在RAS野生型疾病中,EGFR抗体更具优势。然而,为mCRC患者选择最合适的治疗方法仍然是一个复杂的问题,还有许多未解决的问题。