Suppr超能文献

中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值对不同治疗方式转移性结直肠癌患者预后的预测价值。

Prognostic utility of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated using different modalities.

机构信息

Centro Hospitalar Barreiro-Montijo, Barreiro, Portugal.

出版信息

Curr Oncol. 2020 Oct;27(5):237-243. doi: 10.3747/co.27.6573. Epub 2020 Oct 1.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Inflammation is a critical component in carcinogenesis. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (nlr) has been retrospectively studied as a biomarker of prognosis in metastatic colorectal cancer (mcrc). Compared with a low nlr, a high nlr is associated with worse prognosis. In the present study, we compared real-world survival for patients with mcrc based on their nlr group, and we assessed the utility of the nlr in determining first-line chemotherapy and metastasectomy benefit.

METHODS

In this retrospective and descriptive analysis of patients with mcrc undergoing first-line chemotherapy in a single centre, the last systemic absolute neutrophil and lymphocyte count before treatment was used for the nlr. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to estimate the nlr cut-off value, dividing the patients into low and high nlr groups. Median overall survival (mos) was compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test. A multivariate analysis was performed using a Cox regression model.

RESULTS

The 102 analyzed patients had a median follow-up of 15 months. Regardless of systemic therapy, approximately 20% of patients underwent metastasectomy. The nlr cut-off was established at 2.35, placing 45 patients in the low-risk group (nlr < 2.35) and 57 in the high-risk group (nlr ≥ 2.35). The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a mos of 39.1 months in the low-risk group and 14.4 months in the high-risk group ( < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression on the nlr estimated a hazard ratio of 3.08 ( = 0.01). Survival analysis in each risk subgroup, considering the history of metastasectomy, was also performed. In the low-risk group, mos was longer for patients undergoing metastasectomy than for those not undergoing the procedure (95.2 months vs. 22.6 months, = 0.05). In the high-risk group, mos was not statistically different for patients undergoing or not undergoing metastasectomy (24.3 months vs. 12.7 months, = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Our real-world data analysis of nlr in patients with mcrc confirmed that this biomarker is useful in predicting survival. It also suggests that nlr is an effective tool to choose first-line treatment and to predict the benefit of metastasectomy.

摘要

简介

炎症是致癌过程中的一个关键组成部分。中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)已被回顾性研究作为转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)预后的生物标志物。与低 NLR 相比,高 NLR 与预后更差相关。在本研究中,我们根据 NLR 组比较了 mCRC 患者的真实世界生存情况,并评估了 NLR 确定一线化疗和转移瘤切除术获益的效用。

方法

在对单一中心接受一线化疗的 mCRC 患者进行回顾性和描述性分析中,使用治疗前最后一次系统绝对中性粒细胞和淋巴细胞计数来计算 NLR。使用受试者工作特征曲线来估计 NLR 截断值,将患者分为低 NLR 组和高 NLR 组。使用 Kaplan-Meier 曲线和对数秩检验比较中位总生存期(mOS)。使用 Cox 回归模型进行多变量分析。

结果

分析的 102 例患者中位随访时间为 15 个月。无论采用何种系统治疗,约 20%的患者接受了转移瘤切除术。 NLR 截断值设定为 2.35,将 45 例患者置于低危组(NLR<2.35),57 例患者置于高危组(NLR≥2.35)。Kaplan-Meier 分析显示低危组 mOS 为 39.1 个月,高危组为 14.4 个月(<0.001)。多变量 Cox 回归分析估计 NLR 的风险比为 3.08(=0.01)。还对考虑转移瘤切除术史的每个风险亚组进行了生存分析。在低危组中,接受转移瘤切除术的患者 mOS 长于未接受该手术的患者(95.2 个月 vs. 22.6 个月,=0.05)。在高危组中,接受或未接受转移瘤切除术的患者 mOS 无统计学差异(24.3 个月 vs. 12.7 个月,=0.08)。

结论

我们对 mCRC 患者 NLR 的真实世界数据分析证实,该生物标志物可有效预测生存。它还表明 NLR 是选择一线治疗和预测转移瘤切除术获益的有效工具。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Quantitative evidence for early metastatic seeding in colorectal cancer.结直肠癌早期转移播种的定量证据。
Nat Genet. 2019 Jul;51(7):1113-1122. doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0423-x. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
9
Immunological Approaches Towards Cancer and Inflammation: A Cross Talk.免疫治疗在癌症和炎症中的交叉对话
Front Immunol. 2018 Mar 20;9:563. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00563. eCollection 2018.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验