Centro Hospitalar Barreiro-Montijo, Barreiro, Portugal.
Curr Oncol. 2020 Oct;27(5):237-243. doi: 10.3747/co.27.6573. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
Inflammation is a critical component in carcinogenesis. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (nlr) has been retrospectively studied as a biomarker of prognosis in metastatic colorectal cancer (mcrc). Compared with a low nlr, a high nlr is associated with worse prognosis. In the present study, we compared real-world survival for patients with mcrc based on their nlr group, and we assessed the utility of the nlr in determining first-line chemotherapy and metastasectomy benefit.
In this retrospective and descriptive analysis of patients with mcrc undergoing first-line chemotherapy in a single centre, the last systemic absolute neutrophil and lymphocyte count before treatment was used for the nlr. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to estimate the nlr cut-off value, dividing the patients into low and high nlr groups. Median overall survival (mos) was compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test. A multivariate analysis was performed using a Cox regression model.
The 102 analyzed patients had a median follow-up of 15 months. Regardless of systemic therapy, approximately 20% of patients underwent metastasectomy. The nlr cut-off was established at 2.35, placing 45 patients in the low-risk group (nlr < 2.35) and 57 in the high-risk group (nlr ≥ 2.35). The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a mos of 39.1 months in the low-risk group and 14.4 months in the high-risk group ( < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression on the nlr estimated a hazard ratio of 3.08 ( = 0.01). Survival analysis in each risk subgroup, considering the history of metastasectomy, was also performed. In the low-risk group, mos was longer for patients undergoing metastasectomy than for those not undergoing the procedure (95.2 months vs. 22.6 months, = 0.05). In the high-risk group, mos was not statistically different for patients undergoing or not undergoing metastasectomy (24.3 months vs. 12.7 months, = 0.08).
Our real-world data analysis of nlr in patients with mcrc confirmed that this biomarker is useful in predicting survival. It also suggests that nlr is an effective tool to choose first-line treatment and to predict the benefit of metastasectomy.
炎症是致癌过程中的一个关键组成部分。中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)已被回顾性研究作为转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)预后的生物标志物。与低 NLR 相比,高 NLR 与预后更差相关。在本研究中,我们根据 NLR 组比较了 mCRC 患者的真实世界生存情况,并评估了 NLR 确定一线化疗和转移瘤切除术获益的效用。
在对单一中心接受一线化疗的 mCRC 患者进行回顾性和描述性分析中,使用治疗前最后一次系统绝对中性粒细胞和淋巴细胞计数来计算 NLR。使用受试者工作特征曲线来估计 NLR 截断值,将患者分为低 NLR 组和高 NLR 组。使用 Kaplan-Meier 曲线和对数秩检验比较中位总生存期(mOS)。使用 Cox 回归模型进行多变量分析。
分析的 102 例患者中位随访时间为 15 个月。无论采用何种系统治疗,约 20%的患者接受了转移瘤切除术。 NLR 截断值设定为 2.35,将 45 例患者置于低危组(NLR<2.35),57 例患者置于高危组(NLR≥2.35)。Kaplan-Meier 分析显示低危组 mOS 为 39.1 个月,高危组为 14.4 个月(<0.001)。多变量 Cox 回归分析估计 NLR 的风险比为 3.08(=0.01)。还对考虑转移瘤切除术史的每个风险亚组进行了生存分析。在低危组中,接受转移瘤切除术的患者 mOS 长于未接受该手术的患者(95.2 个月 vs. 22.6 个月,=0.05)。在高危组中,接受或未接受转移瘤切除术的患者 mOS 无统计学差异(24.3 个月 vs. 12.7 个月,=0.08)。
我们对 mCRC 患者 NLR 的真实世界数据分析证实,该生物标志物可有效预测生存。它还表明 NLR 是选择一线治疗和预测转移瘤切除术获益的有效工具。