Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, 38000 Grenoble, France.
INSERM, Clinical Research Centre 1406, 38000 Grenoble, France; Grenoble Alpes University, Clinical Research Centre 1406, 38000 Grenoble, France.
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2019 Oct;38(5):477-483. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2019.06.012. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
Although non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is recommended in patients with chest trauma, this procedure may expose to discomfort and even failure due to agitation or excessive pain. We tested the impact of dexmedetomidine on the duration of the first session of NIV.
This randomised, crossover study enrolled 19 patients with blunt chest trauma who needed NIV. During one cycle comprising two NIV sessions, patients received in a random order an intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine (0.7mcg/kg/h) and placebo (saline solution) that was initiated 60min prior to NIV. Dexmedetomidine (or placebo) was titrated to maintain a Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) score between 0 and -3. A 6-h washout period was observed between NIV sessions. The reproducibility of the drug-related effects was tested during a second cycle of two NIV sessions.
During the first cycle, dexmedetomidine prolonged the duration of NIV compared to placebo: 280min (118-450) (median, 25-75th quartiles) versus 120min (68-287) respectively, corresponding to a median increased duration of 96min (12-180) (P=0.03). Dexmedetomidine was associated with a lower score for RASS: -0.8 (-1.0;0.0) versus 0.0 (-0.5;0.0) (P<0.01), and reduced respiratory discomfort according to the 10cm visual similar scale: 0.6cm (0.0-3.0) versus 2.2cm (0.0-5.3) (P=0.05). Pain scores, morphine consumption, and blood gas measurements were comparable between groups. No difference in the duration of non-invasive ventilation was found during the second cycle.
In this pilot trial, dexmedetomidine could facilitate the acceptance of the first session of non-invasive ventilation for patients with chest trauma.
虽然推荐对胸部创伤患者使用无创通气(NIV),但由于躁动或过度疼痛,该程序可能会导致不适甚至失败。我们测试了右美托咪定对 NIV 第一次治疗持续时间的影响。
这项随机、交叉研究纳入了 19 例需要 NIV 的钝性胸部创伤患者。在包含两次 NIV 治疗的一个周期中,患者按顺序随机接受静脉输注右美托咪定(0.7mcg/kg/h)和安慰剂(生理盐水),在开始 NIV 前 60 分钟开始输注。右美托咪定(或安慰剂)滴定至维持 Richmond 躁动镇静量表(RASS)评分为 0 至-3。两次 NIV 治疗之间观察 6 小时的洗脱期。在第二个包含两次 NIV 治疗的周期中测试了药物相关作用的重现性。
在第一个周期中,与安慰剂相比,右美托咪定延长了 NIV 的持续时间:分别为 280min(118-450)(中位数,25-75 百分位)和 120min(68-287),对应中位数延长 96min(12-180)(P=0.03)。右美托咪定与 RASS 评分较低相关:-0.8(-1.0;0.0)与 0.0(-0.5;0.0)(P<0.01),根据 10cm 视觉相似量表,呼吸不适减轻:0.6cm(0.0-3.0)与 2.2cm(0.0-5.3)(P=0.05)。两组之间的疼痛评分、吗啡消耗量和血气测量值无差异。在第二个周期中,NIV 的持续时间没有差异。
在这项初步试验中,右美托咪定可能有助于接受胸部创伤患者的第一次 NIV 治疗。