Suppr超能文献

单一和多菌株益生菌对尿路病原体生物膜形成和体外膀胱细胞黏附的影响。

Effects of single- and multi-strain probiotics on biofilm formation and in vitro adhesion to bladder cells by urinary tract pathogens.

机构信息

Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Reading, P.O. Box 226, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6AP, United Kingdom.

Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Reading, P.O. Box 226, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6AP, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Anaerobe. 2014 Jun;27:71-6. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2014.02.001. Epub 2014 Feb 25.

Abstract

PURPOSE

There is increasing evidence that probiotic bacteria can inhibit and/or prevent urinary tract infections. Possible mechanisms include prevention of adhesion of pathogens to the bladder epithelium and inhibition of biofilm formation. Currently there is interest in the comparative efficacy of single probiotics vs. strain mixtures. We have therefore tested the inhibitory activity of four single probiotics and four probiotic mixtures towards the urinary tract pathogens Escherichia coli NCTC 9001 and Enterococcus faecalis NCTC 00775.

METHODS

Inhibition of biofilm formation by cell-free supernatants was tested using the Crystal Violet assay, while prevention of pathogen adhesion to host cells was tested by using bladder cancer cells as a model for the human urinary tract.

RESULTS

Under pH-controlled conditions, there was no significant inhibition of biofilm formation by any treatment. Without pH control, 5/8 treatments significantly inhibited biofilm production by E. coli, while 5/8 treatments inhibited production by E. faecalis. Using data from all Crystal Violet assays, there was no significant difference in the ability of single- and multi-strain probiotics to inhibit biofilm formation. In the cell culture assays, all treatments were able to significantly reduce numbers of pathogenic cells adhering to host cells by 2.5-3.5 logs. No significant difference was observed between the displacement caused by single strains and mixtures for either pathogen.

CONCLUSIONS

Inhibition of biofilm seems to be a major mechanism of urinary tract pathogen exclusion, related to, and possibly dependent upon, the probiotic ability to reduce environmental pH. Exclusion via competition of binding sites is a possible in vivo mechanism for these probiotics. If an additive or synergistic effect exists between strains within a mixture, it does not manifest itself in a greater effect through these two inhibitory mechanisms.

摘要

目的

越来越多的证据表明益生菌可抑制和/或预防尿路感染。可能的机制包括阻止病原体黏附于膀胱上皮和抑制生物膜形成。目前,人们对单一益生菌与混合菌株的相对疗效感兴趣。因此,我们测试了四种单一益生菌和四种益生菌混合物对尿路感染病原体大肠杆菌 NCTC 9001 和粪肠球菌 NCTC 00775 的抑制活性。

方法

使用结晶紫测定法测试无细胞上清液对生物膜形成的抑制作用,同时使用膀胱癌细胞作为人类泌尿道模型来测试病原体黏附宿主细胞的预防作用。

结果

在 pH 控制条件下,任何处理均未显著抑制生物膜形成。不进行 pH 控制时,有 5/8 的处理显著抑制大肠杆菌生物膜的产生,而有 5/8 的处理抑制粪肠球菌生物膜的产生。使用所有结晶紫测定的数据,单一和多菌株益生菌抑制生物膜形成的能力没有显著差异。在细胞培养测定中,所有处理均能使黏附于宿主细胞的致病性细胞数量显著减少 2.5-3.5 个对数级。对于任一病原体,单菌株和混合物引起的置换均无显著差异。

结论

生物膜抑制似乎是一种主要的泌尿道病原体排除机制,与益生菌降低环境 pH 值的能力有关,可能依赖于这种能力。通过竞争结合位点来排除是这些益生菌在体内的一种可能机制。如果混合物内的菌株之间存在相加或协同作用,则通过这两种抑制机制不会表现出更大的效果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验