Department of Anthropology, Center for the Study of Human Origins, New York University, New York, NY, United States; New York Consortium in Evolutionary Primatology, United States; Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Unit, German Primate Center, Göttingen, Germany.
Department of Anthropology, Center for the Study of Human Origins, New York University, New York, NY, United States; New York Consortium in Evolutionary Primatology, United States; Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2014 Jun;75:165-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.02.023. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
The origins and the divergence times of the most basal lineages within primates have been difficult to resolve mainly due to the incomplete sampling of early fossil taxa. The main source of contention is related to the discordance between molecular and fossil estimates: while there are no crown primate fossils older than 56Ma, most molecule-based estimates extend the origins of crown primates into the Cretaceous. Here we present a comprehensive mitogenomic study of primates. We assembled 87 mammalian mitochondrial genomes, including 62 primate species representing all the families of the order. We newly sequenced eleven mitochondrial genomes, including eight Old World monkeys and three strepsirrhines. Phylogenetic analyses support a strong topology, confirming the monophyly for all the major primate clades. In contrast to previous mitogenomic studies, the positions of tarsiers and colugos relative to strepsirrhines and anthropoids are well resolved. In order to improve our understanding of how fossil calibrations affect age estimates within primates, we explore the effect of seventeen fossil calibrations across primates and other mammalian groups and we select a subset of calibrations to date our mitogenomic tree. The divergence date estimates of the Strepsirrhine/Haplorhine split support an origin of crown primates in the Late Cretaceous, at around 74Ma. This result supports a short-fuse model of primate origins, whereby relatively little time passed between the origin of the order and the diversification of its major clades. It also suggests that the early primate fossil record is likely poorly sampled.
灵长类动物中最基础的谱系的起源和分化时间一直难以确定,主要是由于早期化石类群的采样不完全。争议的主要来源与分子和化石估计之间的不一致有关:虽然没有比 56Ma 更古老的冠层灵长类动物化石,但大多数基于分子的估计将冠层灵长类动物的起源扩展到了白垩纪。在这里,我们对灵长类动物进行了全面的线粒体基因组研究。我们组装了 87 种哺乳动物的线粒体基因组,其中包括代表目所有科的 62 种灵长类动物。我们新测序了 11 种线粒体基因组,包括 8 种旧世界猴和 3 种贫齿目动物。系统发育分析支持一个强有力的拓扑结构,证实了所有主要灵长类动物类群的单系性。与以前的线粒体基因组研究相比,狐猴和眼镜猴相对于贫齿目和类人猿的位置得到了很好的解决。为了更好地了解化石校准如何影响灵长类动物内部的年龄估计,我们探讨了在灵长类动物和其他哺乳动物群体中使用十七个化石校准的效果,并选择了一组校准来确定我们的线粒体基因组树的日期。灵长类动物中 Strepsirrhine/Haplorhine 分裂的分歧日期估计支持冠层灵长类动物起源于白垩纪晚期,约 74Ma。这一结果支持灵长类动物起源的短燃模型,即在该目起源和其主要类群多样化之间,时间间隔相对较短。这也表明早期灵长类动物的化石记录可能采样不足。