Fried Eiko I, Nesse Randolph M
Cluster of Excellence "Languages of Emotion", Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany ; Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 28;9(2):e90311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090311. eCollection 2014.
Previous studies have established that scores on Major Depressive Disorder scales are correlated with measures of impairment of psychosocial functioning. It remains unclear, however, whether individual depressive symptoms vary in their effect on impairment, and if so, what the magnitude of these differences might be. We analyzed data from 3,703 depressed outpatients in the first treatment stage of the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) study. Participants reported on the severity of 14 depressive symptoms, and stated to what degree their depression impaired psychosocial functioning (in general, and in the five domains work, home management, social activities, private activities, and close relationships). We tested whether symptoms differed in their associations with impairment, estimated unique shared variances of each symptom with impairment to assess the degree of difference, and examined whether symptoms had variable impacts across impairment domains. Our results show that symptoms varied substantially in their associations with impairment, and contributed to the total explained variance in a range from 0.7% (hypersomnia) to 20.9% (sad mood). Furthermore, symptoms had significantly different impacts on the five impairment domains. Overall, sad mood and concentration problems had the highest unique associations with impairment and were among the most debilitating symptoms in all five domains. Our findings are in line with a growing chorus of voices suggesting that symptom sum-scores obfuscate relevant differences between depressed patients and that substantial rewards will come from close attention to individual depression symptoms.
以往的研究已经证实,重度抑郁症量表的得分与心理社会功能损害的测量指标相关。然而,尚不清楚个体抑郁症状对损害的影响是否存在差异,如果存在差异,这些差异的程度可能是多少。我们分析了缓解抑郁症的序贯治疗方案(STAR*D)研究第一治疗阶段3703名门诊抑郁症患者的数据。参与者报告了14种抑郁症状的严重程度,并说明了他们的抑郁在多大程度上损害了心理社会功能(总体而言,以及在工作、家庭管理、社交活动、私人活动和亲密关系这五个领域)。我们测试了症状与损害之间的关联是否存在差异,估计了每种症状与损害的独特共享方差以评估差异程度,并检查了症状在不同损害领域的影响是否可变。我们的结果表明症状与损害之间的关联存在很大差异,对总解释方差的贡献范围从0.7%(嗜睡)到20.9%(悲伤情绪)。此外,症状对五个损害领域的影响存在显著差异。总体而言,悲伤情绪和注意力问题与损害的独特关联最高,并且是所有五个领域中最使人衰弱的症状之一。我们的研究结果与越来越多的观点一致,这些观点表明症状总分掩盖了抑郁症患者之间的相关差异,密切关注个体抑郁症状将带来巨大回报。