• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

质量测量的历史与背景

History and background of quality measurement.

作者信息

Chun Jonathan, Bafford Andrea Chao

机构信息

Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Division of General and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2014 Mar;27(1):5-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1366912.

DOI:10.1055/s-0034-1366912
PMID:24587698
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3926916/
Abstract

Health care quality measurement has become increasingly emphasized, as providers and administrators respond to public and government demands for improved patient care. This article will review the evolution of surgical quality measurement and improvement from its infancy in the 1850s to the vast efforts being undertaken today.

摘要

随着医疗服务提供者和管理人员回应公众及政府对改善患者护理的要求,医疗质量测量越来越受到重视。本文将回顾手术质量测量与改进从19世纪50年代的起步阶段到如今所付出的巨大努力的发展历程。

相似文献

1
History and background of quality measurement.质量测量的历史与背景
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2014 Mar;27(1):5-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1366912.
2
Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.实施和使用儿童保健质量指标:实践现状透视
Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 2):217-27.
3
Reducing the quality risk of elderly care services in government procurement from market-oriented private providers through ex ante policy design: lessons from the principal-agent theory analysis.通过事前政策设计降低市场化私人养老服务供应商的质量风险:来自委托代理理论分析的经验教训。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Dec 10;20(1):1135. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05994-w.
4
Association Between Hospital Safety Culture and Surgical Outcomes in a Statewide Surgical Quality Improvement Collaborative.全州外科质量改进合作项目中医院安全文化与外科手术结果的关系。
J Am Coll Surg. 2019 Aug;229(2):175-183. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.02.046. Epub 2019 Mar 9.
5
State health agencies and quality improvement in perinatal care.州卫生机构与围产期保健质量改进
Pediatrics. 1999 Jan;103(1 Suppl E):233-47.
6
The ORYX initiative: goals and potential application to physician quality improvement efforts.ORYX计划:目标及其在提高医生质量方面的潜在应用
Tex Med. 2000 Oct;96(10):84-7.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
How can quality improvement enhance the lives of children with disabilities?质量改进如何能改善残疾儿童的生活?
Future Child. 2012 Spring;22(1):149-68. doi: 10.1353/foc.2012.0005.
9
Balancing accountability and improvement: a case study from Massachusetts.平衡问责与改进:来自马萨诸塞州的案例研究
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2000 May;26(5):299-312. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(00)26024-0.
10
The Impact of Applying Quality Management Practices on Patient Centeredness in Jordanian Public Hospitals: Results of Predictive Modeling.质量管理实践对约旦公立医院以患者为中心的影响:预测模型结果
Inquiry. 2018 Jan-Dec;55:46958018754739. doi: 10.1177/0046958018754739.

引用本文的文献

1
History and Role of Quality Accreditation.质量认证的历史与作用
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2023 Mar 13;36(4):279-284. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1761592. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
Measuring Quality at the Surgeon Level.衡量外科医生层面的质量。
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2023 Mar 24;36(4):233-239. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1761421. eCollection 2023 Jul.
3
Public reporting and transparency: a primer on public outcomes reporting.公开报告和透明度:公共结果报告入门。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jul;33(7):2043-2049. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06756-4. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
4
Quality improvement in healthcare for patients with inflammatory bowel disease.炎症性肠病患者医疗保健的质量改进。
Transl Pediatr. 2019 Jan;8(1):77-82. doi: 10.21037/tp.2019.01.02.
5
Trauma center maturity measured by an analysis of preventable and potentially preventable deaths: there is always something to be learned….通过对可预防和潜在可预防死亡情况的分析来衡量创伤中心的成熟度:总有东西值得学习……
Surg Today. 2018 Nov;48(11):1004-1010. doi: 10.1007/s00595-018-1687-y. Epub 2018 Jun 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the Tennessee Surgical Quality Collaborative to improve surgical outcomes.利用国家手术质量改进计划和田纳西州手术质量合作组织来改善手术结果。
J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Apr;214(4):709-14; discussion 714-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.12.012. Epub 2012 Jan 21.
2
Creating a learning healthcare system in surgery: Washington State's Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program (SCOAP) at 5 years.创建外科手术中的学习型医疗保健系统:华盛顿州外科手术护理和结果评估计划(SCOAP)五年回顾。
Surgery. 2012 Feb;151(2):146-52. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.08.015. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
3
Association of surgical care improvement project infection-related process measure compliance with risk-adjusted outcomes: implications for quality measurement.外科手术护理改进项目感染相关过程指标符合风险调整结果的关联性:对质量测量的启示。
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Dec;211(6):705-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.09.006.
4
An increase in compliance with the Surgical Care Improvement Project measures does not prevent surgical site infection in colorectal surgery.提高对手术护理改进项目措施的依从性并不能预防结直肠手术中的手术部位感染。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 Jan;53(1):24-30. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181ba782a.
5
Does surgical quality improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: an evaluation of all participating hospitals.美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划中的手术质量是否有所提高:对所有参与医院的评估。
Ann Surg. 2009 Sep;250(3):363-76. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b4148f.
6
Comparison of risk adjustment methodologies in surgical quality improvement.手术质量改进中风险调整方法的比较
Surgery. 2008 Oct;144(4):662-7; discussion 662-7. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2008.06.010.
7
The patient safety in surgery study: background, study design, and patient populations.外科手术中的患者安全研究:背景、研究设计及患者群体
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jun;204(6):1089-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.028.
8
Florence Nightingale and healthcare reform.弗洛伦斯·南丁格尔与医疗改革。
Nurs Sci Q. 2006 Jan;19(1):61-4. doi: 10.1177/0894318405283556.
9
Washington State's approach to variability in surgical processes/Outcomes: Surgical Clinical Outcomes Assessment Program (SCOAP).华盛顿州应对手术流程/结果变异性的方法:手术临床结果评估项目(SCOAP)。
Surgery. 2005 Nov;138(5):821-8. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.07.026.
10
Evaluating the quality of medical care. 1966.评估医疗质量。1966年。
Milbank Q. 2005;83(4):691-729. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00397.x.