Suppr超能文献

伊马替尼治疗失败后再次使用伊马替尼和舒尼替尼治疗晚期胃肠道间质瘤患者的影响。

Impact of rechallenge with imatinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor after failure of imatinib and sunitinib.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya-shi, Aichi 464-8681, Japan.

Digestive and General Surgery 2 Division, Niigata University Hospital, 754 Ichibancho, Asahimachidori, Chuo-ku, Niigata-shi, Niigata 951-8510, Japan.

出版信息

Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2014;2014:342986. doi: 10.1155/2014/342986. Epub 2014 Jan 22.

Abstract

Purpose. This retrospective, nonrandomized study investigated the effect of imatinib rechallenge plus best supportive care (BSC) on overall survival after imatinib and sunitinib treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Methods. Twenty-six patients who had previously been exposed to both imatinib and sunitinib were enrolled in this study. The treatment regimen was BSC with or without imatinib, based on the patient's choice after discussion with his or her physician. The primary endpoint was overall survival, and secondary endpoints were time to treatment failure, clinical response rate assessed by Choi criteria, and safety. Results. Fourteen patients were treated with imatinib plus BSC and 12 received BSC alone. Median overall survival was greatly improved for the imatinib group, although differences were not significant (22 months for imatinib plus BSC versus 4 months for BSC; P = 0.058). Three patients (21%) had a clinical response in the imatinib group, and one had a clinical response in the BSC alone group. Imatinib was well tolerated. Conclusions. Rechallenge with imatinib may be associated with improvement in overall survival without deteriorating performance status in patients who failed imatinib and sunitinib. A prospective study should be considered to confirm the efficacy of rechallenge with imatinib.

摘要

目的。本回顾性、非随机研究旨在探讨伊马替尼再挑战联合最佳支持治疗(BSC)对先前接受伊马替尼和舒尼替尼治疗的局部晚期或转移性胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)患者总生存期的影响。

方法。本研究纳入了 26 例先前接受过伊马替尼和舒尼替尼治疗的患者。根据患者与医生讨论后的选择,治疗方案为 BSC 联合或不联合伊马替尼。主要终点为总生存期,次要终点为无进展生存期、Choi 标准评估的临床缓解率和安全性。

结果。14 例患者接受伊马替尼联合 BSC 治疗,12 例患者仅接受 BSC 治疗。尽管差异无统计学意义(伊马替尼联合 BSC 组为 22 个月,BSC 组为 4 个月;P = 0.058),但伊马替尼联合 BSC 组的中位总生存期明显改善。伊马替尼组有 3 例(21%)患者出现临床缓解,BSC 组有 1 例患者出现临床缓解。伊马替尼耐受性良好。

结论。对于伊马替尼和舒尼替尼治疗失败的患者,伊马替尼再挑战可能与总生存期的改善相关,而不会导致体能状态恶化。应考虑开展前瞻性研究以确认伊马替尼再挑战的疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d113/3920623/25a2f21b1424/GRP2014-342986.001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验