Blichmann C W, Serup J
Department of Dermatology, Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Acta Derm Venereol. 1988;68(4):284-90.
Experiments on skin moisture, i.e. the hydration state of the outer epidermis, were undertaken using three different types of equipment, i.e. the Skicon-100 and Corneometer CM 420 hydrometers and the Servo Med EPI evaporimeter. The studies included 10 healthy volunteers. Water was applied to test sites on the forearm and the palm of the hand, and effects monitored by the three methods. Parallel increases in conductance, capacitance and transepidermal water loss were registered for a duration of about 5 min. The Skicon-100 was more sensitive for measurement of increased hydration, while the Corneometer CM 420 might be more sensitive for measurement of decreased hydration. Inter- and intra-individual variations were minor with all instruments. According to reproducibility studies, the Corneometer CM 420 was more accurate than the Skicon-100. Technical experiments indicated that the Corneometer CM 420 depicts changes of hydration down to a depth of 0.1 mm, while the Skicon-100 measures very superficially. In conclusion, both hydrometers were deemed relevant and valid for assessment of skin moisture. The methods are complementary, and their combined use is recommended.
针对皮肤水分,即表皮外层的水合状态,使用三种不同类型的设备进行了实验,即Skicon - 100型和角质层水合度测定仪CM 420以及Servo Med EPI蒸发仪。研究纳入了10名健康志愿者。将水涂抹在前臂和手掌的测试部位,并用这三种方法监测效果。在约5分钟的时间段内,记录到电导率、电容和经表皮水分流失呈平行增加。Skicon - 100型对于测量水合增加更为敏感,而角质层水合度测定仪CM 420对于测量水合减少可能更为敏感。所有仪器的个体间和个体内差异都较小。根据重现性研究,角质层水合度测定仪CM 420比Skicon - 100型更准确。技术实验表明,角质层水合度测定仪CM 420能够描绘至0.1毫米深度的水合变化,而Skicon - 100型测量的是非常浅表的情况。总之,两种水分测定仪都被认为对于评估皮肤水分是相关且有效的。这两种方法互为补充,建议联合使用。