• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Benchmarking network for clinical and humanistic outcomes in diabetes (BENCH-D) study: protocol, tools, and population.糖尿病临床与人文结局基准网络(BENCH-D)研究:方案、工具与人群
Springerplus. 2014 Feb 12;3:83. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-83. eCollection 2014.
2
Correlates of diabetes-related distress in type 2 diabetes: Findings from the benchmarking network for clinical and humanistic outcomes in diabetes (BENCH-D) study.2 型糖尿病患者糖尿病相关困扰的相关因素:来自糖尿病临床和人文结局基准网络研究(BENCH-D 研究)的结果。
J Psychosom Res. 2015 Nov;79(5):348-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.08.010. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
3
The complex interplay between clinical and person-centered diabetes outcomes in the two genders.两种性别中临床糖尿病结局与以患者为中心的糖尿病结局之间的复杂相互作用。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Feb 21;15(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0613-0.
4
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs second study (DAWN2™): cross-national benchmarking of diabetes-related psychosocial outcomes for people with diabetes.糖尿病态度、愿望和需求研究 2 期(DAWN2™):对不同国家糖尿病患者的糖尿病相关心理社会结局进行跨国家基准测试。
Diabet Med. 2013 Jul;30(7):767-77. doi: 10.1111/dme.12245.
7
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Interplay among patient empowerment and clinical and person-centered outcomes in type 2 diabetes. The BENCH-D study.2型糖尿病患者赋权与以临床和患者为中心的结局之间的相互作用。BENCH-D研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Sep;98(9):1142-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.05.012. Epub 2015 May 21.
10
Health services research related to performance indicators and benchmarking in Europe.欧洲与绩效指标和基准相关的卫生服务研究。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2011 Jul;16 Suppl 2:38-47. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2011.011042.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-World Effectiveness of Different Nutraceutical Formulations on Pain Intensity of Subjects with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: An Observational, Retrospective, Case-Control Study.不同营养补充剂配方对糖尿病周围神经病变患者疼痛强度的真实世界疗效:一项观察性、回顾性、病例对照研究
Biomedicines. 2025 Jun 8;13(6):1407. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13061407.
2
The importance of rapid assessment tools in evaluating mental health in emergency departments among patients with chronic diseases.在评估慢性病患者在急诊科的心理健康时,快速评估工具的重要性。
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 1;12:1258749. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1258749. eCollection 2024.
3
The prevalence of diabetes distress among patients with type 2 diabetes in Jordan.约旦2型糖尿病患者中糖尿病困扰的患病率。
J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2023 Apr 15;18(6):1237-1243. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2023.04.002. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Validation of the WHO-5 Well-Being Scale among Adolescents in Ghana: Evidence-Based Assessment of the Internal and External Structure of the Measure.加纳青少年中世界卫生组织-5幸福量表的验证:基于证据对该量表内部和外部结构的评估
Children (Basel). 2022 Jul 1;9(7):991. doi: 10.3390/children9070991.
5
The participatory development of a national core set of person-centred diabetes outcome constructs for use in routine diabetes care across healthcare sectors.为跨医疗保健部门的常规糖尿病护理制定一套以患者为中心的糖尿病结局指标的国家核心集的参与式开发。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Sep 10;7(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00309-7.
6
Associations between green/blue spaces and mental health across 18 countries.绿地/蓝地与 18 个国家/地区精神健康的关联。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 26;11(1):8903. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87675-0.
7
Distress and Type 2 Diabetes Self-Care: Putting the Pieces Together.痛苦与 2 型糖尿病自我护理:将各部分联系起来。
Ann Behav Med. 2021 Oct 4;55(10):938-948. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaaa070.
8
Self-care in People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Research Protocol of a Multicenter Mixed Methods Study (SCUDO).2型糖尿病患者的自我护理:一项多中心混合方法研究(SCUDO)的研究方案
Prof Inferm. 2019 Jul-Sep;72(3):203-12. doi: 10.7429/pi.2019.723203.
9
Can the Routine Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Improve the Delivery of Person-Centered Diabetes Care? A Review of Recent Developments and a Case Study.患者报告结局测量的常规使用能否改善以患者为中心的糖尿病护理的提供?近期进展回顾和案例研究。
Curr Diab Rep. 2019 Aug 16;19(9):84. doi: 10.1007/s11892-019-1190-x.
10
Psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the short form of The Problem Areas in Diabetes scale (PAID-5): a validation study.《糖尿病问题领域量表短式 5 项版(PAID-5)挪威语版的心理测量学特性:验证研究》。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 21;9(2):e022903. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022903.

本文引用的文献

1
Diabetes Attitudes Wishes and Needs 2 (DAWN2): a multinational, multi-stakeholder study of psychosocial issues in diabetes and person-centred diabetes care.糖尿病态度愿望和需求 2(DAWN2):一项多国家、多利益相关者的研究,探讨糖尿病中的心理社会问题和以患者为中心的糖尿病护理。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2013 Feb;99(2):174-84. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2012.11.016. Epub 2012 Dec 27.
2
Psychometric and screening properties of the WHO-5 well-being index in adult outpatients with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus.1 型或 2 型糖尿病成年门诊患者 WHO-5 幸福指数的心理计量学和筛查特性。
Diabet Med. 2013 Feb;30(2):e63-9. doi: 10.1111/dme.12040.
3
Quality of diabetes care predicts the development of cardiovascular events: results of the AMD-QUASAR study.糖尿病护理质量预测心血管事件的发生:AMD-QUASAR 研究结果。
Diabetes Care. 2011 Feb;34(2):347-52. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1709.
4
Four-year impact of a continuous quality improvement effort implemented by a network of diabetes outpatient clinics: the AMD-Annals initiative.由糖尿病门诊诊所网络实施的持续质量改进工作的四年影响:AMD-Annals 计划。
Diabet Med. 2010 Sep;27(9):1041-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03055.x.
5
Development and evaluation of the short version of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care instrument.慢性病照护患者评估工具简版的开发与评估
Chronic Illn. 2009 Dec;5(4):268-76. doi: 10.1177/1742395309348072. Epub 2009 Nov 19.
6
The DAWN Youth WebTalk Study: methods, findings, and implications.“曙光”青少年网络谈话研究:方法、发现及启示
Pediatr Diabetes. 2009 Dec;10 Suppl 13:37-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2009.00612.x.
7
Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030.全球 2010 年和 2030 年糖尿病患病率估计。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010 Jan;87(1):4-14. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2009.10.007. Epub 2009 Nov 6.
8
Short-form measures of diabetes-related emotional distress: the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID)-5 and PAID-1.糖尿病相关情绪困扰的简式测量工具:糖尿病问题区域量表(PAID)-5 和 PAID-1。
Diabetologia. 2010 Jan;53(1):66-9. doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1559-5. Epub 2009 Oct 20.
9
Standards of medical care in diabetes--2009.《糖尿病医疗护理标准——2009》
Diabetes Care. 2009 Jan;32 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S13-61. doi: 10.2337/dc09-S013.
10
Baseline quality-of-care data from a quality-improvement program implemented by a network of diabetes outpatient clinics.来自糖尿病门诊诊所网络实施的质量改进项目的基线护理质量数据。
Diabetes Care. 2008 Nov;31(11):2166-8. doi: 10.2337/dc08-0469. Epub 2008 Aug 11.

糖尿病临床与人文结局基准网络(BENCH-D)研究:方案、工具与人群

Benchmarking network for clinical and humanistic outcomes in diabetes (BENCH-D) study: protocol, tools, and population.

作者信息

Nicolucci Antonio, Rossi Maria C, Pellegrini Fabio, Lucisano Giuseppe, Pintaudi Basilio, Gentile Sandro, Marra Giampiero, Skovlund Soren E, Vespasiani Giacomo

机构信息

Diabetes Unit, Madonna del Soccorso Hospital, San Benedetto del Tronto, AP Italy.

出版信息

Springerplus. 2014 Feb 12;3:83. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-83. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.1186/2193-1801-3-83
PMID:24600541
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3935032/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the context of the DAWN-2 initiatives, the BENCH-D Study aims to test a model of regional benchmarking to improve not only the quality of diabetes care, but also patient-centred outcomes.

METHODS/DESIGN: As part of the AMD-Annals quality improvement program, 32 diabetes clinics in 4 Italian regions extracted clinical data from electronic databases for measuring process and outcome quality indicators. A random sample of patients with type 2 diabetes filled in a questionnaire including validated instruments to assess patient-centred indicators: SF-12 Health Survey, WHO-5 Well-Being Index, Diabetes Empowerment Scale, Problem Areas in Diabetes, Health Care Climate Questionnaire, Patients Assessment of Chronic Illness Care, Barriers to Medications, Patient Support, Diabetes Self-care Activities, and Global Satisfaction for Diabetes Treatment. Data were discussed with participants in regional meetings. Main problems, obstacles and solutions were identified through a standardized process, and a regional mandate was produced to drive the priority actions. Overall, clinical indicators on 78,854 patients have been measured; additionally, 2,390 patients filled-in the questionnaire. The regional mandates were officially launched in March 2012. Clinical and patient-centred indicators will be evaluated again after 18 months. A final assessment of clinical indicators will take place after 30 months.

DISCUSSION

In the context of the BENCH-D study, a set of instruments has been validated to measure patient well-being and satisfaction with the care. In the four regional meetings, different priorities were identified, reflecting different organizational resources of the different areas. In all the regions, a major challenge was represented by the need of skills and instruments to address psychosocial issues of people with diabetes. The BENCH-D study allows a field testing of benchmarking activities focused on clinical and patient-centred indicators.

摘要

背景

在“DAWN - 2倡议”的背景下,“BENCH - D研究”旨在测试一种区域基准化模型,不仅要提高糖尿病护理质量,还要改善以患者为中心的治疗效果。

方法/设计:作为“AMD - 年刊质量改进计划”的一部分,意大利4个地区的32家糖尿病诊所从电子数据库中提取临床数据,以衡量过程质量指标和结果质量指标。随机抽取的2型糖尿病患者填写了一份问卷,其中包括经过验证的工具,用于评估以患者为中心的指标:SF - 12健康调查、WHO - 5幸福感指数、糖尿病赋权量表、糖尿病问题领域、医疗保健氛围问卷、慢性病护理患者评估、药物治疗障碍、患者支持、糖尿病自我护理活动以及糖尿病治疗总体满意度。数据在区域会议上与参与者进行了讨论。通过标准化流程确定了主要问题、障碍和解决方案,并制定了区域任务以推动优先行动。总体而言,已对78,854名患者的临床指标进行了测量;此外,2,390名患者填写了问卷。区域任务于2012年3月正式启动。18个月后将再次评估临床指标和以患者为中心的指标。30个月后将对临床指标进行最终评估。

讨论

在“BENCH - D研究”的背景下,已验证了一套工具来衡量患者的幸福感和对护理的满意度。在四次区域会议中,确定了不同的优先事项,反映了不同地区的不同组织资源。在所有地区,一个主要挑战是需要技能和工具来解决糖尿病患者的心理社会问题。“BENCH - D研究”允许对专注于临床指标和以患者为中心指标的基准化活动进行实地测试。