• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性病照护患者评估工具简版的开发与评估

Development and evaluation of the short version of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care instrument.

作者信息

Gugiu P Cristian, Coryn Chris, Clark Ruth, Kuehn April

机构信息

Interdisciplinary Ph.D. in Evaluation Program, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Chronic Illn. 2009 Dec;5(4):268-76. doi: 10.1177/1742395309348072. Epub 2009 Nov 19.

DOI:10.1177/1742395309348072
PMID:19933249
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) was developed for measuring the extent to which patients receive care congruent with the chronic care model (CCM). The purpose of this study was to develop a short version of the PACIC with better psychometric properties than the original instrument.

METHODS

Two samples of 529 and 361 type 2 diabetic patients completed a modified PACIC. A short-version PACIC instrument was developed and validated using parallel analysis to determine the number of factors, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) within an exploratory factor analysis framework (E/CFA) was conducted to explore the measurement structure of the full instrument, and a CFA was performed to confirm the hypothesized structure.

RESULTS

The results demonstrated that the PACIC is unidimensional and that it can be reduced to 11 items with no loss in psychometric properties. No demographic variables or clinical assays were found to be related to the PACIC.

DISCUSSION

A short-version PACIC is now available and ready for use in research with diabetic patients. Its use is encouraged in future research, particularly in the exploration of its validity against actual CCM services delivered and long-term clinical outcomes.

摘要

目的

慢性病照护患者评估量表(PACIC)旨在衡量患者接受符合慢性病照护模式(CCM)的照护程度。本研究的目的是开发一个比原始量表具有更好心理测量特性的PACIC简版。

方法

两个分别包含529名和361名2型糖尿病患者的样本完成了一份修改后的PACIC。通过平行分析确定因子数量,开发并验证了PACIC简版量表,在探索性因子分析框架内进行验证性因子分析(E/CFA)以探究完整量表的测量结构,并进行验证性因子分析以确认假设结构。

结果

结果表明,PACIC是单维的,可缩减为11个条目,且心理测量特性无损失。未发现人口统计学变量或临床检测指标与PACIC相关。

讨论

现在已有PACIC简版,可用于糖尿病患者的研究。鼓励在未来研究中使用该量表,特别是在探讨其与实际提供的CCM服务及长期临床结局的有效性方面。

相似文献

1
Development and evaluation of the short version of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care instrument.慢性病照护患者评估工具简版的开发与评估
Chronic Illn. 2009 Dec;5(4):268-76. doi: 10.1177/1742395309348072. Epub 2009 Nov 19.
2
Structure and measurement properties of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care instrument.慢性病照顾患者评估工具的结构和测量特性。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Jun;16(3):509-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01151.x. Epub 2010 Feb 22.
3
Adaptation, data quality and confirmatory factor analysis of the Danish version of the PACIC questionnaire.丹麦版 PACIC 问卷的适应度、数据质量和验证性因子分析。
Eur J Public Health. 2012 Feb;22(1):31-6. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckq188. Epub 2010 Dec 5.
4
Development and validation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC).慢性病照护患者评估量表(PACIC)的开发与验证
Med Care. 2005 May;43(5):436-44. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000160375.47920.8c.
5
Taking the PACIC back to basics: the structure of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care.将 PACIC 回归基础:慢性病护理患者评估的结构。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Apr;18(2):307-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01568.x. Epub 2010 Oct 25.
6
Modifying the PACIC to assess provision of chronic illness care: an exploratory study with primary health care nurses.修改患者对慢性病护理满意度调查问卷(PACIC)以评估慢性病护理服务:一项针对初级保健护士的探索性研究
J Prim Health Care. 2010 Jun;2(2):118-23.
7
The Chronic Care Model: congruency and predictors among primary care patients with osteoarthritis.慢性病照护模式:骨关节炎初级护理患者中的一致性及预测因素
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Dec;17(6):442-6. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.022822.
8
Spanish-language version of the MedRisk Instrument for Measuring Patient Satisfaction With Physical Therapy Care (MRPS): preliminary validation.用于衡量患者对物理治疗护理满意度的MedRisk工具(MRPS)的西班牙语版本:初步验证
Phys Ther. 2007 Jun;87(6):793-800. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20060313. Epub 2007 Apr 18.
9
German diabetes disease management programs are appropriate for restructuring care according to the chronic care model: an evaluation with the patient assessment of chronic illness care instrument.德国糖尿病疾病管理项目适用于根据慢性病护理模式进行护理重组:使用慢性病护理患者评估工具进行的一项评估
Diabetes Care. 2008 Jun;31(6):1150-4. doi: 10.2337/dc07-2104. Epub 2008 Feb 25.
10
Evaluation of a culturally adapted German version of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC 5A) questionnaire in a sample of osteoarthritis patients.在骨关节炎患者样本中对经文化调适的德语版慢性病患者护理评估问卷(PACIC 5A)进行评估。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Oct;13(5):806-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00786.x.

引用本文的文献

1
PACIC: patient activation and problem solving not related to age in patients with depressive symptoms.PACIC:抑郁症状患者中与年龄无关的患者激活和问题解决能力
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2025 Aug 6. doi: 10.1007/s00406-025-02061-5.
2
Trust in the Transplant Team Associated With the Level of Chronic Illness Management-A Secondary Data Analysis of the International BRIGHT Study.与慢性疾病管理水平相关的移植团队信任度——BRIGHT 国际研究的二次数据分析。
Transpl Int. 2024 Mar 11;37:11704. doi: 10.3389/ti.2024.11704. eCollection 2024.
3
Community health navigator-assisted transition of care from hospital to community: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
社区健康导航员辅助医院到社区的转院护理:一项随机对照试验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 2;14(2):e077877. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077877.
4
Feasibility, validity and reliability of the ASCOT-Proxy and ASCOT-Carer among unpaid carers of people living with dementia in England.英国痴呆症患者非付费照顾者中 ASCOT-Proxy 和 ASCOT-Carer 的可行性、有效性和可靠性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Jun 3;21(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02122-0.
5
HbA1c as a shared treatment goal in type 2 diabetes? A secondary analysis of the DEBATE trial.HbA1c 作为 2 型糖尿病的共同治疗目标?DEBATE 试验的二次分析。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 May 13;24(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02067-9.
6
Psychometric evaluation and Rasch analyses of the German Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS-D).德国总体焦虑严重程度和障碍量表(OASIS-D)的心理计量学评估和 Rasch 分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 26;13(1):6840. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33355-0.
7
Local, collaborative, stepped, and personalized care management for older people with chronic diseases - results from the randomized controlled LoChro-trial.针对慢性病老年人的本地化、协作式、分级和个体化的护理管理 - 来自随机对照 LoChro 试验的结果。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Feb 13;23(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03797-2.
8
Depressive primary care patients' assessment of received collaborative care.抑郁性初级保健患者对接受的协作式护理的评估。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 9;13(1):2329. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29339-9.
9
Predictors and outcomes in primary depression care (POKAL) - a research training group develops an innovative approach to collaborative care.原发性抑郁症治疗中的预测因素和结局(POKAL) - 一个研究培训组开发出一种创新的合作护理方法。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Dec 2;23(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01913-6.
10
Unraveling implementation context: the Basel Approach for coNtextual ANAlysis (BANANA) in implementation science and its application in the SMILe project.解析实施背景:实施科学中的巴塞尔情境分析方法(BANANA)及其在SMILe项目中的应用。
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Oct 1;3(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00354-7.