• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

献血者身份调查:献血者动机的多维度测量

The blood donor identity survey: a multidimensional measure of blood donor motivations.

作者信息

France Christopher R, Kowalsky Jennifer M, France Janis L, Himawan Lina K, Kessler Debra A, Shaz Beth H

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio.

出版信息

Transfusion. 2014 Aug;54(8):2098-105. doi: 10.1111/trf.12588. Epub 2014 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1111/trf.12588
PMID:24601946
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence indicates that donor identity is an important predictor of donation behavior; however, prior studies have relied on diverse, unidimensional measures with limited psychometric support. The goals of this study were to examine the application of self-determination theory to blood donor motivations and to develop and validate a related multidimensional measure of donor identity.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Items were developed and administered electronically to a sample of New York Blood Center (NYBC) donors (n=582) and then to a sample of Ohio University students (n=1005). Following initial confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on the NYBC sample to identify key items related to self-determination theory's six motivational factors, a revised survey was administered to the university sample to reexamine model fit and to assess survey reliability and validity.

RESULTS

Consistent with self-determination theory, for both samples CFAs indicated that the best fit to the data was provided by a six-motivational-factor model, including amotivation, external regulation, introjected regulation, identified regulation, integrated regulation, and intrinsic regulation.

CONCLUSION

The Blood Donor Identity Survey provides a psychometrically sound, multidimensional measure of donor motivations (ranging from unmotivated to donate to increasing levels of autonomous motivation to donate) that is suitable for nondonors as well as donors with varying levels of experience. Future research is needed to examine longitudinal changes in donor identity and its relationship to actual donation behavior.

摘要

背景

有证据表明,献血者身份是献血行为的一个重要预测因素;然而,先前的研究依赖于多样的、单维的测量方法,且心理测量学支持有限。本研究的目的是检验自我决定理论在献血者动机方面的应用,并开发和验证一种相关的献血者身份多维测量方法。

研究设计与方法

编制条目并以电子方式发放给纽约血液中心(NYBC)的献血者样本(n = 582),然后发放给俄亥俄大学的学生样本(n = 1005)。在对NYBC样本进行初始验证性因素分析(CFA)以确定与自我决定理论的六个动机因素相关的关键条目之后,对大学样本进行修订后的调查,以重新检验模型拟合情况,并评估调查的信度和效度。

结果

与自我决定理论一致,对于两个样本,CFA均表明,六动机因素模型对数据的拟合最佳,该模型包括无动机、外部调节、内摄调节、认同调节、整合调节和内在调节。

结论

献血者身份调查提供了一种心理测量学上合理的、多维的献血者动机测量方法(范围从不愿意献血到自主献血动机增强),适用于非献血者以及不同经验水平的献血者。未来需要进行研究,以考察献血者身份的纵向变化及其与实际献血行为的关系。

相似文献

1
The blood donor identity survey: a multidimensional measure of blood donor motivations.献血者身份调查:献血者动机的多维度测量
Transfusion. 2014 Aug;54(8):2098-105. doi: 10.1111/trf.12588. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
2
Blood donors and factors impacting the blood donation decision: motives for donating blood in Turkish sample.献血者及影响献血决策的因素:土耳其样本中献血的动机
Transfus Apher Sci. 2013 Dec;49(3):468-73. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2013.04.044. Epub 2013 May 23.
3
Factors influencing donor return.影响捐赠者回访的因素。
Transfusion. 2008 Feb;48(2):264-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01519.x. Epub 2007 Nov 13.
4
A brief motivational interview promotes internal motivation to donate blood among young adults with and without a prior donation history.简短的动机性访谈可促进有或无献血史的年轻人献血的内在动机。
Transfusion. 2017 Jun;57(6):1527-1535. doi: 10.1111/trf.14073. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
5
A motivational interview promotes retention of blood donors with high internal motivation.动机性访谈有助于留住具有高度内在动机的献血者。
Transfusion. 2017 Oct;57(10):2433-2439. doi: 10.1111/trf.14203. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
6
Integrating self-determination theory and the theory of planned behaviour to predict intention to donate blood.整合自我决定理论和计划行为理论以预测献血意愿。
Transfus Med. 2019 Apr;29 Suppl 1:59-64. doi: 10.1111/tme.12566. Epub 2018 Nov 11.
7
Motivation in Italian whole blood donors and the role of commitment.意大利全血献血者的动机和承诺的作用。
Psychol Health Med. 2011 Dec;16(6):641-9. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2011.569731. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
8
Why don't young people volunteer to give blood? An investigation of the correlates of donation intentions among young nondonors.为什么年轻人不自愿献血?一项关于年轻非献血者献血意愿相关因素的调查。
Transfusion. 2005 Jun;45(6):945-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.04379.x.
9
Predicting blood donation intentions and behavior among Australian blood donors: testing an extended theory of planned behavior model.预测澳大利亚献血者的献血意愿和行为:检验计划行为理论扩展模型
Transfusion. 2009 Feb;49(2):320-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01981.x.
10
Predicting the retention of first-time donors using an extended Theory of Planned Behavior.运用扩展计划行为理论预测首次献血者的保留率。
Transfusion. 2012 Jun;52(6):1303-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03479.x. Epub 2012 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of the self-regulation of blood donation scale for blood donors.献血者献血自我调节量表的编制与验证
Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. 2024 Dec;46 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S299-S305. doi: 10.1016/j.htct.2024.09.2482. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
2
The infected blood inquiry: Impact on public perceptions of blood supply risk, safety, and donation attitudes.感染血液调查:对公众对血液供应风险、安全性及献血态度的影响。
Transfus Med. 2024 Dec;34(6):478-490. doi: 10.1111/tme.13108. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
3
Longitudinal relationship between pre-exposure prophylaxis motivation and change in adherence among men who have sex with men in Western China.
中国西部男男性行为者中,暴露前预防用药动机与坚持服药行为变化的纵向关系。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 2;24(1):1271. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18729-x.
4
Warming up cool cooperators.温暖冷漠的合作者。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Nov;7(11):1917-1932. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01687-6. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
5
The Effect of Functional Motivation on Future Intention to Donate Blood: Moderating Role of the Blood Donor's Stage.功能性动机对未来献血意向的影响:献血者阶段的调节作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 29;18(17):9115. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179115.
6
Results from the blood donor competence, autonomy, and relatedness enhancement (blood donor CARE) randomized trial.血液捐献者能力、自主性和相关性增强(blood donor CARE)随机试验结果。
Transfusion. 2021 Sep;61(9):2637-2649. doi: 10.1111/trf.16577. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
7
Evaluating blood donor experiences and barriers/facilitators to blood donation in the United States using YouTube video content.评估美国献血者的体验以及献血的障碍/促进因素,使用 YouTube 视频内容。
Transfusion. 2021 Sep;61(9):2650-2657. doi: 10.1111/trf.16568. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
8
The influence of sociodemographic and donation behaviour characteristics on blood donation motivations.社会人口学和献血行为特征对献血动机的影响。
Blood Transfus. 2021 Sep;19(5):366-375. doi: 10.2450/2021.0193-20. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
9
Use of a rapid electronic survey methodology to estimate blood donors' potential exposure to emerging infectious diseases: Application of a statistically representative sampling methodology to assess risk in US blood centers.使用快速电子调查方法学估算献血者潜在暴露于新发传染病的风险:统计代表性抽样方法学在评估美国采供血机构风险中的应用。
Transfusion. 2020 Sep;60(9):1987-1997. doi: 10.1111/trf.15941. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
10
Reasons of under-representation of Iranian women in blood donation.伊朗女性献血人数不足的原因。
Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. 2021 Jul-Sep;43(3):256-262. doi: 10.1016/j.htct.2020.03.009. Epub 2020 Jun 17.