• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动机性访谈有助于留住具有高度内在动机的献血者。

A motivational interview promotes retention of blood donors with high internal motivation.

作者信息

France Christopher R, France Janis L, Carlson Bruce W, Himawan Lina K, Kessler Debra A, Rebosa Mark, Shaz Beth H, Madden Katrala, Carey Patricia M, Slepian P Maxwell, Ankawi Brett, Livitz Irina E, Fox Kristen R

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio.

New York Blood Center, New York, New York.

出版信息

Transfusion. 2017 Oct;57(10):2433-2439. doi: 10.1111/trf.14203. Epub 2017 Jul 3.

DOI:10.1111/trf.14203
PMID:28671277
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5612846/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Based on the hypothesis that self-determined motivation is associated with an increased likelihood of future behavior, the present study examined the ability of a motivational interview to promote internal motivation for giving blood and future donation attempts.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A sample of 484 recent whole-blood and double red blood cell donors (62.4% female; age = 30.2 ± 11.8 years) were randomly assigned to either a telephone-delivered motivational interview or a control call approximately 6 weeks after donating. Several weeks before the call and again 1 week after the call, participants completed the Blood Donor Identity Survey, a multidimensional measure of donor motivation, to derive indices of amotivation, external motivation, and internal motivation to give blood. Repeat donation attempts were tracked using blood center records.

RESULTS

Relative to controls, participants in the motivational interview group showed a shift toward more self-determined motivation, as indicated by significant decreases in amotivation (p = 0.01) and significant increases in external (p = 0.009) and internal (p = 0.002) motivation. Furthermore, those with initially high levels of autonomous motivation were more likely to make a donation attempt in the subsequent year if they completed the motivational interview (71.1%) versus the control call (55.1%).

CONCLUSION

Motivational interviewing is a potentially useful strategy to enhance retention of existing blood donors, particularly among those who express a greater sense of internal motivation for giving.

摘要

背景

基于自我决定动机与未来行为可能性增加相关的假设,本研究考察了动机性访谈促进献血内在动机和未来献血尝试的能力。

研究设计与方法

484名近期的全血和双份红细胞献血者样本(62.4%为女性;年龄 = 30.2 ± 11.8岁)在献血后约6周被随机分配接受电话动机性访谈或对照通话。在通话前几周和通话后1周,参与者完成了献血者身份调查,这是一种对献血者动机的多维度测量,以得出无动机、外部动机和献血内在动机的指标。使用血库记录追踪重复献血尝试情况。

结果

与对照组相比,动机性访谈组的参与者表现出向更多自我决定动机的转变,表现为无动机显著降低(p = 0.01),外部动机(p = 0.009)和内部动机(p = 0.002)显著增加。此外,那些最初具有较高自主动机水平的人,如果完成动机性访谈,在随后一年进行献血尝试的可能性更大(71.1%),而接受对照通话的比例为(55.1%)。

结论

动机性访谈是提高现有献血者留存率的一种潜在有用策略,特别是在那些表现出更强献血内在动机的人中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b17/5612846/5bb8781840c7/nihms877382f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b17/5612846/766cc75b6493/nihms877382f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b17/5612846/6227f3972a49/nihms877382f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b17/5612846/a1e3f00723e1/nihms877382f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b17/5612846/5bb8781840c7/nihms877382f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b17/5612846/766cc75b6493/nihms877382f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b17/5612846/6227f3972a49/nihms877382f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b17/5612846/a1e3f00723e1/nihms877382f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b17/5612846/5bb8781840c7/nihms877382f4.jpg

相似文献

1
A motivational interview promotes retention of blood donors with high internal motivation.动机性访谈有助于留住具有高度内在动机的献血者。
Transfusion. 2017 Oct;57(10):2433-2439. doi: 10.1111/trf.14203. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
2
A brief motivational interview with action and coping planning components enhances motivational autonomy among volunteer blood donors.一次包含行动和应对计划要素的简短动机性访谈可增强无偿献血者的动机自主性。
Transfusion. 2016 Jun;56(6 Pt 2):1636-44. doi: 10.1111/trf.13485. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
3
A brief motivational interview promotes internal motivation to donate blood among young adults with and without a prior donation history.简短的动机性访谈可促进有或无献血史的年轻人献血的内在动机。
Transfusion. 2017 Jun;57(6):1527-1535. doi: 10.1111/trf.14073. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
4
An automated motivational interview promotes donation intention and self-efficacy among experienced whole blood donors.自动化动机性访谈可提高有经验的全血献血者的捐赠意愿和自我效能感。
Transfusion. 2019 Sep;59(9):2876-2884. doi: 10.1111/trf.15402. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
5
Applying self-determination theory to the blood donation context: The blood donor competence, autonomy, and relatedness enhancement (Blood Donor CARE) trial.将自我决定理论应用于献血情境:献血者能力、自主性及关联性增强(献血者关怀)试验
Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Feb;53:44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.12.010. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
6
Online responses to motivational interview questions enhance blood donation intention.对动机访谈问题的在线回复可增强献血意愿。
Transfusion. 2018 Dec;58(12):2874-2879. doi: 10.1111/trf.14874. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
7
Assessing the impact of an automated Web-based motivational interview on the intention and return behavior of Australian O-negative donors.评估基于网络的自动化动机性访谈对澳大利亚 O 型阴性献血者的意愿和回归行为的影响。
Transfusion. 2021 Apr;61(4):1122-1133. doi: 10.1111/trf.16234. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
8
An adapted postdonation motivational interview enhances blood donor retention.改编后的捐血后激励性访谈可提高献血者保留率。
Transfusion. 2010 Aug;50(8):1778-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02618.x. Epub 2010 Apr 23.
9
The blood donor identity survey: a multidimensional measure of blood donor motivations.献血者身份调查:献血者动机的多维度测量
Transfusion. 2014 Aug;54(8):2098-105. doi: 10.1111/trf.12588. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
10
Motivating first-time, group O blood donors to return: Rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial of a post-donation telephone interview.激励首次献血的O型血献血者再次献血:献血后电话访谈随机对照试验的基本原理与设计
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Sep;44:64-69. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.07.020. Epub 2015 Aug 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Blood Donation Fear, Perceived Rewards, Self-Efficacy, and Intention to Return Among Whole Blood Donors in China: A Social Cognitive Perspective.中国全血捐献者的献血恐惧、感知回报、自我效能感及再次献血意愿:社会认知视角
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 22;12:683709. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.683709. eCollection 2021.
2
Results from the blood donor competence, autonomy, and relatedness enhancement (blood donor CARE) randomized trial.血液捐献者能力、自主性和相关性增强(blood donor CARE)随机试验结果。
Transfusion. 2021 Sep;61(9):2637-2649. doi: 10.1111/trf.16577. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
3
Knowledge level and motivation of Hong Kong young adults towards blood donation: a cross-sectional survey.

本文引用的文献

1
A brief motivational interview promotes internal motivation to donate blood among young adults with and without a prior donation history.简短的动机性访谈可促进有或无献血史的年轻人献血的内在动机。
Transfusion. 2017 Jun;57(6):1527-1535. doi: 10.1111/trf.14073. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
2
Applying self-determination theory to the blood donation context: The blood donor competence, autonomy, and relatedness enhancement (Blood Donor CARE) trial.将自我决定理论应用于献血情境:献血者能力、自主性及关联性增强(献血者关怀)试验
Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Feb;53:44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.12.010. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
3
How Can We Improve Retention of the First-Time Donor? A Systematic Review of the Current Evidence.
香港青年对献血的认知水平和动机:一项横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 19;10(1):e031865. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031865.
我们如何提高首次献血者的保留率?对现有证据的系统评价。
Transfus Med Rev. 2016 Apr;30(2):81-91. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
4
A brief motivational interview with action and coping planning components enhances motivational autonomy among volunteer blood donors.一次包含行动和应对计划要素的简短动机性访谈可增强无偿献血者的动机自主性。
Transfusion. 2016 Jun;56(6 Pt 2):1636-44. doi: 10.1111/trf.13485. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
5
Easy come, easy go. Retention of blood donors.来得容易,去得快。献血者的保留。
Transfus Med. 2015 Aug;25(4):227-33. doi: 10.1111/tme.12249. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
6
Motivating first-time, group O blood donors to return: Rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial of a post-donation telephone interview.激励首次献血的O型血献血者再次献血:献血后电话访谈随机对照试验的基本原理与设计
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Sep;44:64-69. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.07.020. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
7
Self-Determination Theory Applied to Health Contexts: A Meta-Analysis.自我决定理论在健康领域的应用:一项元分析。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Jul;7(4):325-40. doi: 10.1177/1745691612447309.
8
Development of common metrics for donation attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, and intention for the blood donation context.开发献血情境下的捐献态度、主观规范、感知行为控制和意愿的通用度量标准。
Transfusion. 2014 Mar;54(3 Pt 2):839-47. doi: 10.1111/trf.12471. Epub 2013 Oct 28.
9
The blood donor identity survey: a multidimensional measure of blood donor motivations.献血者身份调查:献血者动机的多维度测量
Transfusion. 2014 Aug;54(8):2098-105. doi: 10.1111/trf.12588. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
10
A systematic review and meta-analysis of antecedents of blood donation behavior and intentions.一项关于献血行为和意愿的前因的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Nov;96:86-94. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.07.022. Epub 2013 Aug 1.