Knobe M, Siebert C H
Klinik für Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland,
Orthopade. 2014 Apr;43(4):314-24. doi: 10.1007/s00132-014-2265-7.
Osteoporotic fractures of the femoral neck and trochanteric region pose an ever-expanding existential problem both for the individual and for society. Despite numerous innovations and advances regarding implant design, mortality and the systemic and mechanical complication rates remain high.
Depiction of treatment options for femoral neck fractures and trochanteric femur fractures in the elderly comparing joint replacement and osteosynthesis.
A search of the Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases was carried out focusing on hip fracture treatment. Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses and reviews comparing joint replacement or fixation implants in the elderly were included.
Displaced fractures of the femoral neck often require total joint arthroplasty whereas trochanteric fractures are amenable to internal fixation. Cemented total hip replacement as opposed to cementless techniques is recommended in the elderly and yields good functional results in active patients. Hemiarthroplasty is the treatment of choice in infirm patients with multiple comorbidities and cognitive impairment. Trochanteric fractures (AO/OTA types A1 and A2) can be successfully treated with intramedullary or extramedullary fixation. Adequate reduction and stable fixation are prerequisites for uneventful healing. A meticulous operative technique can prevent iatrogenic complications.
In summary, there are many parameters affecting the outcome in the treatment of fragility and hip fractures. Technical features as well as surgeon characteristics play an important role and the ultimate solution has yet to be developed. Even though fracture morphology may indicate a specific treatment option, patient characteristics play an important role in decision-making. The development of centers of fragility fracture care in Germany could help to lower the complication rate and increase quality of life in hip fracture patients in the future.
股骨颈和转子区骨质疏松性骨折给个人和社会都带来了日益严重的生存问题。尽管在植入物设计方面有众多创新和进展,但死亡率以及全身和机械并发症发生率仍然很高。
比较关节置换和骨接合术,描述老年人股骨颈骨折和股骨转子骨折的治疗选择。
对Medline、Embase和Cochrane数据库进行检索,重点关注髋部骨折治疗。纳入比较老年人关节置换或固定植入物的随机或半随机对照试验、荟萃分析和综述。
股骨颈移位骨折通常需要全关节置换,而转子骨折适合内固定。对于老年人,推荐使用骨水泥型全髋关节置换而非非骨水泥技术,在活跃患者中可产生良好的功能结果。半髋关节置换是患有多种合并症和认知障碍的体弱患者的首选治疗方法。转子骨折(AO/OTA A1和A2型)可用髓内或髓外固定成功治疗。充分复位和稳定固定是顺利愈合的先决条件。细致的手术技术可预防医源性并发症。
总之,在脆性骨折和髋部骨折治疗中,有许多参数会影响治疗结果。技术特点以及外科医生的特征起着重要作用,最终解决方案尚未开发出来。尽管骨折形态可能表明特定的治疗选择,但患者特征在决策中也起着重要作用。德国脆性骨折护理中心的发展可能有助于降低并发症发生率并提高未来髋部骨折患者的生活质量。