Suppr超能文献

利用电子患者报告反馈干预措施改善晚期癌症儿童的护理:来自 PediQUEST 随机对照试验的结果。

Improving the care of children with advanced cancer by using an electronic patient-reported feedback intervention: results from the PediQUEST randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Joanne Wolfe, Christina Ullrich, Jane C. Weeks, and Veronica Dussel, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Joanne Wolfe and Christina Ullrich, Boston Children's Hospital; Joanne Wolfe, Christina Ullrich, and Jane C. Weeks, Harvard Medical School; E. Francis Cook, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Liliana Orellana, University of Buenos Aires; Veronica Dussel, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Tammy Kang and Chris Feudtner, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; and Jeffrey Russell Geyer, Seattle Children's Hospital, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2014 Apr 10;32(11):1119-26. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.51.5981. Epub 2014 Mar 10.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine whether feeding back patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to providers and families of children with advanced cancer improves symptom distress and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study was a parallel, multicentered pilot randomized controlled trial. At most once per week, children age ≥ 2 years old with advanced cancer or their parent completed the computer-based Pediatric Quality of Life and Evaluation of Symptoms Technology (PediQUEST) survey consisting of age- and respondent-adapted versions of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS), Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL4.0), and an overall Sickness question. In the intervention group (n = 51), oncologists and families received printed reports summarizing PROs; e-mails were sent to oncologists and subspecialists when predetermined scores were exceeded. No feedback was provided in the control group (n = 53). Primary outcomes included linear trends of MSAS, PedsQL4.0 total and subscale scores, and Sickness scores during 20 weeks of follow-up, along with child, parent, and provider satisfaction with PediQUEST feedback.

RESULTS

Feedback did not significantly affect average MSAS, PedsQL4.0, or Sickness score trends. Post hoc subgroup analyses among children age ≥ 8 years who survived 20 weeks showed that feedback improved PedsQL4.0 emotional (+8.1; 95% CI, 1.8 to 14.4) and Sickness (-8.2; 95% CI, -14.2 to -2.2) scores. PediQUEST reports were valued by children, parents, and providers and contributed at least sometimes to physician initiation of a psychosocial consult (56%).

CONCLUSION

Although routine feedback of PROs did not significantly affect the child's symptoms or HRQoL, changes were in expected directions and improvements observed in emotional HRQoL through exploratory analyses were encouraging. Importantly, children, parents, and providers value PRO feedback.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定向患有晚期癌症的儿童的提供者和家属反馈患者报告的结局(PROs)是否能改善症状困扰和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。

患者和方法

本研究为平行、多中心的试点随机对照试验。年龄≥2 岁的患有晚期癌症的儿童或其父母每星期最多完成一次基于计算机的儿科生存质量和症状评估技术(PediQUEST)调查,该调查包括年龄和受访者适应的纪念症状评估量表(MSAS)、儿科生存质量量表 4.0 通用核心量表(PedsQL4.0)以及整体疾病问题的版本。在干预组(n=51)中,肿瘤医生和家属收到了总结 PROs 的打印报告;当超过预定分数时,会向肿瘤医生和专家发送电子邮件。在对照组(n=53)中则不提供反馈。主要结局包括在 20 周的随访期间 MSAS、PedsQL4.0 总分和子量表评分以及疾病评分的线性趋势,以及儿童、家长和提供者对 PediQUEST 反馈的满意度。

结果

反馈并没有显著影响平均 MSAS、PedsQL4.0 或疾病评分的趋势。在 20 周存活的年龄≥8 岁儿童的事后亚组分析中,反馈改善了 PedsQL4.0 情绪(+8.1;95%置信区间,1.8 至 14.4)和疾病评分(-8.2;95%置信区间,-14.2 至-2.2)。儿童、家长和提供者都非常重视 PediQUEST 报告,报告至少有时会促使医生发起心理社会咨询(56%)。

结论

虽然 PRO 的常规反馈并没有显著影响儿童的症状或 HRQoL,但变化的方向是预期的,通过探索性分析观察到的情绪 HRQoL 的改善是令人鼓舞的。重要的是,儿童、家长和提供者都重视 PRO 反馈。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验