Suppr超能文献

验证一种用于评估资源匮乏环境下院前创伤死亡率负担的口述尸检工具。

Validating a verbal autopsy tool to assess pre-hospital trauma mortality burden in a resource-poor setting.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Trop Med Int Health. 2014 Apr;19(4):407-12. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12268. Epub 2014 Mar 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To present the validation of a verbal autopsy (VA) tool using inpatient deaths in order to ultimately assess the burden of adult pre-hospital trauma mortality in Lilongwe, Malawi.

METHODS

A WHO VA tool was administered at the Kamuzu Central Hospital (KCH) morgue in Lilongwe to family members of inpatient deceased. Two physicians assigned cause of death as 'trauma' or 'non-trauma' as well as a standard VA cause of death based on the VA tool. These assignments were compared to the 'gold standard' of physician review of hospital records using a kappa statistic.

RESULTS

The VA method had near-perfect agreement with the hospital record in determining 'trauma' vs. 'non-trauma'. There was moderate agreement when comparing types of death, for example cardiovascular vs. infectious disease, and limited agreement when comparing specific causes of death.

CONCLUSION

This VA tool can accurately ascertain trauma-related mortality with almost perfect agreement. The next step is to assess pre-hospital trauma mortality burden using the VA tool to determine whether hospital records underestimate the burden of trauma in the community.

摘要

目的

通过对住院死亡患者进行验证,介绍一种使用口头尸检(VA)工具的方法,以便最终评估马拉维利隆圭市成年院前创伤死亡率的负担。

方法

在利隆圭的卡姆祖中心医院(KCH)太平间,向住院死亡患者的家属使用世界卫生组织的 VA 工具。两名医生将死因归类为“创伤”或“非创伤”,以及根据 VA 工具确定的标准 VA 死因。这些分配与使用kappa 统计的医生查看医院记录的“金标准”进行比较。

结果

VA 方法在确定“创伤”与“非创伤”方面与医院记录几乎完全一致。在比较心血管疾病与传染病等类型的死亡时,具有中度一致性,而在比较具体死因时,一致性有限。

结论

该 VA 工具可以准确确定与创伤相关的死亡率,且几乎完全一致。下一步是使用 VA 工具评估院前创伤死亡率的负担,以确定医院记录是否低估了社区中创伤的负担。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验