Suppr超能文献

肠杆菌科细菌对头孢噻肟和厄他培南的耐药性:改变临床断点的影响

Antimicrobial resistance to cefotaxime and ertapenem in Enterobacteriaceae: the effects of altering clinical breakpoints.

作者信息

Liu Po-Yu, Shi Zhi-Yuan, Tung Kwong-Chung, Shyu Ching-Lin, Chan Kun-Wei, Liu Jai-Wen, Wu Zong-Yen, Kao Chih-Chuan, Huang Yi-Ching, Lin Chin-Fu

机构信息

Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Infect Dev Ctries. 2014 Mar 13;8(3):289-96. doi: 10.3855/jidc.3335.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) updated its antimicrobial susceptibility testing interpretation criteria for Enterobacteriaceae. This study assessed the effects of clinical breakpoint changes in the CLSI 2009 to 2012 guidelines on antibiotic susceptibility testing reports.

METHODOLOGY

In total, 2,076 non-duplicate clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae were analyzed. The disk diffusion method was used for susceptibility testing. The CLSI 2009-12 clinical breakpoints were applied to determine susceptibility of cefotaxime and ertapenem. Combined-disk testing was used for phenotypic confirmation of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) production.

RESULTS

In total, Enterobacteriaceae resistance rates to cefotaxime increased from 13.1% using the CLSI 2009 guidelines to 23.6% with the CLSI 2010-12 guidelines, and the resistance rates to ertapenem were 0.4%, 1.0% and 0.8% with CLSI 2009, 2011 and 2012, respectively. Based on the 2010-12 CLSI criteria, all ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were resistant to cefotaxime. Marked differences in susceptibility to ertapenem between the 2009 CLSI criteria and 2012-12 CLSI criteria were noted in ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae.

CONCLUSIONS

Breakpoints changes in the updated CLSI guidelines resulted in higher resistance rates to cefotaxime and ertapenem. In addition, the effects were different in individual Enterobacteriaceae species. As a result, clinicians may opt to use alternative antimicrobial agents. Upon implementation of the newer CLSI guidelines, laboratories should be aware of the possible consequences and closely monitor the effects.

摘要

引言

临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)更新了肠杆菌科细菌的抗菌药物敏感性试验解释标准。本研究评估了CLSI 2009至2012年指南中临床断点变化对抗生素敏感性试验报告的影响。

方法

共分析了2076株非重复的肠杆菌科临床分离株。采用纸片扩散法进行敏感性试验。应用CLSI 2009 - 12年临床断点来确定头孢噻肟和厄他培南的敏感性。采用复合纸片试验对超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)产生进行表型确认。

结果

总体而言,肠杆菌科对头孢噻肟的耐药率从使用CLSI 2009年指南时的13.1%增加到CLSI 2010 - 12年指南时的23.6%,而对厄他培南的耐药率在CLSI 2009年、2011年和2012年分别为0.4%、1.0%和0.8%。根据2010 - 12年CLSI标准,所有产ESBL的大肠埃希菌和肺炎克雷伯菌对头孢噻肟耐药。在产ESBL的肺炎克雷伯菌中,注意到2009年CLSI标准和2012 - 12年CLSI标准之间对厄他培南的敏感性存在显著差异。

结论

CLSI更新指南中的断点变化导致对头孢噻肟和厄他培南的耐药率升高。此外,对个别肠杆菌科菌种的影响有所不同。因此,临床医生可能会选择使用替代抗菌药物。在实施更新的CLSI指南后,实验室应意识到可能的后果并密切监测其影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验