Zaidi Shirin, Kat Martin G, de Jonghe Jos F M
Department of Psychology,Stichting Topaz,Leiden,the Netherlands.
Department of Geriatric Medicine,Medical Centre Alkmaar,Alkmaar,the Netherlands.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2014 Jul;26(7):1139-45. doi: 10.1017/S1041610214000295. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are highly prevalent in dementia. The recently developed Neuropsychiatric Inventory - Clinician rating scale (NPI-C) includes clinical judgment and new symptom domains. Our objective was to evaluate NPI-C reliability and to compare caregiver and clinician ratings across the range of mild to severe cognitive impairment.
This is a cross-sectional observational study. Participants were geriatric memory clinic patients and nursing-home residents (n = 30) with an established diagnosis of dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). A psychiatrist (MK) interviewed caregiver-patient dyads using the NPI-C. Neuropsychological tests and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) were used to assess cognitive impairment. Two NPI-C caregiver interviews were videotaped and rated by psychologists and geriatricians. Intra-class correlations (ICCs) were used to examine inter-rater agreement. Correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate caregiver and psychiatrist NPI-C ratings. Disagreement between caregiver and clinician was expressed in delta scores and examined across the range of mild to severe cognitive impairment, using Levene's homogeneity of variances tests.
Inter-rater agreement on ratings of two caregiver videos was high (ICC = 0.99-1.0). Clinician-caregiver concordance on NPI-C total severity ratings was high (r = 0.77). Variability in clinician-caregiver concordance was associated with cognitive impairment: MMSE (P = 0.02), CAMCOG-R (Cambridge Cognitive Examination-revised) total scores (P = 0.02), CAMCOG-R Memory scores (P = 0.04) and Language scores (P = 0.01).
The NPI-C is a reliable measure of NPS in patients with MCI or dementia. Clinician-caregiver agreement on NPS severity may vary with cognitive impairment, underlining the importance of clinician-based measures of NPS.
神经精神症状(NPS)在痴呆症中极为常见。最近开发的神经精神科问卷-临床医生评定量表(NPI-C)包含临床判断和新的症状领域。我们的目的是评估NPI-C的可靠性,并比较照顾者和临床医生对轻度至重度认知障碍患者的评定。
这是一项横断面观察性研究。参与者为老年记忆门诊患者和养老院居民(n = 30),他们已确诊患有痴呆症或轻度认知障碍(MCI)。一名精神科医生(MK)使用NPI-C对照顾者-患者二元组进行访谈。采用神经心理测试和简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)评估认知障碍。对两次NPI-C照顾者访谈进行录像,并由心理学家和老年病学家进行评分。组内相关系数(ICC)用于检验评分者间的一致性。计算相关系数以评估照顾者和精神科医生的NPI-C评分。照顾者与临床医生之间的分歧用差值分数表示,并使用Levene方差齐性检验在轻度至重度认知障碍范围内进行检验。
两位照顾者录像评分的评分者间一致性较高(ICC = 0.99 - 1.0)。临床医生与照顾者在NPI-C总严重程度评分上的一致性较高(r = 0.77)。临床医生与照顾者一致性的变异性与认知障碍相关:MMSE(P = 0.02)、CAMCOG-R(修订版剑桥认知检查)总分(P = 0.02)、CAMCOG-R记忆评分(P = 0.04)和语言评分(P = 0.01)。
NPI-C是评估MCI或痴呆症患者NPS的可靠指标。临床医生与照顾者在NPS严重程度上的一致性可能因认知障碍而异,这突出了基于临床医生的NPS测量方法的重要性。