Suppr超能文献

恶性间皮瘤组织学中唾液酸化SSEA-1抗原与癌胚抗原的比较,特别提及肺腺癌

[A comparison of the sialyl SSEA-1 antigen and CEA in the histology of malignant mesothelioma, with special reference to adenocarcinoma of the lung].

作者信息

Kishimoto T, Okada K, Shimamoto F, Sato T, Ono T

机构信息

Dept. of Clinical Investigation, Kure Kyosai Hospital.

出版信息

Gan No Rinsho. 1988 Nov;34(14):1951-5.

PMID:2462647
Abstract

Tumor tissues obtained from 5 cases of malignant mesothelioma and from 5 cases of primary adenocarcinoma of the lung have been studied on staining with the sialyl SSEA-1 antibody by the PAP method. Results in all cases of a malignant mesothelioma (both Epithelioid and Sarcomatous pattern) were absolutely negative. All cases of lung cancer, however, were positive, though in differing degrees. In evaluating a malignant mesothelioma, many reports have indicated that the negativity of CEA staining is useful in achieving the differential diagnosis from lung cancer. The sensitivity of the staining by sialyl SSEA-1 was found to be far better than that of CEA in examining either malignant mesothelioma or lung cancer. Thus, we found that not only CEA but also sialyl SSEA-1 antigen staining was useful for the diagnosing of a malignant mesothelioma.

摘要

对5例恶性间皮瘤和5例原发性肺腺癌的肿瘤组织进行了研究,采用过氧化物酶抗过氧化物酶(PAP)法用唾液酸化SSEA-1抗体染色。所有恶性间皮瘤病例(上皮样和肉瘤样模式)的结果均为绝对阴性。然而,所有肺癌病例均呈阳性,只是程度不同。在评估恶性间皮瘤时,许多报告表明癌胚抗原(CEA)染色阴性有助于与肺癌进行鉴别诊断。发现在检查恶性间皮瘤或肺癌时,唾液酸化SSEA-1染色的敏感性远优于CEA。因此,我们发现不仅CEA而且唾液酸化SSEA-1抗原染色对恶性间皮瘤的诊断都很有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验