• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用决策树预测胃癌患者的死亡概率。

Predicting the probability of mortality of gastric cancer patients using decision tree.

作者信息

Mohammadzadeh F, Noorkojuri H, Pourhoseingholi M A, Saadat S, Baghestani A R

机构信息

Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran.

出版信息

Ir J Med Sci. 2015 Jun;184(2):277-84. doi: 10.1007/s11845-014-1100-9. Epub 2014 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1007/s11845-014-1100-9
PMID:24626962
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer is the fourth most common cancer worldwide. This reason motivated us to investigate and introduce gastric cancer risk factors utilizing statistical methods.

AIM

The aim of this study was to identify the most important factors influencing the mortality of patients who suffer from gastric cancer disease and to introduce a classification approach according to decision tree model for predicting the probability of mortality from this disease.

METHODS

Data on 216 patients with gastric cancer, who were registered in Taleghani hospital in Tehran,Iran, were analyzed. At first, patients were divided into two groups: the dead and alive. Then, to fit decision tree model to our data, we randomly selected 20% of dataset to the test sample and remaining dataset considered as the training sample. Finally, the validity of the model examined with sensitivity, specificity, diagnosis accuracy and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The CART version 6.0 and SPSS version 19.0 softwares were used for the analysis of the data.

RESULTS

Diabetes, ethnicity, tobacco, tumor size, surgery, pathologic stage, age at diagnosis, exposure to chemical weapons and alcohol consumption were determined as effective factors on mortality of gastric cancer. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of decision tree were 0.72, 0.75 and 0.74 respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The indices of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy represented that the decision tree model has acceptable accuracy to prediction the probability of mortality in gastric cancer patients. So a simple decision tree consisted of factors affecting on mortality of gastric cancer may help clinicians as a reliable and practical tool to predict the probability of mortality in these patients.

摘要

背景

胃癌是全球第四大常见癌症。这一原因促使我们利用统计方法调查并介绍胃癌的危险因素。

目的

本研究的目的是确定影响胃癌患者死亡率的最重要因素,并引入一种基于决策树模型的分类方法来预测该疾病的死亡概率。

方法

对伊朗德黑兰塔莱哈尼医院登记的216例胃癌患者的数据进行分析。首先,将患者分为两组:死亡组和存活组。然后,为使决策树模型适用于我们的数据,我们随机选择20%的数据作为测试样本,其余数据作为训练样本。最后,通过敏感性、特异性、诊断准确性和受试者工作特征曲线下面积来检验模型的有效性。使用CART 6.0版和SPSS 19.0版软件进行数据分析。

结果

糖尿病、种族、烟草、肿瘤大小、手术、病理分期、诊断时年龄、接触化学武器和饮酒被确定为影响胃癌死亡率的因素。决策树的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为0.72、0.75和0.74。

结论

敏感性、特异性和准确性指标表明,决策树模型在预测胃癌患者死亡概率方面具有可接受的准确性。因此,一个由影响胃癌死亡率的因素组成的简单决策树可能有助于临床医生作为一种可靠且实用的工具来预测这些患者的死亡概率。

相似文献

1
Predicting the probability of mortality of gastric cancer patients using decision tree.使用决策树预测胃癌患者的死亡概率。
Ir J Med Sci. 2015 Jun;184(2):277-84. doi: 10.1007/s11845-014-1100-9. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
2
Predicting the Survival of Gastric Cancer Patients Using Artificial and Bayesian Neural Networks.使用人工神经网络和贝叶斯神经网络预测胃癌患者的生存率
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018 Feb 26;19(2):487-490. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.2.487.
3
Application of machine learning models based on decision trees in classifying the factors affecting mortality of COVID-19 patients in Hamadan, Iran.基于决策树的机器学习模型在伊朗哈马丹 COVID-19 患者死亡率影响因素分类中的应用。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Jul 24;22(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01939-x.
4
A new prediction model for assessing the clinical outcomes of ICU patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a decision tree analysis.一种用于评估社区获得性肺炎 ICU 患者临床结局的新预测模型:决策树分析。
Ann Med. 2019 Feb;51(1):41-50. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2018.1518580. Epub 2019 Mar 23.
5
Comparison of hospital charge prediction models for gastric cancer patients: neural network vs. decision tree models.胃癌患者住院费用预测模型的比较:神经网络与决策树模型
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Sep 14;9:161. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-161.
6
C-reactive protein to albumin ratio is a key indicator in a predictive model for anastomosis leakage after esophagectomy: Application of classification and regression tree analysis.C 反应蛋白与白蛋白比值是预测食管癌手术后吻合口漏的预测模型中的关键指标:分类回归树分析的应用。
Thorac Cancer. 2019 Apr;10(4):728-737. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12990. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
7
Identifying Risk Factors for Drug Use in an Iranian Treatment Sample: A Prediction Approach Using Decision Trees.识别伊朗治疗样本中药物使用的风险因素:使用决策树的预测方法。
Subst Use Misuse. 2018 May 12;53(6):1030-1040. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2017.1392981. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
8
Survival in gastric cancer patients: univariate and multivariate analysis.胃癌患者的生存率:单因素和多因素分析。
East Afr J Public Health. 2009 Apr;6 Suppl(1):41-4. doi: 10.4314/eajph.v6i3.45773.
9
[Construction and validation of a decision tree based on biomarkers for predicting severe acute kidney injury in critically ill patients].[基于生物标志物构建和验证用于预测危重症患者严重急性肾损伤的决策树]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Jun;32(6):721-725. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200509-00371.
10
Predicting the incidence of portosplenomesenteric vein thrombosis in patients with acute pancreatitis using classification and regression tree algorithm.使用分类与回归树算法预测急性胰腺炎患者门静脉脾肠系膜静脉血栓形成的发生率
J Crit Care. 2017 Jun;39:124-130. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.02.019. Epub 2017 Feb 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Rethinking the prognosis model of differentiated thyroid carcinoma.重新思考分化型甲状腺癌的预后模型。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 30;15:1419125. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1419125. eCollection 2024.
2
The Relationship between Diabetes Mellitus and Gastric Cancer and the Potential Benefits of Metformin: An Extensive Review of the Literature.糖尿病与胃癌的关系及二甲双胍的潜在获益:文献综述。
Biomolecules. 2021 Jul 13;11(7):1022. doi: 10.3390/biom11071022.
3
Associations between the severity of medical and surgical complications and perception of surgeon empathy in esophageal and gastric cancer patients.

本文引用的文献

1
A review on delayed toxic effects of sulfur mustard in Iranian veterans.关于伊朗老兵中硫芥延迟毒性作用的综述。
Daru. 2012 Oct 9;20(1):51. doi: 10.1186/2008-2231-20-51.
2
Tumor size as a prognostic factor in gastric cancer patient.肿瘤大小作为胃癌患者的预后因素。
J Gastric Cancer. 2012 Sep;12(3):164-72. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2012.12.3.164. Epub 2012 Sep 30.
3
Tumor size as a prognostic factor in patients with advanced gastric cancer in the lower third of the stomach.胃下部进展期胃癌患者肿瘤大小作为预后因素。
食管癌和胃癌患者的医疗和手术并发症严重程度与对外科医生同理心的感知之间的关联。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Dec;29(12):7551-7561. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06257-y. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
4
Massive transfusion prediction in patients with multiple trauma by decision tree: a retrospective analysis.通过决策树预测多发伤患者的大量输血:一项回顾性分析
Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2021 Apr;37(2):302-308. doi: 10.1007/s12288-020-01348-y. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Evaluation of the value of multiparameter combined analysis of serum markers in the early diagnosis of gastric cancer.血清标志物多参数联合分析在胃癌早期诊断中的价值评估
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2020 Apr 15;12(4):483-491. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i4.483.
6
Management of imported malaria cases and healthcare institutions in central China, 2012-2017: application of decision tree analysis.2012-2017 年中国中部输入性疟疾病例管理和医疗机构的应用:决策树分析。
Malar J. 2019 Dec 18;18(1):429. doi: 10.1186/s12936-019-3065-7.
7
Prognostic profile of patients with non-viral hepatocellular carcinoma: A comparative study with hepatitis C virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma using data mining analysis.非病毒性肝细胞癌患者的预后特征:一项使用数据挖掘分析与丙型肝炎病毒相关肝细胞癌的比较研究。
Oncol Lett. 2019 Jul;18(1):227-236. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.10285. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
8
Combining statistical techniques to predict postsurgical risk of 1-year mortality for patients with colon cancer.结合统计技术预测结肠癌患者术后1年死亡风险。
Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Mar 6;10:235-251. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S146729. eCollection 2018.
9
Prediction models for patients with esophageal or gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.食管癌或胃癌患者的预测模型:系统评价与荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 8;13(2):e0192310. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192310. eCollection 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Oct 14;18(38):5470-5. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i38.5470.
4
Alcohol consumption and risk of gastric cancer: a cohort study of men in Kaunas, Lithuania, with up to 30 years follow-up.饮酒与胃癌风险:立陶宛考纳斯男性长达 30 年的队列研究。
BMC Cancer. 2012 Oct 15;12:475. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-475.
5
Sequential decision tree using the analytic hierarchy process for decision support in rectal cancer.使用层次分析法的序贯决策树在直肠癌决策支持中的应用。
Artif Intell Med. 2012 Sep;56(1):59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2012.05.003. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
6
A decade in gastric cancer curative surgery: Evidence of progress (1999-2009).胃癌根治性手术十年进展(1999-2009 年)。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Mar 27;4(3):45-54. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v4.i3.45.
7
Diabetes and cancer (1): evaluating the temporal relationship between type 2 diabetes and cancer incidence.糖尿病与癌症(1):评估 2 型糖尿病与癌症发病率之间的时间关系。
Diabetologia. 2012 Jun;55(6):1607-18. doi: 10.1007/s00125-012-2525-1. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
8
The prognostic effect of ethnicity for gastric and esophageal cancer: the population-based experience in British Columbia, Canada.种族对胃癌和食管癌的预后影响:加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的基于人群的经验。
BMC Cancer. 2011 May 9;11:164. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-164.
9
Prediction of large esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients using classification and regression tree analysis.采用分类回归树分析预测肝硬化患者的大食管静脉曲张。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011;66(1):119-24. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322011000100021.
10
Alcohol and tobacco use in relation to gastric cancer: a prospective study of men in Shanghai, China.饮酒和吸烟与胃癌的关系:中国上海男性的前瞻性研究。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Sep;19(9):2287-97. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0362. Epub 2010 Aug 10.