Fifer Joanne M, Barutchu Ayla, Shivdasani Mohit N, Crewther Sheila G
School of Psychological Science, La Trobe University, Bundoora, 3086, Australia.
Florey Institutes of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3010, Australia.
F1000Res. 2013 Feb 7;2:34. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.2-34.v2. eCollection 2013.
To date, few studies have focused on the behavioural differences between the learning of multisensory auditory-visual and intra-modal associations. More specifically, the relative benefits of novel auditory-visual and verbal-visual associations for learning have not been directly compared. In Experiment 1, 20 adult volunteers completed three paired associate learning tasks: non-verbal novel auditory-visual (novel-AV), verbal-visual (verbal-AV; using pseudowords), and visual-visual (shape-VV). Participants were directed to make a motor response to matching novel and arbitrarily related stimulus pairs. Feedback was provided to facilitate trial and error learning. The results of Signal Detection Theory analyses suggested a multisensory enhancement of learning, with significantly higher discriminability measures (d-prime) in both the novel-AV and verbal-AV tasks than the shape-VV task. Motor reaction times were also significantly faster during the verbal-AV task than during the non-verbal learning tasks. Experiment 2 (n = 12) used a forced-choice discrimination paradigm to assess whether a difference in unisensory stimulus discriminability could account for the learning trends in Experiment 1. Participants were significantly slower at discriminating unisensory pseudowords than the novel sounds and visual shapes, which was notable given that these stimuli produced superior learning. Together the findings suggest that verbal information has an added enhancing effect on multisensory associative learning in adults.
迄今为止,很少有研究关注多感官视听学习与模态内联想学习之间的行为差异。更具体地说,新颖的视听和言语-视觉联想对学习的相对益处尚未得到直接比较。在实验1中,20名成年志愿者完成了三项配对联想学习任务:非言语新颖视听(新颖-AV)、言语-视觉(言语-AV;使用假词)和视觉-视觉(形状-VV)。参与者被要求对匹配的新颖和任意相关刺激对做出运动反应。提供反馈以促进试错学习。信号检测理论分析结果表明存在多感官学习增强效应,在新颖-AV和言语-AV任务中的辨别力指标(d')显著高于形状-VV任务。言语-AV任务期间的运动反应时间也显著快于非言语学习任务。实验2(n = 12)采用强制选择辨别范式来评估单感官刺激辨别力的差异是否可以解释实验1中的学习趋势。参与者辨别单感官假词的速度明显慢于新颖声音和视觉形状,鉴于这些刺激产生了更好的学习效果,这一点值得注意。这些研究结果共同表明,言语信息对成年人的多感官联想学习具有额外的增强作用。