• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2003 - 2013年芬兰酒精政策与公众舆论的变化

Changes in alcohol policies and public opinions in Finland 2003-2013.

作者信息

Österberg Esa, Lindeman Mikaela, Karlsson Thomas

机构信息

Alcohol and Drugs Unit, Department of Alcohol, Drugs and Addiction, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Rev. 2014 May;33(3):242-8. doi: 10.1111/dar.12128. Epub 2014 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1111/dar.12128
PMID:24628708
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There is a constant and ongoing interplay between public opinions and public policies, alcohol policies being no exception. This article describes the development of public opinions regarding alcohol policy in Finland during a 10-year period between 2003 and 2013. Fluctuations in the alcohol policy opinion climate are put in context by looking at concurrent changes in alcohol policies and in total alcohol consumption.

DATA AND METHODS

The study is based on data from opinion surveys on alcohol policies commissioned by the National Institute for Health and Welfare and the Finnish Social and Health Association. The opinion polls include questions about the general acceptance of prevailing alcohol policies, appropriate sales channels of different alcoholic beverage categories and opinions about the legal age limits and prices of alcoholic beverages. In the study, changes in alcohol policy during 2003-2013 are surveyed, and their relationship with changes in alcohol policy opinion is examined.

RESULTS

There seem to be a strong positive correlation during the study period between the level of alcohol consumption and the share of those wanting a more restrictive alcohol policy in Finland.

DISCUSSION

It seems that an increased level of awareness of alcohol-related issues among the general public created a more restrictive opinion climate on alcohol policy issues after the big alcohol excise duty decrease in 2004. The reverse seems to happen but in a lesser degree when alcohol excise duties has been increased after the year 2007.

摘要

引言

公众舆论与公共政策之间存在持续不断的相互作用,酒精政策也不例外。本文描述了2003年至2013年这10年间芬兰公众对酒精政策看法的发展情况。通过审视酒精政策及酒精总消费量的同步变化,将酒精政策舆论氛围的波动置于相应背景中。

数据与方法

本研究基于芬兰国家健康与福利研究所及芬兰社会与健康协会委托开展的关于酒精政策的民意调查数据。这些民意调查包括有关对现行酒精政策的总体接受度、不同酒类饮料的合适销售渠道以及对酒类饮料法定年龄限制和价格的看法等问题。在本研究中,调查了2003 - 2013年期间酒精政策的变化,并考察了其与酒精政策看法变化之间的关系。

结果

在研究期间,芬兰的酒精消费水平与希望实施更严格酒精政策的人群比例之间似乎存在很强的正相关关系。

讨论

2004年大幅降低酒精消费税之后,公众对酒精相关问题的认识水平提高,似乎在酒精政策问题上营造了一种更具限制性的舆论氛围。2007年之后提高酒精消费税时,情况似乎相反,但程度较轻。

相似文献

1
Changes in alcohol policies and public opinions in Finland 2003-2013.2003 - 2013年芬兰酒精政策与公众舆论的变化
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2014 May;33(3):242-8. doi: 10.1111/dar.12128. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
2
Public opinion on alcohol policies.关于酒精政策的公众舆论。
J Public Health Policy. 1990 Summer;11(2):189-205.
3
Long-term trends in alcohol policy attitudes in Norway.挪威酒精政策态度的长期趋势。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2014 May;33(3):220-6. doi: 10.1111/dar.12098. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
4
Finland: increases in alcohol availability and consumption.
Subst Use Misuse. 2014 Oct;49(12):1569-75. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2014.913434. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
5
Real or perceived impediments to minimum pricing of alcohol in Australia: public opinion, the industry and the law.澳大利亚酒类最低定价的实际或感知障碍:公众意见、行业和法律。
Int J Drug Policy. 2013 Nov;24(6):517-23. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 Jun 15.
6
Public support for alcohol policies associated with knowledge of cancer risk.公众对与癌症风险认知相关的酒精政策的支持。
Int J Drug Policy. 2015 Apr;26(4):371-9. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.08.006. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
7
Alcohol tax changes and the use of alcohol in Europe.酒精税的变化与欧洲的酒精使用情况。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2011 Mar;30(2):124-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2010.00265.x.
8
The Link Between Alcohol Sales and Alcohol-Related Harm in Finland, 1995-2016.芬兰 1995-2016 年酒类销售与酒类相关伤害之间的关联。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2020 Sep;81(5):641-646.
9
Comparing alcohol taxation throughout the European Union.比较整个欧盟的酒精税收。
Addiction. 2019 Aug;114(8):1489-1494. doi: 10.1111/add.14631. Epub 2019 May 30.
10
Changes in Australian attitudes to alcohol policy: 1995-2010.1995年至2010年澳大利亚人对酒精政策态度的变化。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2014 May;33(3):227-34. doi: 10.1111/dar.12106. Epub 2013 Dec 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Changing public perceptions of alcohol, alcohol harms and alcohol policies: A multi-methods study to develop novel framing approaches.改变公众对酒精、酒精危害及酒精政策的认知:一项旨在开发新型框架构建方法的多方法研究。
Addiction. 2025 Apr;120(4):655-668. doi: 10.1111/add.16743. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
2
Public opinion and experiences of crime two and five years following the implementation of a targeted regulation of licensed premises in Newcastle, Australia.在澳大利亚纽卡斯尔实施有针对性的持牌场所监管措施两年和五年后,公众对犯罪的看法和经历。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2021 Mar;40(3):489-498. doi: 10.1111/dar.13207. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
3
Epidemiological profile of alcoholic liver disease hospital admissions in a Latin American country over a 10-year period.
一个拉丁美洲国家10年间酒精性肝病住院患者的流行病学概况。
World J Hepatol. 2020 May 27;12(5):230-238. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v12.i5.230.
4
Improving Knowledge that Alcohol Can Cause Cancer is Associated with Consumer Support for Alcohol Policies: Findings from a Real-World Alcohol Labelling Study.提高对酒精致癌的认识与消费者对酒精政策的支持有关:来自真实世界酒精标签研究的发现。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 7;17(2):398. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020398.
5
How Attitudes toward Alcohol Policies Differ across European Countries: Evidence from the Standardized European Alcohol Survey (SEAS).各国对酒精政策的态度有何不同:来自标准化欧洲酒精调查(SEAS)的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 13;16(22):4461. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224461.
6
Understanding public opinion to the introduction of minimum unit pricing in Scotland: a qualitative study using Twitter.了解苏格兰引入最低单位定价的公众意见:使用 Twitter 的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 14;9(6):e029690. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029690.
7
Support for alcohol policies among drinkers in Mongolia, New Zealand, Peru, South Africa, St Kitts and Nevis, Thailand and Vietnam: Data from the International Alcohol Control Study.蒙古、新西兰、秘鲁、南非、圣基茨和尼维斯、泰国和越南饮酒者对酒精政策的支持:来自国际酒精控制研究的数据。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018 Aug;37 Suppl 2(Suppl Suppl 2):S72-S85. doi: 10.1111/dar.12647. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
8
Support for alcohol policies from drinkers in the City of Tshwane, South Africa: Data from the International Alcohol Control study.南非茨瓦内市饮酒者对酒精政策的支持:来自国际酒精控制研究的数据。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018 Apr;37 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):S210-S217. doi: 10.1111/dar.12554. Epub 2017 May 10.