Boudreau Shellie A, Falla Deborah
Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Ålborg, Denmark,
Exp Brain Res. 2014 Jun;232(6):2011-20. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-3891-3. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
The aim of this study was to assess the activation of the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) and splenius capitis (SC) muscles in response to unanticipated, full body perturbations in individuals with chronic neck pain (NP) and age-matched healthy controls (HC). Individuals with NP had a history of NP for 8.9 ± 7.8 years, rated the intensity of NP as 4.2 ± 2.0 (score out of 10), and scored 15.3 ± 6.5 on the Neck Disability Index. Participants stood on a moveable platform during which 32 randomized postural perturbations (eight repetitions of four perturbation types: 8 cm forward slide (FS), 8 cm backward slides, 10° forward tilt, and 10° backward tilt) with varying inter-perturbation time intervals were performed over a period of 5 min. Bilateral surface electromyography (EMG) from the SCM and SC was recorded, and the onset time and the average rectified value of the EMG signal was determined for epochs of 100 ms; starting 100 ms prior to and 500 ms after the perturbation onset. Individuals with NP, as compared to HC, demonstrated delayed onset times and reduced EMG amplitude of the SCM and SC muscles in response to all postural perturbations. Such findings were most pronounced following the FS postural perturbation (healthy vs. NP for SCM 83.3 ± 8.0 vs. 86.3 ± 4.4 and SC 75.6 ± 3.5 vs. 89.3 ± 4.2), which was also associated with the greatest change (expressed in % relative to baseline) in EMG amplitude (healthy vs. NP for SCM 206.6 ± 50.4 vs. 115.9 ± 15.7 and SC 83.4 ± 19.2 vs. 69.2 ± 10.9) across all postural perturbations types. Individuals with NP display altered neural control of the neck musculature in response to rapid, unanticipated full body postural perturbations. Although the relative timing of neck musculature activity in individuals with NP appears to be intact, simultaneous co-activation of the neck musculature emerges for unanticipated anterior-posterior postural perturbations.
本研究的目的是评估慢性颈部疼痛(NP)患者和年龄匹配的健康对照者(HC)在应对意外的全身扰动时,胸锁乳突肌(SCM)和头夹肌(SC)的激活情况。NP患者的NP病史为8.9±7.8年,NP强度评分为4.2±2.0(满分10分),颈部功能障碍指数得分为15.3±6.5。参与者站在一个可移动平台上,在5分钟内进行32次随机姿势扰动(四种扰动类型各重复8次:8厘米向前滑动(FS)、8厘米向后滑动、10°向前倾斜和10°向后倾斜),扰动间隔时间各不相同。记录SCM和SC的双侧表面肌电图(EMG),并确定EMG信号在100毫秒时间段内的起始时间和平均整流值;从扰动开始前100毫秒到扰动开始后500毫秒。与HC相比,NP患者在应对所有姿势扰动时,SCM和SC肌肉的起始时间延迟,EMG幅度降低。这些发现在FS姿势扰动后最为明显(SCM健康组与NP组分别为83.3±8.0与86.3±4.4,SC为75.6±3.5与89.3±4.2),这也与所有姿势扰动类型中EMG幅度的最大变化(相对于基线的百分比)相关(SCM健康组与NP组分别为206.6±50.4与115.9±15.7,SC为83.4±19.2与69.2±10.9)。NP患者在应对快速、意外的全身姿势扰动时,颈部肌肉组织的神经控制发生改变。尽管NP患者颈部肌肉活动的相对时间似乎完好无损,但在应对意外的前后姿势扰动时,颈部肌肉组织会同时出现共同激活。