Suppr超能文献

摇头丸的效果在各实验室中是一致的。

MDMA effects consistent across laboratories.

作者信息

Kirkpatrick Matthew G, Baggott Matthew J, Mendelson John E, Galloway Gantt P, Liechti Matthias E, Hysek Cédric M, de Wit Harriet

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., MC 3077, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.

出版信息

Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2014 Oct;231(19):3899-905. doi: 10.1007/s00213-014-3528-z. Epub 2014 Mar 15.

Abstract

RATIONALE

Several laboratories have conducted placebo-controlled drug challenge studies with 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), providing a unique source of data to examine the reliability of the acute effects of the drug across subject samples and settings. We examined the subjective and physiological responses to the drug across three different laboratories and investigated the influence of prior MDMA use.

METHODS

Overall, 220 healthy volunteers with varying levels of previous MDMA experience participated in laboratory-based studies in which they received placebo or MDMA orally (1.5 mg/kg or 125-mg fixed dose) under double-blind conditions. Cardiovascular and subjective effects were assessed before and repeatedly after drug administration. The studies were conducted independently by investigators in Basel, San Francisco, and Chicago.

RESULTS

Despite methodological differences between the studies and differences in the subjects' drug use histories, MDMA produced very similar cardiovascular and subjective effects across the sites. The participants' prior use of MDMA was inversely related to feeling "Any Drug Effect" only at sites testing more experienced users.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that the pharmacological effects of MDMA are robust and highly reproducible across settings. There was also modest evidence for tolerance to the effects of MDMA in regular users.

摘要

原理

几个实验室进行了3,4-亚甲基二氧甲基苯丙胺(摇头丸)的安慰剂对照药物激发研究,提供了一个独特的数据源,以检验该药物在不同受试者样本和环境中的急性效应的可靠性。我们研究了三个不同实验室中对该药物的主观和生理反应,并调查了既往使用摇头丸的影响。

方法

总体而言,220名有不同程度既往摇头丸使用经历的健康志愿者参与了基于实验室的研究,在双盲条件下口服安慰剂或摇头丸(1.5毫克/千克或125毫克固定剂量)。在给药前和给药后多次评估心血管和主观效应。这些研究由巴塞尔、旧金山和芝加哥的研究人员独立进行。

结果

尽管研究之间存在方法学差异以及受试者用药史不同,但摇头丸在各个地点产生了非常相似的心血管和主观效应。仅在测试经验更丰富使用者的地点,参与者既往使用摇头丸与感觉“有任何药物效应”呈负相关。

结论

这些数据表明,摇头丸的药理效应在不同环境中是强大且高度可重复的。也有适度证据表明经常使用者对摇头丸的效应产生了耐受性。

相似文献

1
MDMA effects consistent across laboratories.摇头丸的效果在各实验室中是一致的。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2014 Oct;231(19):3899-905. doi: 10.1007/s00213-014-3528-z. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
3
MDMA: a social drug in a social context.摇头丸:社会背景下的一种社交性毒品。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2015 Mar;232(6):1155-63. doi: 10.1007/s00213-014-3752-6. Epub 2014 Oct 5.
4
Safety pharmacology of acute MDMA administration in healthy subjects.健康受试者急性服用摇头丸的安全药理学
J Psychopharmacol. 2017 May;31(5):576-588. doi: 10.1177/0269881117691569. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
5
Gender differences in the subjective effects of MDMA.摇头丸主观效应中的性别差异。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2001 Mar 1;154(2):161-8. doi: 10.1007/s002130000648.
10
Effects of MDMA and Intranasal oxytocin on social and emotional processing.摇头丸和鼻内催产素对社交与情感加工的影响。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2014 Jun;39(7):1654-63. doi: 10.1038/npp.2014.12. Epub 2014 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

6
Pharmacological effects of methylone and MDMA in humans.甲烯二氧吡咯戊酮和摇头丸对人体的药理作用。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Feb 17;14:1122861. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1122861. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
In the company of others: social factors alter acute alcohol effects.在他人陪伴下:社会因素会改变酒精的急性效应。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2013 Nov;230(2):215-26. doi: 10.1007/s00213-013-3147-0. Epub 2013 May 28.
6
Replication studies: Bad copy.复制研究:糟糕的复制品。
Nature. 2012 May 16;485(7398):298-300. doi: 10.1038/485298a.
7
Prediction of psilocybin response in healthy volunteers.健康志愿者中致幻蘑菇反应的预测。
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030800. Epub 2012 Feb 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验