Kuo Ben Ch, Kwantes Catherine T
University of Windsor, Windsor, Canada ; Department of Psychology, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Ave, Chrysler Hall South, Windsor, Ontario N9B 3P4 Canada.
Department of Psychology, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Ave, Chrysler Hall South, Windsor, Ontario N9B 3P4 Canada.
Springerplus. 2014 Mar 1;3:119. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-119. eCollection 2014.
Despite the prevalence and popularity of research on positive and negative affect within the field of psychology, there is currently little research on affect involving the examination of cultural variables and with participants of diverse cultural and ethnic backgrounds. To the authors' knowledge, currently no empirical studies have comprehensively examined predictive models of positive and negative affect based specifically on multiple psychosocial, acculturation, and coping variables as predictors with any sample populations. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to test the predictive power of perceived stress, social support, bidirectional acculturation (i.e., Canadian acculturation and heritage acculturation), religious coping and cultural coping (i.e., collective, avoidance, and engagement coping) in explaining positive and negative affect in a multiethnic sample of 301 undergraduate students in Canada. Two hierarchal multiple regressions were conducted, one for each affect as the dependent variable, with the above described predictors. The results supported the hypotheses and showed the two overall models to be significant in predicting affect of both kinds. Specifically, a higher level of positive affect was predicted by a lower level of perceived stress, less use of religious coping, and more use of engagement coping in dealing with stress by the participants. Higher level of negative affect, however, was predicted by a higher level of perceived stress and more use of avoidance coping in responding to stress. The current findings highlight the value and relevance of empirically examining the stress-coping-adaptation experiences of diverse populations from an affective conceptual framework, particularly with the inclusion of positive affect. Implications and recommendations for advancing future research and theoretical works in this area are considered and presented.
尽管心理学领域对积极和消极情绪的研究普遍且热门,但目前关于情绪的研究很少涉及文化变量的考察,也很少有来自不同文化和种族背景的参与者。据作者所知,目前尚无实证研究专门基于多个心理社会、文化适应和应对变量作为预测因素,对任何样本群体全面检验积极和消极情绪的预测模型。因此,本研究的目的是检验感知压力、社会支持、双向文化适应(即加拿大文化适应和传统文化适应)、宗教应对和文化应对(即集体应对、回避应对和参与应对)在解释加拿大301名本科生多民族样本中的积极和消极情绪方面的预测能力。进行了两次层次多元回归分析,分别以上述预测因素为自变量,两种情绪中的每一种为因变量。结果支持了假设,表明这两个总体模型在预测两种情绪方面都具有显著性。具体而言,参与者感知压力水平较低、较少使用宗教应对方式以及更多使用参与应对方式来应对压力时,预测会有更高水平的积极情绪。然而,感知压力水平较高以及在应对压力时更多使用回避应对方式,则预测会有更高水平的消极情绪。当前的研究结果凸显了从情感概念框架实证考察不同人群压力应对适应经历的价值和相关性,尤其是纳入积极情绪的情况。本文考虑并提出了推进该领域未来研究和理论工作的意义及建议。